Republicans in campaign mode for top spots on House environmental committees

Even with vote tallying still underway, some House Republicans are already eyeing the next race, laying the groundwork for leadership positions on Congress’s environmentally-focused committees.

The retirements of House Natural Resources ranking member Rob BishopRobert (Rob) William BishopHillicon Valley: House votes to condemn QAnon | Americans worried about foreign election interference | DHS confirms request to tap protester phones House approves measure condemning QAnon, but 17 Republicans vote against it OVERNIGHT ENERGY:  House passes sweeping clean energy bill | Pebble Mine CEO resigns over secretly recorded comments about government officials  | Corporations roll out climate goals amid growing pressure to deliver MORE (Utah) and Energy and Commerce Chairman Greg WaldenGregory (Greg) Paul WaldenEnsuring more Americans have access to 5G technology Race heats up for top GOP post on powerful Energy and Commerce Committee Asbestos ban stalls in Congress amid partisan fight MORE (Ore.) have left open seats at a time where Democrats may only hold a slim majority.

The steering committee that selects committee leaders could be assembled by the middle of the month, with presentations from candidates slated for as early as the first week of December.

ADVERTISEMENT

Reps. Bruce WestermanBruce Eugene WestermanRepublicans in campaign mode for top spots on House environmental committees COVID-19 complicates California’s record-setting wildfire season  Cheap, at-home coronavirus tests exist — why aren’t we using them? MORE (Ark.) and Paul GosarPaul Anthony GosarFrankel defeats Loomer in Florida House race Why Maricopa County will choose the next president Hillicon Valley: House votes to condemn QAnon | Americans worried about foreign election interference | DHS confirms request to tap protester phones MORE (A.Z.) are actively campaigning to take over on Natural Resources, while a fiercely fought contest for the broad Energy and Commerce role is already underway between Reps. Cathy McMorris RodgersCathy McMorris RodgersConservatives seize on New York Post story to push Section 230 reform Race heats up for top GOP post on powerful Energy and Commerce Committee Hillicon Valley: Trump backs potential Microsoft, TikTok deal, sets September deadline | House Republicans request classified TikTok briefing | Facebook labels manipulated Pelosi video MORE (Ore.), Michael BurgessMichael Clifton BurgessRace heats up for top GOP post on powerful Energy and Commerce Committee Hillicon Valley: House votes to condemn QAnon | Americans worried about foreign election interference | DHS confirms request to tap protester phones House approves measure condemning QAnon, but 17 Republicans vote against it MORE (Texas) and Bob Latta (Ohio).

On the Natural Resources side, Westerman’s background — he is a Yale Forestry School graduate and the sponsor of the Trillion Trees Act— will be pitted against Gosar’s Western roots, a trait shared by most other Republicans that have led the committee.

“I think with my background and experience I can lead the committee to where we need to go,” Westerman said. “I think I’ve got a lot of practical experience with resources, the issue of how the policies the committee considers affects both public and private interests.”

His bill, which seeks to plant some 3.3 billion trees each year over the next 30 years as a way to store carbon, is one of the few legislative vehicles for a GOP focused on using tree planting as a core part of their environmental messaging.

He wants to help the party focus on its conservation message — an effort that largely took hold after a bipartisan group of senators introduced the Great American Outdoors Act, a massive conservation package now signed into law. President TrumpDonald John TrumpAides tried to get Trump to stop attacking McCain in hopes of clinching Arizona: report Officials warn delayed vote count could lead to flood of disinformation New Trump campaign lawsuit targets late-arriving Georgia mail ballots MORE and others have pointed to the act as a way to beef up an otherwise slim environmental record.

“I think we’ve got to retake the conservation narrative, something Republicans have been very strong on and can be stronger on in the future,” Westerman said. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The Hill previously reported Reps. Doug LambornDouglas (Doug) LambornRepublicans in campaign mode for top spots on House environmental committees Iran must free Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani House GOP urge Trump against supporting additional funding for state and local governments MORE (Colo.), Tom McClintockThomas (Tom) Milller McClintockRepublicans in campaign mode for top spots on House environmental committees House votes to condemn alleged hysterectomies on migrant women House to vote on removing cannabis from list of controlled substances MORE (Calif.) may have been interested in the role, but sources say race has since primarily whittled to the two. 

Westerman might be considered a safer, more traditional pick over Gosar, who has made controversial comments about “climate hoax believers” and drew attention with a series of tweets whose first letters spelled out “Epstein didn’t kill himself,” a nod to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.  

Gosar, who did not respond to request for comment, is chair of the Western Congressional Caucus.

“I think Congressman Gosar’s claim to fame is going to be what he’s done in the Western Caucus, taking a caucus with 30 members and growing it to now well over 60 members,” a Republican House aide told The Hill.

“That record is not really negotiable, and he’s had some really good success, and he will run with that,” they said. “Western caucus issues are the dominant issues within the Natural Resources Committee, and the jurisdiction of the committee largely lies in the West.”

Westerman said his background and hailing from a large rural district with a bounty of federal land should help him combat those arguments.

On the Energy and Commerce side, McMorris Rodgers’s pitch portrays her as a well-rounded choice to lead a large committee with broad jurisdiction.

“I believe that I’m proven, and as I talk to members of the steering committee, many have said that they believe I have earned it,” she said, noting her six years as House Republican Conference chairwoman.

“It’s the combination of having proven myself from a political perspective, the leadership experience, the policy leadership, the communications skills I bring having done the tough interviews — it’s a combination of all of those things that make me uniquely prepared.”  

She’s also relying on her work as a solid fundraiser, more than doubling her fundraising requirement to the National Republican Congressional Committee and donating nearly $300,000 to other candidates.

“Over the years that I’ve been in Congress, I’ve been one of the top fundraisers and have dedicated time to traveling the country and raising money and helping candidates,” she said.

If McMorris Rodgers is selected, she would make history as the first top female leader for either party on the committee, she said, a detail she called “the cherry on top.”

But a former House leadership staffer told The Hill that while the scales may be tipped towards McMorris Rodgers right now, observers should not underestimate the strength of Burgess’s connections, both to the administration and his delegation.

Despite Democratic hopes of flipping Texas, Republicans there retained every seat while winning open ones. 

“Texas strong, Texas big is a huge factor in how that plays out. It gives Dr. Burgess a good foundation if he’s able to mobilize that delegation, which you’d expect him to be able to do,” they said. 

Burgess already serves as the Republican lead on the health subcommittee and argues his Texan status gives him the background he would need on the energy efforts that are also a large part of the committee’s domain. 

“We all have our strengths,” Burgess said. “I will have the highest seniority. As far as leadership on subcommittees, I can put my credentials up against anybody. No, I haven’t been chairman of the conference, but on the other hand, I put my heart and soul into committee work and the policy literally every day since I first started here.”

Latta is campaigning on his policy chops and legislation he has already passed through the committee. 

“As a member who has served on all six subcommittees and spearheaded legislation and initiatives from each of the five legislative subcommittees, I am intimately familiar with a broad span of policy issues,” he said in a statement to The Hill. 

“As chairman of E&C, I will ensure that our colleagues can take home examples of how House Republicans are proposing tangible solutions to our nation’s challenges.”

ACLU previews potential lawsuit against Trump's Muslim registry

The incoming legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) says any proposal from President-elect Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE to create a registry for Muslims is unconstitutional.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When executive action is challenged as targeting religion, the critical question is intent: If the government can be shown to have intentionally targeted a religious group, its actions violate the Free Exercise Clause,” David Cole wrote in a post on the ACLU website. “The law need not name the religion by name.”

Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina

Trump made waves during the Republican primary campaign when he called for a temporary “shutdown” of all Muslim immigration to the United States. More recently, reports have indicated that the incoming administration would instead focus on people coming to the U.S. from specific regions.

Trump’s campaign has denied any plans for a Muslim registry.

“President-elect Trump has never advocated for any registry or system that tracks individuals based on their religion, and to imply otherwise is completely false, communications adviser Jason Miller told CNN last week.

Cole argued that the Trump campaign’s denial of a potential registry is “semantics.”

“The transition team is reportedly planning just that, only under the guise of focusing on countries that happen to be majority Muslim,” Cole said.

He reasoned that Trump’s rhetoric on Muslim immigration demonstrated intent to target the Muslim faith, explaining that “the Supreme Court has ruled that circumstantial evidence can support a finding of unconstitutional intent.”

Failing To Convince on War, US Agrees to Follow Russia's Path To UN

(11:54 AM EST):

Russia’s push for a brokered settlement over the crisis in Syria appears to be gaining traction in Washington.

The Obama administration—finding very little success in its aggressive push for war—announced on Tuesday it is now willing to entertain talks with Russia and other members of the UN Security Council over a plan (see below) that would see Syria hand over control of chemical weapons to international monitors in a bid to avoid military intervention.

According to a tweet by the Associated Press late Tuesday morning:

And The Hill reports:

None of this, however, indicates that there’s a done deal at the UN. In fact, the Russians are reportedly unimpressed so far with the language drafted for the resolution by the French delegation. According to Reuters:

In a related development, a group of U.S. senators are reported to be drafting a new resolution for Congress that would authorize the use of military force only if the Syrians fail to satisfy an international agreement to hand over their chemical weapons stockpiles.

As the New York Times reports:

Tuesday’s developments allowed those pushing for a negotiated settlement to experience hope for avoiding a rush for immediate military strikes, but the threat of war still lingers.

Indeed, as new developments in the international arena continued to play out Tuesday, key members of Obama’s foreign policy team were sitting before the House Armed Services Committee pushing the case for war as hard as ever.

And as reporting by Inter Press Service point outs, a path through the UN is not necessarily a path away from war.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT