House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOvernight Health Care: Pelosi pushes for drug pricing measure | South Africa to resume administering Johnson & Johnson vaccine | Early data indicate Pfizer, Moderna vaccines safe for pregnant women Allow a vote on the ‘Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act’ Female Republicans ‘horrified’ by male GOP lawmaker’s description of Cheney: report MORE (D-Calif.) has offered a plan for a bipartisan 9/11-style commission to review the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, backtracking from an earlier proposal that would have allowed Democrats to appoint the majority of the commission’s members.

A source familiar with the discussions told The Hill Pelosi briefed members of her leadership team on the proposal Monday night after efforts to create the commission stalled in the months following the attack.

Pelosi’s plans were first reported by CNN.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have called for such a commission in the wake of the attack that left five dead, including a Capitol Police officer.

A similar commission established following the 9/11 terrorist attacks had five Democrats and five Republicans on a panel designed “to prepare a full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11 attacks.”

But the 11-member committee originally proposed by Pelosi in February would have allowed seven members to be appointed by Democrats compared to just four by Republicans.

Click Here: mens wallabies jersey

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTim Scott to deliver GOP response to Biden’s speech to Congress GOP state attorneys general urge Biden, Congress not to expand Supreme Court The Memo: Washington’s fake debate on ‘bipartisanship’ MORE (R-Ky.) previously blasted Pelosi’s original draft.

“An inquiry with a hard-wired partisan slant would never be legitimate in the eyes of the American people. An undertaking that is uneven or unjust would not help our country,” McConnell said in February.

But clashes have also arisen over the scope of the committee.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pelosi has sought to keep the commission narrowly focused on events leading up to the attack on Jan. 6, while the GOP has pushed to cover violent protests in general, echoing previous complaints about Black Lives Matter protestors.

McConnell’s office said he had yet to see Pelosi’s proposal.

“The scope of it needs to deal with a little bit broader than just January the 6th. We’ve also had a number of violent disturbances around the country last year and I think we ought to look at this in a broader scope and with a totally balanced 9/11 style commission,” McConnell told reporters Tuesday. 

Calls to establish a commission have only grown amid the delay. A coalition of 140 national security leaders who served under Democratic and Republican administrations sent a letter to lawmakers earlier this month seeking to reignite the discussion. 

“The events of January 6th exposed severe vulnerabilities in the nation’s preparedness for preventing and responding to domestic terrorist attacks. The immediate security failings that permitted a lethal breach of the Capitol Complex by armed extremists raise serious questions and demand immediate solutions,” they wrote.

“Understanding how these forces culminated in an attack on the infrastructure of our democracy is critical to preventing future attacks.”

President BidenJoe BidenTulane adds Hunter Biden as guest speaker on media polarization Trump discussing resumption of MAGA rallies: report Biden’s unavoidable foreign policy crisis MORE called the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol an “existential crisis,” stressing that while American democracy survived, “the struggle is far from over.”

“The insurrection was an existential crisis — a test of whether our democracy could survive. It did,” Biden said Wednesday at his first address before a joint session of Congress.

“But the struggle is far from over. The question of whether our democracy will long endure is both ancient and urgent.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Biden noted that the riot — which left five dead and the Capitol surrounded by new fencing and a National Guard presence — has hurt the country’s image abroad, particularly as rivals like Russia and China seek to dominate the world stage.

Biden noted that adversaries “are betting we can’t” overcome the divisions that led to the attack.

Click Here: kangaroos rugby jersey

“They look at the images of the mob that assaulted this Capitol as proof that the sun is setting on American democracy,” he said. “But they’re wrong. You know it; I know it. But we have to prove them wrong.”

Biden’s speech comes after Capitol Police said continued heightened security at the Capitol was necessary due to intelligence that some militia groups that attacked the Capitol threatened to “blow up” the complex during the joint address.

The address was given to a sparse audience compared with past years, largely due to the pandemic.

The Justice Department has charged more than 400 people in connection with the riot, with investigators largely zeroing in on extremist groups like the Oath Keepers.

Shortly after the Biden administration was sworn in, the Department of Homeland Security issued a bulletin warning extremist groups continued to post an elevated threat.

“DHS is concerned these same drivers to violence will remain through early 2021 and some DVEs may be emboldened by the January 6, 2021 breach of the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, D.C. to target elected officials and government facilities,” the agency wrote, using shorthand for domestic violent extremists.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said Thursday that it has opened over two dozen investigations into Tesla crashes, according to a report from Reuters.

Twenty-eight investigations have been opened into Tesla crashes, 23 of which remain active, according to the wire service. 

Four of the probes into the electric vehicle crashes have been completed. Three of the crashes have occurred in recent weeks. 

ADVERTISEMENT

In a statement to The Hill, the NHTSA said that it was “aware” of a crash that occurred in Houston, Texas, involving a Tesla vehicle. 

“We are actively engaged with local law enforcement and Tesla to learn more about the details of the crash and will take appropriate steps when we have more information,” the agency said.

The news of multiple investigations comes after NHTSA announced this week that it would be investigating a Tesla crash in Michigan after state police said an electric vehicle crashed into a patrol car. 

Another crash in March in Detroit was more severe. A Tesla was wedged under a tractor trailer, and left the driver in critical condition. Authorities maintained that the car’s autopilot function was not in use, according to the outlet. 

Tesla has previously advised drivers to keep their hands on the steering wheel while driving with the autopilot feature.

Click Here: Sweden soccer tracksuit

Since 2016, there have been three fatal Tesla crashes involving autopilot, according to Reuters. 

ADVERTISEMENT

In July, NHSTA’s Special Crash Investigation team had looked into 19 Tesla crashes where they believe some form of advanced driver assistance system was engaged at the time of the incident. 

The agency said that the system doesn’t make the Tesla capable of driving itself. 

“The most advanced vehicle technologies available for purchase today provide driver assistance and require a fully attentive human driver at all times performing the driving task and monitoring the surrounding environment,” NHSTA said. 

The Hill has reached out to Tesla for comment. 

Updated 10:19 p.m.

Republicans say fiscal conservatism simply isn’t the GOP rallying cry it used to be, and that’s making it much harder to counter President BidenJoe BidenEmmer: Vulnerable Democrats who vote to raise taxes will lose in 2022 West Virginia to offer coronavirus vaccines to attendees of state basketball tournament US has started preparing to withdraw from Afghanistan, top general says MORE’s push for trillions of dollars in new government spending.

Instead, culture war issues like immigration, religious freedom, LGBTQ rights, Big Tech and the Black Lives Matter movement are taking center stage in conservative politics. 

The initial shift in Republican political priorities away from belt-tightening coincided with the demise of the Tea Party, the dominant force in the 2010 midterm elections, and the rise of now-former President TrumpDonald TrumpEmmer: Vulnerable Democrats who vote to raise taxes will lose in 2022 Joe Cunningham to enter race for South Carolina governor US has started preparing to withdraw from Afghanistan, top general says MORE, who presided over an $8 trillion increase in the national debt.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now, Republicans are having a tough time generating the same outrage over Biden’s multitrillion-dollar spending agenda as they did over former President Obama’s signature initiatives: the American Relief and Reinvestment Act and the Affordable Care Act, which cost far less than what Biden is proposing on infrastructure.

Senate Republican Whip John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneEmmer: Vulnerable Democrats who vote to raise taxes will lose in 2022 GOP sees immigration as path to regain power Senate GOP keeps symbolic earmark ban MORE (S.D.) said “unfortunately” fiscal concerns are “probably” not as important to the GOP base as 10 years ago and that Trump helped transform the party’s priorities. 

“It wasn’t something that was an important issue for President Trump, and so many of our base voters align themselves with President Trump. It’s almost like now debt, deficits, spending become abstract issues that a lot of folks aren’t paying attention to and should be,” he said. 

There was a “political evolution,” Thune said, and the fiscal conservatism that was a core tenet of the Tea Party “got displaced … by the more populist elements” of the Republican Party.

He went on to say that while Trump was able to energize voters by hitting on hot-button cultural topics, such as immigration and border security, it’s now time for the GOP to get back to its traditional stance on fiscal issues. 

“I’m frankly very concerned about the level of spending and debt, and I think Republicans have got to be the adults in the room and exercise the fiscal responsibility that seems to have been absent, lacking the last several years,” Thune said. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiThe Republicans’ deep dive into nativism Manchin says he would endorse GOP Sen. Murkowski in reelection bid The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – Chauvin conviction puts renewed focus on police reform MORE (R-Alaska), a central player in the Senate immigration negotiations, said the party is “kind of different” compared to the early years of the Obama administration.

Tea Party fiscal conservatism is now “hard to find,” she said, adding that the party base is “more strongly conservative on some of the social issues.” 

“Who is the party of fiscal restraint anymore?” she asked.

Former Speaker John BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerThe Republicans’ deep dive into nativism In Congress, minority shoves get major majority pushback Cantor: ‘Level of craziness’ in Washington has increased ‘on both sides’ MORE (R-Ohio) criticized House conservatives in his new book, “On the House: A Washington Memoir,” for abandoning their Tea Party principles during Trump’s four years in office. 

“None of these guys said anything when the Trump administration added $1 trillion to the federal budget deficit by the end of 2019 — before a single dime was spent on COVID-19 relief,” he wrote.

“They were rubber stamps for it in Congress. Many of them who raised huge stinks about [the Troubled Asset Relief Program] were only too happy to let Trump bail out farmers hurt by his trade war with China,” he added, referring to the $700 billion measure that Congress passed in October of 2008 to prop up the nation’s financial system.

The shift in political priorities was even more apparent last month when the House Republican conference voted by secret ballot to lift the ban on earmarks it had enacted in March of 2010, when the Tea Party was on the rise. 

The Senate last week voted to keep a symbolic earmark ban in place with the understanding the GOP conference rule would not be binding and members would be free to request earmarks for their home states.

“Here’s the sad reality: Almost nobody in Washington, Republican or Democrat, cares much about the debt, but lots of grandstanders care a lot about who racks up that debt,” said Sen. Ben SasseBen SasseHillicon Valley: Facebook, Twitter, YouTube execs to testify at Senate hearing on algorithms | Five big players to watch in Big Tech’s antitrust fight Senators introduce legislation to protect critical infrastructure against attack Senate GOP keeps symbolic earmark ban MORE (R-Neb.). 

“Most folks are OK with deficits just as long as it’s their party that gets the short-term political advantage of claiming to be saviors shoveling cash. I don’t care if you’re a Republican or a Democrat, the math is the math,” he added.

Sasse brought a chart to a Republican conference meeting Wednesday, during which he and his colleagues discussed allowing earmarks to return, showing the ratio of public debt to gross domestic product (GDP) now stands at nearly 100 percent and is due to rise to 114 percent by 2030.

That is projected to exceed the record debt-to-GDP ratio set in 1946 after World War II.

ADVERTISEMENT

The national debt stood at $19.9 trillion when Trump took office in 2017 and hit $28 trillion last month. 

Republicans are trying to revive fiscal concerns as they push back against Biden’s $2.3 trillion infrastructure proposal but are having trouble gaining traction.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellThe Republicans’ deep dive into nativism Corporations can – and must – fight for voting rights Ron Johnson questions ‘big push’ to vaccinate ‘everybody’ MORE (R-Ky.) this past week touted a $568 billion Republican-proposed infrastructure plan as a “more modest” alternative to Biden’s and warned of the mounting debt. 

“It’s one thing to run up the national debt when you have a hundred-year pandemic but just to keep routinely adding trillions of dollars to the national debt I think is ill-advised for the future of the country,” he said last week.

Republicans want to pay for their plan by repurposing money sent out to state and local governments in Biden’s $1.9 trillion pandemic relief plan, setting user fees and tapping the Highway Trust Fund. 

Yet polls have shown strong support for Biden’s plans to spend trillions of dollars to turbocharge the economy, a course he settled on after Democrats concluded that the $787 billion stimulus package passed in the early months of Obama’s first term did not do enough to get the economy back on track after the Great Recession.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senior White House adviser Anita Dunn last month circulated a Navigator Research poll showing that 59 percent of Americans support Biden’s infrastructure agenda and that 83 percent support his desire to expand access to child care and investments in clean energy infrastructure, which are not highlighted in the alternative GOP proposal. 

A Politico-Morning Consult poll from this month showed strong support among Republicans, Democrats and independents for Biden’s infrastructure spending priorities, and 65 percent of voters were on board with raising the corporate tax rate to help pay for them. The survey even found that 42 percent of Republicans favored raising taxes on corporations.

Steven S. Smith, a professor of political science at Washington University in St. Louis, said that Republican warnings of 10 and 12 years ago that Obama’s agenda would fuel inflation never panned out, undercutting the potency of fiscal conservatism as a political message.

“The Republican argument of 2009 that this massive increase in federal spending is going to cause a disastrous inflation, it simply isn’t an argument that holds water with most economists or the general public,” he said. “That’s important context.”

“We never experienced much inflation, still aren’t experiencing much inflation and yet have another economic downturn with massive unemployment and underemployment. And I think the public buys the argument the government has an essential role in recovery,” he added.

The lack of staunch opposition among Republican voters to Biden’s economic agenda makes it trickier for Senate Republicans to oppose, especially when winning back the majority means securing victories in purple states like Georgia, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

ADVERTISEMENT

Republicans as a whole — from lawmakers in Washington to mainstream GOP voters and conservative activists — were much more unified against Obama’s health care agenda in 2009 than they are against Biden’s spending plans.

Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyTensions rise as Democrats face Senate bottleneck on agenda We need laws to stop gun violence, but we need to stop glorifying it, too Senators in the dark on parliamentarian’s decision MORE (D-Conn.) said the fact that GOP senators are now “spending serious time putting serious proposals” is a good sign, praising their $568 billion infrastructure offer as “meaningful.” 

“Republicans are not spending their time eviscerating the infrastructure bill like they did the Affordable Care Act. They’re spending their time explaining how they would do it differently, and that’s constructive,” he said, noting the differences between now and 12 years ago.

Scott Wong contributed.

Click Here: new zealand rugby team jerseys

Intelligence leaders warned Wednesday of growing threats from China and domestic terrorism fueled by misinformation on social media at a hearing on worldwide threats to the nation.

Members of the Senate Intelligence Committee grilled Director of National Intelligence Avril HainesAvril HainesOvernight Defense: Biden officially rolls out Afghanistan withdrawal plan | Probe finds issues with DC Guard helicopter use during June protests Hillicon Valley: Intel leaders push for breach notification law | Coinbase goes public Sept. 11 victims call for release of FBI report detailing Saudi Arabia’s involvement in attacks MORE, along with the leaders of the CIA, FBI and National Security Agency, on threats ranging from pulling troops out of Afghanistan, to disinformation and domestic terrorism, to cyberattacks. 

The hearing, which lasted just under three hours and was mostly bipartisan in nature, stood in stark contrast to the last worldwide threats briefing in 2019, when intelligence leaders testified on issues including election interference and North Korean nuclear threats that contradicted some of former President TrumpDonald TrumpTrump mocks Murkowski, Cheney election chances Race debate grips Congress US reentry to Paris agreement adds momentum to cities’ sustainability efforts MORE’s stances. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The worldwide threats hearing was abandoned under the Trump administration.

Click Here: Portugal football tracksuit

The threats discussed during the hearing and detailed in the 2021 Worldwide Threats Assessment released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence centered on China, Russia, Iran and North Korea.

“I would venture to guess that 90 something percent, if not more, of our threats can be tracked to one of five things: China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, or global terrorism,” said Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioThe Memo: Biden puts 9/11 era in rear view Intelligence leaders push for mandatory breach notification law Intelligence leaders warn of threats from China, domestic terrorism MORE (Fla.), the panel’s ranking Republican.

“Those five sources comprise a substantial percentage of all the challenges we face,” he added.

Threats from China, particularly in the area of technological competition, were a major focus of both the annual assessment and questions Wednesday.

“I don’t think there is any country that presents a more severe threat to our innovation, our economic security and our democratic ideas,” said FBI Director Christopher Wray. He at one point said a new investigation is opened related to China every 10 hours.

ADVERTISEMENT

Haines described China as an “unparalleled priority for the Intelligence Community,” describing it as “increasingly a near-peer competitor” to the United States. 

Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerIntelligence leaders push for mandatory breach notification law Intelligence leaders warn of threats from China, domestic terrorism Wray: FBI opens investigation into China every 10 hours MORE (D-Va.) and other senators stressed that concerns around the Chinese government’s policies were completely separate from the Chinese people or Chinese Americans, particularly after increased discrimination against Asian Americans. 

“I want to caution our fellow Americans that false equivalencies only breed suspicion, division, and hate … and play right into Beijing’s hands,” Warner said.

Domestic terrorism also played a bigger role in the hearing after the Jan. 6 mob attack on the Capitol.

Wray warned that the echo chamber of social media was exacerbating the problem.

“Social media has become, in many ways, the key amplifier to domestic violence extremism, just as it has for malign foreign influence,” he said. 

“People need to understand better what information is that they’re reading,” he added. “A great level of discerning skepticism is a crucial ingredient, not just to protect from foreign misinformation, but also from violent extremism. There is all sorts of stuff out there on the internet that poses as fact, which just isn’t.”

Wray was criticized by Sen. Martin HeinrichMartin Trevor HeinrichIntelligence leaders warn of threats from China, domestic terrorism Top academics slam Puerto Rico Self-Determination Act Groups petition EPA to remove ethane and methane from list of compounds exempt from emissions limits MORE (D-N.M.) during the hearing for failing to release a report the FBI compiled on QAnon, a far-right conspiracy alleging there is global child sex-trafficking ring that plotted against President Trump while he was in office.

“Why is it that you cannot or won’t tell the American people directly about the threat that adherence to the QAnon conspiracy theory presents?” Heinrich said. 

The FBI has previously resisted pushes from Democrats to focus more directly on the political and racial beliefs of those it investigates.

Wray said the FBI has to be careful to stay focused on activity that could spur violence or violate federal law.

“That doesn’t mean that rhetoric isn’t a societal problem that doesn’t need to be addressed,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Warner opened the hearing by emphasizing the need for transparency with the public on threats to national security, criticizing former Trump administration intelligence leaders for not testifying on these issues. 

“I was dismayed last year when the Director of National Intelligence refused to appear in public before our committee for this hearing and I am pleased that we are resuming this annual tradition,” Warner said after describing the importance of such hearings.

Some lawmakers during the hearing pushed for intelligence agencies to have greater authority to block malicious actors, something agencies have resisted in light of civil liberty concerns.

Sen. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten GillibrandIntelligence leaders warn of threats from China, domestic terrorism Jon Stewart accuses VA of being ‘an obstacle’ to burn pits medical care Family policy that could appeal to the right and the left MORE (D-N.Y.) referenced foreign efforts to undermine everything ranging from infrastructure to elections.

“These are serious, serious issues, and I don’t like hearing that we have blind spots,” she said.

The intelligence leaders will return to Capitol Hill on Thursday to testify on the same wide variety of threats before the House Intelligence Committee. 

Ghislaine Maxwell, who is accused of helping Jeffrey Epstein in his sex trafficking of minors, on Friday pleaded not guilty to two recent charges in connection with the case. 

The British socialite appeared before a New York judge in person for the first time Friday, where she entered a not guilty plea for a sex trafficking conspiracy charge, as well as an additional sex trafficking charge, which were both added to a sweeping indictment late last month. 

Maxwell now faces eight counts in connection with allegedly helping carry out a sex trafficking scheme by close confidant and one-time boyfriend Epstein, who killed himself while awaiting trial in jail in August 2019. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Maxwell was previously charged with four counts related to conspiracy to entice minors to travel and engage in illegal sex acts and two counts of perjury for allegedly lying to prosecutors.

Click Here: Pumas UNAM soccer tracksuit

The 59-year-old had pleaded not guilty to the previous charges, as well. 

The Associated Press reported that Maxwell’s lawyers on Friday attempted to argue that they needed additional time to prepare their defense as a result of the new charges. Maxwell’s trial is currently scheduled for a July 12 start date. 

However, prosecutors have pushed back on this request, arguing that the new charges only relate to a single victim in addition to the three victims already included in the case. 

The judge Friday said that she wants to avoid a delayed trial, but did not announce any official decision on the matter. 

One of Maxwell’s attorneys had requested an in-person hearing Friday citing “media coverage” and a “debacle” that occurred during a remote hearing for another related civil case. 

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the AP, the lawyer said that members of the public had crowded a line provided by the court for people to listen to the remote hearing.  

The original indictment filed against Maxwell accused her of participating in a series of illegal actions from 1994 to 1997, with the most recent indictment adding additional instances of alleged criminal activity between 2001 and 2004. 

The fourth victim recently added to the case, who was 14 years old at the time of the alleged activities, was recruited  to “provide Epstein with sexualized massages” at his Palm Beach residence and was paid by Epstein or his associates, including Maxwell, according to the indictment. 

Prosecutors have accused Maxwell of encouraging the victims “to engage in sexual acts with Epstein through multiple means,” despite allegedly knowing that the victims were under 18. 

Last month, Maxwell was denied bail for a third time after prosecutors argued that she continued to pose an “extreme flight risk.”

Aux dernières nouvelles, Mischa Barton et James Abercrombie avaient rompu. Le couple s’est reformé, pour le plus grand bonheur des fans de l’actrice. Les amoureux font tout pour que leur romance perdure, jusqu’à porter des chaussures identiques…

Mischa et James étaient de sortie ce lundi 7 octobre 2019. Ils ont été aperçus dans le quartier de Bel-Air à Los Angeles, profitant d’une journée ensoleillée pour faire du shopping. L’ex-héroïne de la série Newport Beach et son compagnon se sont notamment rendus au magasin Towne by Elyse Walker.

Pour cette sortie à deux, Mischa et James avaient accordé leurs tenues ; ils portaient tous les deux des mocassins Gucci noirs.

Click Here: nrl league merchandise

Angèle voit rouge pour la réédition de son album à succès, Brol. Exit le fond bleu, la bouille d’enfant de la talentueuse chanteuse belge est cernée d’une couleur pourpre pour la sortie de sept nouveaux titres inédits. C’est cette couleur qu’elle a choisie comme fond de sa session Colors où elle a dévoilé Perdus, le 10 octobre 2019. Elle avait déjà fait un tour dans le studio berlinois, où elle avait interprété Ta reine, l’une des vidéos les plus vues de la chaîne.

Dans ce titre résolument plus mélancolique, voire triste, que ce qu’elle avait l’habitude de chanter, Angèle évoque sa rupture avec Léo Walk, un talentueux danseur. “Perdus, tous ces gens m’avaient prévenue, on descend, on l’a voulu. (…) On s’ennuie fort, on se tue. (…) Je vais avoir l’habitude, mais ces derniers mois, j’ai flanché loin de toi, loin de moi. Sans prendre la mesure de ce qui m’arrivait et c’est arrivé sans le voir venir. Notoriété oblige, j’y prends bien du plaisir même si j’y perds ma liberté. Vouloir trop réussir, la pression du succès“, chante-t-elle, évoquant son succès fulgurant depuis la sortie de Brol en octobre 2018.

Click Here: Bape Kid 1st Camo Ape Face star tee

Pour rappel, après plus de deux ans de relation, Angèle et Léo Walk s’étaient séparés en mai 2019. “Ça me manque, les jours tendres du début. À s’aimer pour la première fois. Loin de nous, loin de nous, loin de nous. Ni l’un ni l’autre n’ira“, chante Angèle en fin de morceau.

La réédition de cet album est très attendue par les fans d’Angèle. En avril dernier, nos confrères de PureCharts annonçaient que Brol avait été certifié triple disque de platine en France, avec 300 000 ventes. Après son feat ultradiffusé, Tout oublier, avec son frère Roméo Elvis, Angèle s’apprête à dévoiler une collaboration avec Kiddy Smile sur Que du love, ainsi que la version orchestrale de Ta reine. Encore un peu de patience, la sortie de Brol, la suite, est prévue pour le 8 novembre 2019.

Brol, la suite. Rdition disponible en pr-commande avec 7 titres indits. Sortie le 8 novembre 2019 (lien en bio)

Une publication partage par Angle (@angele_vl) le 9 Oct. 2019 9 :01 PDT