The House in a 220-197 vote on Friday approved the annual defense policy bill, avoiding a potential major embarrassment for Democrats as they kept most of the caucus in line to pass the bill without Republican support.

Just eight Democrats voted against the bill on final passage. Friday’s passage comes after Democratic leaders’ ability to hold the line was called into question earlier in the week.

ADVERTISEMENT

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was the first bill the House debated since the bitter fight over a $4.6 billion border aid bill. Progressives wanted more stringent rules on care for migrants included in the bill, but Democratic leaders decided to bring up a Senate-passed bill without those rules after moderates threw their support behind the bill.

Heading into the NDAA debate, progressives warned they thought the bill’s $733 billion price tag was too high.

An amendment to trim $16.8 billion from the bill failed, 115-307.

But progressives also said they could support the NDAA despite the funding concern if their other amendments passed. They were particularly concerned about amendments related to President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump boasts that Kim Jong Un ‘was so happy to see me’ Romney defends Paul Ryan: ‘The fault for our 2012 loss is mine alone’ Trump declares emergency over Tropical Storm Barry MORE’s war powers.

Earlier Friday, the House passed an amendment to prevent Trump from launching a military strike on Iran without prior congressional approval.

Democrats also approved amendments to block emergency arms sales to Saudi Arabia, end U.S. military support to the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen and repeal the 2002 authorization for the use of military force that authorized the Iraq War, among others.

“I held my nose and voted yes,” Progressive Caucus co-chair Rep. Pramila JayapalPramila JayapalDemocrats rush to support Pelosi amid fight with Ocasio-Cortez Progressive Democrat: Pelosi not used to other members having ‘bigger Twitter followings than her’ Judiciary issues blitz of subpoenas for Kushner, Sessions, Trump associates MORE (D-Wash.) said after the vote.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam SmithDavid (Adam) Adam SmithIt’s time for the left to advance a shared vision of national security: Start by passing the NDAA Carlson responds to Omar: It’s not about race Overnight Defense: Dems confident defense bill will pass despite party infighting | GOP chairman’s bill would review US, Saudi ties | Senators briefed on sexual assault allegation against top general MORE (D-Wash.) “worked very hard to incorporate some progressive priorities,” she added. “And then I’m working with Chairman Smith on establishing different ways that we can actually start to make the case for lowering military defense spending.”

Outside of war powers, amendments touched on a number of progressive priorities, including reversing Trump’s transgender military ban, giving federal employees 12 weeks of paid family leave, prohibiting military parades for political purposes and banning Pentagon funds from being used at Trump-owned properties.

But several progressive amendments on immigration failed, including one from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezDemocrats rush to support Pelosi amid fight with Ocasio-Cortez Sanders praises Gen Z for being ‘profoundly anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-homophobic’ Democratic lawmaker unloads on Ocasio-Cortez, chief of staff for ‘using the race card’ MORE (D-N.Y.) to block the any deployment of troops to the border to enforce immigration laws and to bar the use of funds to detain undocumented immigrants in Defense Department facilities.

Ocasio-Cortez voted against the final bill, as did Democratic Reps. Earl BlumenauerEarl BlumenauerOvernight Energy: Critics worry Trump ignoring plight of honeybees | EPA employee protests union contract while receiving award from Wheeler | Green groups team up to host presidential climate summit Critics worry Trump turning blind eye to honeybee decline Overnight Energy: Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders push to declare climate emergency | Lawmakers seek probe into aging pipelines | 23 governors back California in fight over Trump emissions rollback MORE (Ore.), Adriano EspaillatAdriano de Jesus Espaillat CabralLawmakers congratulate US women’s soccer team on winning opening World Cup match WHIP LIST: The 83 House Democrats backing an impeachment inquiry Dems charge ahead on immigration MORE (N.Y.), Barbara LeeBarbara Jean LeeCongress must reclaim its war-making powers Harris hops past Biden in early race for Black Caucus support Congress needs to repeal the 2002 Iraq Authorization for Use of Military Force MORE (Calif.), Ilhan OmarIlhan OmarTrump: Ocasio-Cortez being ‘very disrespectful’ to Pelosi Hannity invites Ocasio-Cortez to join primetime show for full hour Democrats rush to support Pelosi amid fight with Ocasio-Cortez MORE (Minn.), Mark PocanMark William PocanDemocrats rush to support Pelosi amid fight with Ocasio-Cortez Pelosi says she’s done talking about fight with ‘Squad’ The Hill’s Morning Report – 2020 jitters hit both parties in the Senate MORE (Wis.), Ayanna PressleyAyanna PressleyTrump: Ocasio-Cortez being ‘very disrespectful’ to Pelosi Hannity invites Ocasio-Cortez to join primetime show for full hour Live coverage: House Oversight examines Trump family separation policy MORE (Mass.) and Rashida TlaibRashida Harbi TlaibTrump: Ocasio-Cortez being ‘very disrespectful’ to Pelosi Hannity invites Ocasio-Cortez to join primetime show for full hour Live coverage: House Oversight examines Trump family separation policy MORE (Mich.).

Democrats needed to win support from every faction of their party to pass the bill after Republicans threatened to withhold their support over what they saw as an NDAA that doesn’t invest enough in the military.

Click Here: highlanders rugby gear world

No Republicans voted in support of the bill Friday. The White House threatened to veto the bill earlier this week.

Republicans argue the defense budget should be $750 billion, citing testimony from defense officials on the need for 3 to 5 percent year-over-year budget growth.

Republicans were also deeply opposed to several policy provisions, including ones related to the border, nuclear weapons and Guantanamo Bay.

“Unfortunately, this year in the House we spent a lot of time on messaging bills that are never going to be considered by the Senate, never will get to the president,” House Armed Services Committee ranking member Rep. Mac ThornberryWilliam (Mac) McClellan ThornberryOvernight Defense: Dems confident defense bill will pass despite party infighting | GOP chairman’s bill would review US, Saudi ties | Senators briefed on sexual assault allegation against top general Democrats voice confidence Pentagon bill will survive party squabbling Dem tensions snag defense bill MORE (R-Texas) said on the House floor. “I don’t want the NDAA to turn into a messaging bill where we can go home and brag about something we voted but those provisions have no chance of becoming law.” 

The House will now have to reconcile its version of the bill with the Senate’s. The Senate passed its version 86-8 last month without any of the progressive amendments that made it into the House version, potentially complicating negotiations on the final bill.

Updated 2:22 p.m.