Efforts to secure elections likely to gain ground in Democrat-controlled Congress

Efforts to boost election security are likely to gain traction in the new Congress, as Democrats who have pushed for election reform take control of both chambers and the White House.  

The aftermath of a contentious presidential race could also bolster Republican support for new measures to secure U.S. elections, though divisions still exist on how far each party is willing to go.

“I think there is room for legislation, I think there is room for that to get a vote, but it’s important for people to work together, it’s important for people to recognize that we can improve our democracy,” Benjamin Hovland, the chairman of the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), told The Hill Monday. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Election security has been a hotly debated topic on Capitol Hill in the years since the 2016 presidential election, when Russian agents launched a hacking and disinformation campaign aimed at swaying the election towards now-President TrumpDonald TrumpHouse GOP leader tells members to quit spreading lies on riot, antifa DC attorney general says Trump Organization improperly paid K bill incurred during inauguration 70K QAnon Twitter accounts suspended in the wake of Capitol riot MORE

The issue gained further attention in October, when federal officials revealed that Iran and Russia were seeking to interfere in the 2020 presidential election, including through spoofed voter intimidation emails. 

Over $800 million has been approved on a bipartisan basis by Congress since 2018 to help states shore up election security, with Hovland noting that these funds, on top of elections-related appropriations in the COVID-19 omnibus bill signed into law early last year, went a long way towards helping officials put on a secure election. 

But Democrats and Republicans have largely butted heads on steps necessary, beyond funding, to ensure elections were safe from foreign interference, with Republicans often raising concerns that legislation proposed by Democrats may serve to federalize elections.

With the House and Senate controlled by opposing parties, Congress was largely unable to address election security concerns beyond funding. But as power shifts to Democrats on Capitol Hill and in the White House, key senators are already planning to make a new push for election reform and security legislation.

“Free and fair elections are central to our Democracy and our identity as Americans, which is why I’m going to continue working to ensure that our elections remain safe, transparent, and free from foreign influence,” Sen. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerBiden announces veteran diplomat William Burns as nominee for CIA director Senate Democrat tells Facebook to preserve digital evidence from Capitol riot Hillicon Valley: Facebook extends Trump’s suspension at least until Inauguration Day | Trump deletes tweets that led to Twitter lockout | Federal judiciary likely compromised as part of SolarWinds hack MORE (D-Va.), the incoming Senate Intelligence Committee chairman, told The Hill on Monday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Warner said he planned to throw his weight behind the Honest Ads Act, legislation he introduced in 2019 alongside Sens. Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharTwo Senate committees vow probe of security failure during Capitol riots Colbert asks Republicans ‘have you had enough?’ in live show after Capitol violence Late-night hosts announce plans to discuss Capitol violence MORE (D-Minn.) and Lindsay Graham (R-S.C.) that aimed to fight foreign interference through increasing the transparency of election advertisements on social media platforms.

“This is not a Republican or a Democratic issue,” Warner said. “This is about increasing public transparency and making sure that our adversaries cannot use our own technology platforms to interfere in our election or undermine our democracy.” 

A spokesperson for Klobuchar, the incoming chair of the Senate Rules Committee, told The Hill that she will focus on a range of issues to boost election security, including supporting the Honest Ads Act, enhancing cybersecurity and modernizing election infrastructure, and increasing paper ballots and audits.

“Some of my key priorities as the Chair of the Rules Committee – which has jurisdiction over federal elections – will be to make voting easier and more secure and to halt the flood of special interest and dark money that is drowning out the voices of the American people,” Klobuchar told The Hill in a statement. 

Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenBiden announces veteran diplomat William Burns as nominee for CIA director Houston Chronicle calls on Cruz to resign Biden says Cruz, other Republicans responsible for ‘big lie’ that fueled Capitol mob MORE (D-Ore.), the incoming chair of the Senate Finance Committee and an election security advocate, told The Hill that he was “urging” colleagues to make the topic a “top priority” this year. 

“Reforming our elections is essential to making American democracy more representative of our citizens, and to providing confidence that elections are legitimate,” Wyden said.  

Democrats may not be alone in their efforts to secure elections, particularly after a heated presidential election that left many Americans distrustful of the process due to debunked and unsubstantiated claims about widespread voter fraud and interference. 

Sen. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonColbert asks Republicans ‘have you had enough?’ in live show after Capitol violence Republican infighting on election intensifies Chamber of Commerce slams GOP effort to challenge Biden’s win MORE (R-Wis.), the outgoing chair of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said last month at a committee hearing that “oversight into election security should continue into the next Congress” in order to restore confidence. 

Sen. James LankfordJames Paul LankfordTexas Democrats Joaquin and Julián Castro call for Cruz to step down Congress rejects challenge to Arizona’s presidential vote Hawley to still object to Pennsylvania after Capitol breached MORE (R-Okla.), one of the key Republicans who has worked with Democrats in the past on election security issues, advocated for further work on the topic during a floor speech last week following the storming of the U.S. Capitol by pro-Trump rioters. 

“I’ve said before and I’ll keep saying that good election administration is not about partisanship,” Hovland, who was nominated by President Trump, said. 

Outside the halls of the Capitol, President-elect Joe BidenJoe BidenCapitol Police confirm investigation into some officers’ behavior during riot GOP lawmakers told Trump takes some responsibility for Capitol riot Director of Army Staff disputes Capitol Police chief account of National Guard deployment MORE has separately vowed to push back against foreign election interference. 

Biden said in a statement last year that he would “treat foreign interference in our election as an adversarial act,” and promised to move resources towards key election security-focused agencies including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“In spite of President Trump’s failure to act, America’s adversaries must not misjudge the resolve of the American people to counter every effort by a foreign power to interfere in our democracy,” Biden said last year. 

The Trump administration has taken a number of steps to hold foreign adversaries accountable for election interference, including levying sanctions against Russia and approving security funding for states. 

However, Trump himself has been criticized for not pushing back strongly enough against Russian actions, particularly following a 2018 press conference in Helsinki with Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinBiden’s Day 1 Russia problem Warner says foreign adversaries ‘gained more’ from Capitol riot than from SolarWinds hack McMaster: Trump ‘compromised our principles’ for ‘personal gain’ MORE when Trump initially refused to denounce Russian interference in the 2016 election. 

With Biden’s announcement that he was “putting the Kremlin and other foreign governments on notice” around election interference, policy towards Russia looks likely to harden. 

“There is no question that we need an executive that is clear-eyed about the threat of foreign interference in elections, and we need a Congress that can conduct oversight,” David Levine, a former Idaho election official who currently serves as an elections integrity fellow at the Alliance for Securing Democracy, told The Hill on Monday.  

The issue of securing elections has gained even more momentum in the wake the storming of the U.S. Capitol last week, with rioters spurred on by election fraud concerns.  

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have neither the time nor the bandwidth nor the know-how to deal effectively with misinformation and disinformation about our elections, so I am really hoping that going forward we are laser focused on actual vulnerabilities and how to address them,” Levine said. 

The new Congress has already taken the first major step this year towards making election changes through the reintroduction of the For the People Act in the House by Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiMan seen carrying Pelosi’s lectern during Capitol riot released on K bail Trump and Pence speak for first time since Capitol riots FBI seeks assistance identifying Capitol rioter who carried Confederate flag MORE (D-Calif.), House Administration Committee Chair Zoe LofgrenZoe Ellen LofgrenCapitol Police chief announces resignation after pro-Trump riots Congress affirms Biden win after rioters terrorize Capitol Capitol Police face heat following mob breach MORE (D-Calif.), and Rep. John SarbanesJohn Peter Spyros SarbanesEfforts to secure elections likely to gain ground in Democrat-controlled Congress Former Md. senator Paul Sarbanes dies at 87 Democrats were united on top issues this Congress — but will it hold? MORE (D-Md.). 

The bill, approved by the Democrat-controlled House last Congress, is a sweeping piece of legislation that would take numerous steps to reform and secure elections, including boosting paper ballots and voting rights.  

Beyond the election legislation efforts, Hovland said officials are advocating that Congress consider approving a consistent funding stream to give certainty to election officials working to enhance election security. 

The EAC chairman noted that with both funding and legislation, timing was of the essence. 

“Any substantial change, you never want to try to implement that in an election year,” Hovland said. “A little bit of runway to get new things going is helpful…it’s always important to be aware of the clock and where people are in the election cycle.”

Duckworth demands Pentagon investigate whether troops participated in Capitol riots

Sen. Tammy DuckworthLadda (Tammy) Tammy DuckworthOvernight Defense: National Guard boosts DC presence ahead of inauguration | Lawmakers demand probes into troops’ role in Capitol riot | Financial disclosures released for Biden Pentagon nominee Duckworth demands Pentagon investigate whether troops participated in Capitol riots Freshman GOP lawmaker apologizes for Hitler quote MORE (D-Ill.) is demanding the Pentagon investigate allegations that service members and military retirees were among those who participated in Wednesday’s attack on the Capitol.

In a letter to acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller on Monday, Duckworth asked that he “immediately” direct each military branch’s criminal investigation service to work with the FBI and Capitol Police to determine whether active-duty troops or retirees “engaged in insurrection against the authority of the United States, or participated in a seditious conspiracy that used force to: oppose the authority of the United States; prevent, hinder and delay the execution of the Electoral Count Act; and unlawfully seize, take or possess property of the United States.”

“If accurate, it would be a disgraceful insult to the vast majority of servicemembers who honorably serve our Nation in accordance with the core values of their respective Services,” Duckworth, an Iraq War veteran, said of reports on the involvement of service members and veterans in the Capitol siege.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Upholding good order and discipline demands that the U.S. Armed Forces root out extremists that infiltrate the military and threaten our national security,” she added, urging Miller to take action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice if any service members or retirees are identified.

Military retirees can be recalled to active status and court martialed in some circumstances.

A retired Air Force lieutenant colonel, Larry Rendall Brock Jr., was arrested Sunday in Texas and charged by federal prosecutors with one count of knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, as well as one count of violent entry and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds.

Brock had been photographed on the Senate floor Wednesday wearing a Kevlar helmet and flak jacket with military patches and holding plastic zip-ties used by law enforcement as handcuffs.

The Army is also reportedly investigating an active-duty psychological operations officer who led a group of people from North Carolina to the rally that preceded the deadly riot, though she insisted to The Associated Press that neither she nor anyone in her group entered the Capitol.

ADVERTISEMENT

The officer, Capt. Emily Rainey, reportedly already submitted her resignation in September after she was disciplined for tearing down caution tape at a playground that was closed under North Carolina’s COVID-19 restrictions. But because the process to separate an officer can take months, she is not officially due to leave the Army until April.

Duckworth’s letter is the latest effort from lawmakers seeking answers from the Pentagon after President TrumpDonald TrumpHouse GOP leader tells members to quit spreading lies on riot, antifa DC attorney general says Trump Organization improperly paid K bill incurred during inauguration 70K QAnon Twitter accounts suspended in the wake of Capitol riot MORE incited a mob to overrun the Capitol while Congress was meeting to certify Joe BidenJoe BidenCapitol Police confirm investigation into some officers’ behavior during riot GOP lawmakers told Trump takes some responsibility for Capitol riot Director of Army Staff disputes Capitol Police chief account of National Guard deployment MORE’s presidential victory.

On Sunday, Democratic Reps. Ruben GallegoRuben GallegoOvernight Defense: National Guard boosts DC presence ahead of inauguration | Lawmakers demand probes into troops’ role in Capitol riot | Financial disclosures released for Biden Pentagon nominee Duckworth demands Pentagon investigate whether troops participated in Capitol riots 25 domestic terrorism investigations opened after assault on Capitol MORE (Ariz.) and Sara Jacob (Calif.) also sent a letter to Miller asking him to direct military investigative services to work with the Justice Department to identify any active-duty troops at the riots, as well as recall to active duty retirees identified as rioters so they face military justice.

Gallego and Rep. Jason CrowJason CrowOvernight Defense: National Guard boosts DC presence ahead of inauguration | Lawmakers demand probes into troops’ role in Capitol riot | Financial disclosures released for Biden Pentagon nominee Duckworth demands Pentagon investigate whether troops participated in Capitol riots 25 domestic terrorism investigations opened after assault on Capitol MORE (D-Colo.) also sent a letter Saturday to Army Secretary Ryan McCarthyRyan McCarthyDirector of Army Staff disputes Capitol Police chief account of National Guard deployment Overnight Defense: National Guard boosts DC presence ahead of inauguration | Lawmakers demand probes into troops’ role in Capitol riot | Financial disclosures released for Biden Pentagon nominee National Guard to ramp up DC presence to at least 10,000 ahead of Biden inauguration MORE asking for a House Armed Services Committee briefing on the Pentagon and National Guard response to the siege.

Crow then spoke with McCarthy on the phone Sunday and, among other things, “raised grave concerns about reports that active duty and reserve military members were involved in the insurrection,” according to a statement on the call from Crow’s office.

“He requested expedited investigation and courts martial against those involved,” the statement said, adding that Crow also requested extra screening for “troops deployed for the inauguration to ensure that deployed members are not sympathetic to domestic terrorists. Secretary McCarthy agreed to take additional measures.”

Hillicon Valley: Parler sues Amazon, asks court to reinstate platform | Twitter stock falls after Trump ban | Facebook pauses political spending in wake of Capitol attack

Welcome to Hillicon Valley, The Hill’s newsletter detailing all you need to know about the tech and cyber news from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. If you don’t already, be sure to sign up for our newsletter with this LINK.

Welcome! Follow our cyber reporter, Maggie Miller (@magmill95), and tech team, Chris Mills Rodrigo (@chrisismills) and Rebecca Klar (@rebeccaklar_), for more coverage.

PARLER VS AMAZON: Parler sued Amazon Monday after the company’s web hosting service dropped the controversial social media platform.

ADVERTISEMENT

The lawsuit alleges that the move was politically motivated and violated antitrust law, although experts who spoke with The Hill questioned the basis of the second argument.

Amazon’s decision to cut off service to Parler came after it was used to coordinate and incite last week’s violent insurrection at the Capitol.

Apple’s App Store and the Google Play store over the weekend stopped carrying the app, which has pitched itself as a haven for free speech and attracted many conservatives.

Read more.

TWITTER’S STOCK SINKS: Twitter’s stock fell roughly 7 percent on Monday following the company’s decision Friday evening to permanently ban President TrumpDonald TrumpHouse GOP leader tells members to quit spreading lies on riot, antifa DC attorney general says Trump Organization improperly paid K bill incurred during inauguration 70K QAnon Twitter accounts suspended in the wake of Capitol riot MORE from the platform.

The financial impact came after the social media giant took the unprecedented step to close Trump’s account, saying his posts pose “the risk of further incitement of violence.”

Facebook, which did not go so far as to permanently shut Trump’s account but has banned him until at least the transfer of power, only saw about a 3 percent drop in stock Monday. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Read more here

FACEBOOK TAKES A SECOND: Facebook announced Monday that it would pause political spending in the wake of the attack on the Capitol complex last week that left multiple rioters and members of the Capitol Police dead. 

“Following last week’s awful violence in D.C., we are pausing all of our PAC contributions for at least the current quarter while we review our policies,” company spokesperson Andy Stone confirmed to The Hill.

The move by the social media giant comes amid strong pressure on companies to halt donations to members of Congress who amplified President Trump’s debunked claims that the presidential election was stolen. 

Read more about the decision here.

MERKEL WEIGHS IN: A spokesman for Angela Merkel said Monday that the German chancellor finds the Twitter ban on President Trump‘s account “problematic.”

Steffen Seibert said that while social media platforms “bear great responsibility for political communication not being poisoned by hatred, by lies and by incitement to violence,” freedom of opinion “can be intervened in, but according to the law and within the framework defined by legislators.”

“Seen from this angle, the chancellor considers it problematic that the accounts of the U.S. president have now been permanently blocked,” he added, according to The Associated Press.

Read more here

ICYMI: CYBER CZAR LIKELY TO MAKE WAVES: The creation of a White House cyber czar to help coordinate federal cybersecurity is likely to make a major difference in responding to the recently discovered Russian hack of IT group SolarWinds. 

The new national cyber director position was established by the annual National Defense Authorization Act, a massive piece of legislation that also granted numerous other cybersecurity powers to the federal government, all of which could be helpful as almost a dozen key agencies impacted by the hack scramble to respond. 

“Once this individual is appointed and confirmed, this would be the individual who is coordinating the response,” Rep. Jim LangevinJames (Jim) R. LangevinHillicon Valley: Parler sues Amazon, asks court to reinstate platform | Twitter stock falls after Trump ban | Facebook pauses political spending in wake of Capitol attack Cyber czar to draw on new powers from defense bill Senate approves defense bill establishing cyber czar position, subpoena power for cyber agency MORE (D-R.I.), one of the key members of Congress who pushed for the national cyber director position to be established, told The Hill.

Read more here.

Lighter click: The cutest bath time photo op

ADVERTISEMENT

An op-ed to chew on: Biden’s Day One Russia problem

NOTABLE LINKS FROM AROUND THE WEB:

Salesforce ‘Takes Action’ to Prevent RNC Emails From Inciting Violence (Motherboard / Jason Koebler and Joseph Cox)

Deepfake laws emerge as harassment, security threats come into focus (CyberScoop / Shannon Vavra) 

Deplatforming Our Way to the Alt-Tech Ecosystem (Knight First Amendment Institute / Ethan Zuckerman and Chand Rajendra-Nicolucci)

Planned protests spark fears of more violence in Trump's final days

Trump supporters and right-wing extremist groups are planning demonstrations that experts warn could escalate into the kind of violence seen during last week’s deadly riots at the Capitol.

Two days in particular are considered at high risk of coordinated and potentially violent activity: Jan. 17 and Inauguration Day on Jan. 20.

Trump supporters are expected to gather in Washington, D.C. and state capitals across the country on Sunday and then again three days later for the inauguration, according to law enforcement officials and experts monitoring online posts about the upcoming events. One flyer associated with Sunday’s gatherings tells participants to “come armed at your personal discretion.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Similar to Wednesday’s mob attack on the U.S. Capitol, the demonstrations are fueled by election disinformation amplified by President TrumpDonald TrumpHouse GOP leader tells members to quit spreading lies on riot, antifa DC attorney general says Trump Organization improperly paid K bill incurred during inauguration 70K QAnon Twitter accounts suspended in the wake of Capitol riot MORE and his allies.

But neither day is expected to draw the same crowd levels that stormed the Capitol.

One reason, experts say, is because unlike last week’s events, the upcoming rallies aren’t being promoted by Trump or any of his high-profile allies.

“The demonstrations on the sixth of January had a lot of political elites backing [them],” Alex Newhouse, digital research lead at the Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism at the Middlebury Institute, said. “The risks of another massive protest happening are relatively low unless those big conservatives start throwing their weight behind it again.”

Another reason experts are expecting lower attendance is the recent crackdown by social media platforms.

In addition to banning Trump, Twitter booted influential right-wing figures like “Stop the Steal” organizer Ali Alexander, Pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell and former 8kun administrator Ron Watkins.

ADVERTISEMENT

Facebook on Monday announced it would be purging all content referencing “Stop the Steal.”

And Parler, an app popular on the right for its lax content moderation, was functionally taken down over the weekend after being dropped by the Apple App Store, Google Play Store and Amazon Web Services, due in large part to its posts encouraging last week’s violence.

The lack of clear leadership and the crackdown on platforms appears to have translated to less organization for the expected upcoming demonstrations.

But the composition of the upcoming protests might be more dangerous than last week’s at the Capitol, Newhouse warned, because the groups that have been hyping them include armed militias and white nationalists.

And although there has been less logistical planning out in the open this time around, Jared Holt, a visiting research fellow at Digital Forensic Research Lab, said it’s not necessarily an indication that the demonstrations are “going to be a dud.”

“The logistical planning element is a really good indicator of attendance before events, but the absence of logistical conversations is also not an indication that nobody is going to attend the event,” he said, adding that since some participants may be demonstrating locally, it limits the need to plan hotel stays and caravans.

The recent deplatforming by social media giants may also have had the side effect of shepherding users to right-wing fringe sites where extremist movements prosper.

“What happens when millions of people who believe disinformation and lies that the democratic system has [been] totally corrupted get into these social media circles that are just brimming with people who already want to destroy the government and hurt people?” Holt said.

He added that there have been posts about a call for armed protests on Jan. 17 dating back as far as November, while in the last week or so the message has shifted to appeal more broadly to Trump supporters.

Posts pertaining to the upcoming demonstrations are appearing on platforms with limited content moderation like Telegram, MeWe and various chat rooms, researchers told The Hill.

Federal and local law enforcement have indicated they will be on high alert leading up to President-elect Joe BidenJoe BidenCapitol Police confirm investigation into some officers’ behavior during riot GOP lawmakers told Trump takes some responsibility for Capitol riot Director of Army Staff disputes Capitol Police chief account of National Guard deployment MORE’s inauguration.

The National Guard has been authorized to deploy up 15,000 members, bureau chief Gen. Daniel Hokanson announced Monday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Later that day, Trump declared an emergency in Washington, D.C. and ordered federal assistance to supplement efforts to prepare for Biden’s inauguration. The move came after D.C. Mayor Muriel BowserMuriel BowserDirector of Army Staff disputes Capitol Police chief account of National Guard deployment Trump approves DC emergency declaration ahead of Biden inauguration National Guard to ramp up DC presence to at least 10,000 ahead of Biden inauguration MORE (D) asked Trump to issue an emergency declaration amid concerns about potential threats on Jan. 20.

The FBI is also monitoring the protests, ABC News reported Monday citing an internal agency bulletin.

“The FBI received information about an identified armed group intending to travel to Washington, DC on 16 January,” the bulletin read. “They have warned that if Congress attempts to remove POTUS via the 25th Amendment, a huge uprising will occur.”

A spokesperson for the FBI did not confirm the contents of the bulletin but said the agency is supporting state, local and federal law enforcement partners with maintaining public safety.

With mounting concerns over the potential for more violence, as well as continued concerns over the spread of COVID-19, Bowser is discouraging Americans from traveling to the nation’s capital for the inauguration.

Bowser has also asked the Interior Department to cancel public gathering permits and deny further permit applications for the same time period.

ADVERTISEMENT

Special security operations surrounding the inauguration are also starting on Wednesday, earlier than previously scheduled. The decision was made “in light of events of the past week and the evolving security landscape,” Chad WolfChad WolfTrump approves DC emergency declaration ahead of Biden inauguration Acting DHS chief Chad Wolf stepping down DHS secretary says security measures tied to inauguration will begin Wednesday MORE said, just hours before he stepped down as acting Homeland Security secretary.

Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala HarrisKamala HarrisOn The Money: Wave of companies cut off donations, much of it to GOP | Wall Street braces for tougher rules under new Democratic majority | Why Biden’s diversity efforts fall flat Biden publicly receives second dose of coronavirus vaccine MORE are still set to be sworn in on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol. 

A presidential inaugural committee official said the committee is “confident in our security partners who have spent months planning and preparing for the inauguration, and we are continuing to work with them to ensure the utmost safety and security” of Biden, Vice President-elect Kamala Harris and other inauguration participants.

Biden told reporters Monday he is “not afraid to take the oath outside.”

Despite that confidence, the potential for more extremist-driven violence persists, experts warned.

“A lot of these groups view what happened on January 6th as a clear triumph of their cause,” Holt said.

Officials ousted from White House after papers casting doubt on climate science

Two controversial officials who have questioned climate science have been dismissed from the White House after they apparently published papers, which claimed to be from the administration, that promoted skepticism about climate change and its impacts. 

David Legates and Ryan Maue were ousted from the White House after the papers, which purport to be copyrighted by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), came to light. 

Office spokesperson Kristina Baum said in a statement posted on Twitter that that OSTP Director Kelvin Droegemeier “was outraged to learn of the materials that were not shared with or approved by OSTP leadership.”

 

“He first became aware of the documents when contacted by the press,” Baum said. ” As a result, Dr. Droegemeier took swift action and the individuals responsible have been relieved of their duties at OSTP.” 

 

A spokesperson confirmed to The Hill that the “individuals responsible” referred to Legates and Maue. 

The officials may return to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), where they were hired before being detailed to the White House. 

NOAA spokesperson Scott Smullen told The Hill in an email that “the actions will be reviewed under NOAA’s Scientific Integrity Policy,” but said the agency doesn’t discuss personnel matters. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“NOAA was not involved in the creation or posting online of the climate change flyers that have been allegedly attributed to the Office of Science and Technology Policy, nor does NOAA endorse the flyers. OSTP is investigating the issue,” Smullen said. 

A non-governmental website for a group called the Center for Environmental Research and Earth Science published the so-called “Climate Change Flyers.”

Legates apparently wrote an introduction to the papers, which billed them as a briefs on “the current state-of-the-science on various topics of climate change.”

And a paper casting doubt on whether human-caused climate change was conclusively impacting hurricane activity in the Atlantic was attributed to Maue. There has been research finding that climate change is making hurricanes more intense. 

One paper takes on other topics like aiming to link climate change to sun cycles, though according to NASA, recent warming is too great to be caused by the sun.

Another of the participants, University of Alabama in Huntsville research scientist Roy Spencer, also posted the papers on his website, saying that Legates asked him and others to write “brochures that supported the general view that there is no climate crisis or climate emergency.

ADVERTISEMENT

Spencer indicated on his website that Legates “hopes to be able to get these posted on the White House website by January 20…but there is no guarantee given recent events.”

Legates, who was previously a professor, has pushed the discredited theory that the sun is responsible for climate change and disputed findings by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that found that human activity is responsible for global warming. 

Maue, meanwhile, has been known to question the science connecting climate change to extreme weather events.

Updated: 9:27 p.m.

Natalya Turns Heel On SmackDown, Latest Shelly Martinez Video, Steve Austin

— After defeating A.J. in a singles match last night on SmackDown, Natalya turned heel once again, brutally attacking the Union City native. Then, after saying “Beth Phoenix, I’m with you sister,” Natalya crouched over A.J. and declared: “The days of the cute, perky little princesses are over.”

Phoenix won a No. 1 Contender’s Diva Battle Royal on the prior episode of Raw to earn a Divas Title Match against Kelly Kelly at SummerSlam. “The Glamazon” then attacked Kelly, brutally tossing her out of the ring before shouting, “Your days as the perky, cute, little bimbo are over!”

— Former WWE talent Shelly Martinez appears in the video “Getting Spanked.”

— Steve Austin’s latest movie, Tactical Force, goes on sale this Tuesday via DVD and Blu-ray.

VIDEO – Gail Kim eliminates herself from Battle Royal on Raw ->