Chloroquine : nouveaux résultats et nouvelles critiques pour Raoult

L’institut de recherche du professeur Didier Raoult à Marseille a mis en ligne le résumé d’une nouvelle étude vantant les mérites de l’hydroxychloroquine contre le coronavirus, dont la méthodologie a aussitôt suscité de nouvelles critiques du monde médical.

L’

hydroxychloroquine (dérivé de la chloroquine, un médicament contre le paludisme, NDLR) associée à l’azithromycine (un antibiotique, NDLR), administrée immédiatement après le diagnostic, est un traitement sans danger et efficace contre le Covid-19“, affirme la conclusion de cette brève pré-publication, présentée jeudi à Emmanuel Macron lors de sa visite surprise à l’Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Méditerranée Infection.1.061 patients testés positifs au nouveau coronavirus ont reçu pendant “au moins trois jours” ce traitement promu par le spécialiste des maladies infectieuses.Après 10 jours, plus de neuf sur dix (91,7%) avaient une charge virale nulle, c’est-à-dire qu’on ne trouvait plus de coronavirus dans leurs prélèvements, et cinq personnes (0,5%) sont décédées, des patients de 74 à 95 ans.Ce pourcentage est “significativement plus bas” que chez “les patients traités sous d’autres régimes à la fois à l’IHU et dans tous les hôpitaux publics marseillais“, affirme ce résumé, qui précise aussi qu'”aucune toxicité cardiaque n’a été observée“.L’intégralité de l’étude n’est pas encore rendue publique.Nombre de scientifiques saluent l’effectif important de patients inclus (contre quelque dizaines pour les précédentes) mais font valoir qu’en raison de la manière dont l’étude est élaborée, rien ne permet d’en conclure que le traitement “évite l’aggravation des symptômes et empêche la persistance du virus et la contagiosité dans la plupart des cas”, comme l’affirment les conclusions.”Malheureusement en l’absence de bras comparatif (groupe témoin recevant un placebo, NDLR), c’est extrêmement difficile de savoir si le traitement est efficace ou pas“, explique vendredi Arnaud Fontanet, épidémiologiste à l’Institut Pasteur et membre du conseil scientifique Covid-19, sur RMC/BFM TV.

Ces résultats sont juste nuls et non avenus, ça ne nous apprend rien sur l’efficacité du traitement“, s’emporte l’épidémiologiste Catherine Hill. Elle évoque elle aussi l’absence de groupe témoin et le fait que d’après les données publiques disponibles, au moins 85% des gens guérissent spontanément, sans aucun traitement.L’épidémiologiste, aujourd’hui à la retraite, pointe auprès de l’AFP un probable biais de sélection des participants, avec des patients testés positifs qui n’auraient sans doute jamais développé de symptômes, ou très légers.L’IHU propose en effet de réaliser des tests de façon large aux patients qui se présentent dans ses murs (le texte publié évoque 38.617 patients testés entre le 3 mars et le 9 avril), alors que, dans le reste du pays ces tests sont encore réservés en priorité aux cas hospitalisés et au personnel soignant.De fait, les participants de l’étude ont des formes moins graves que la moyenne des cas confirmés de Covid-19 : l’essai du Pr Raoult comprend 95% de patients dont le degré de gravité est “bas”, 2,4% de cas “moyens” et 2,6% de cas dont le degré de gravité est jugé “haut”.“Formidable légitimation”Or, selon l’analyse de plus de 70.000 malades chinois publiée le 24 février dans la revue médicale américaine Jama, 81% des cas avaient des formes cliniques modérées, 14% sévères et 5% “critiques”.Le 3 avril, l’International Society of Antimicrobial Chemiotherapy, qui avait publié la première étude du Pr Raoult, avait déjà fait part de ses préoccupations, expliquant que l’article ne correspondait pas aux “standards de qualité attendus“.L’infectiologue français est au centre d’un débat mondial sur l’utilisation de la chloroquine et de l’hydroxychloroquine pour combattre le coronavirus.Certains médecins, certains pays et des élus appellent à administrer largement ce médicament, mais une vaste partie de la communauté scientifique et des organisations sanitaires appellent à attendre une validation scientifique rigoureuse, mettant en garde contre les risques possibles pour les patients, notamment cardiaques.Un essai européen baptisé “Discovery” a été lancé dans plusieurs pays pour tester quatre traitements, dont l’hydroxycholoroquine, et d’autres études étudiant spécifiquement son efficacité ont démarré, notamment au CHU d’Angers.En attendant les résultats, la France a adopté une position prudente : l’hydroxychloroquine est autorisée à l’hôpital uniquement, et seulement pour les cas graves.Le ministre de la Santé, Olivier Véran, avait appelé le week-end dernier à ne pas brûler les étapes, estimant qu’on connaitrait prochainement les premiers résultats intermédiaires des études lancées.Si l’Elysée assure qu'”il ne faut voir aucune dimension politique” au déplacement d’Emmanuel Macron, beaucoup y voient au contraire “une formidable légitimation de ce chercheur” pourtant controversé.Dans un éditorial, la réputée revue Science s’inquiète du fait que le président français “alimente l’engouement autour d’un traitement dont l’efficacité n’est pas prouvée“.Click Here: camiseta seleccion argentina

Coronavirus : "Il n'y aura pas de pénurie" dans les magasins, affirme le PDG de Système U

"Il n’y aura pas de pénurie dans les prochains jours" et de manque de produits alimentaires dans les magasins en France en raison de l’épidémie de coronavirus, a affirmé mardi sur RTL le PDG de Système U, Dominique Schelcher.

Pâtes, riz, mouchoirs, sauces, conserves de légumes: on peut voir quelques rayons vides à certains moments mais ce n’est pas parce que les produits manquent, c’est parce que les gens ont sur-stocké, donc le temps qu’on remplisse les rayons, il peut y avoir quelques rayons vides“, a déclaré le PDG de l’enseigne qui représente quelque 11% de parts de marché dans l’Hexagone.”Mais la chaîne entre nos fournisseurs, nos entrepôts et nos magasins fonctionne normalement, il faut juste lui laisser un peu de temps parfois pour que cela se remplisse” de nouveau, a ajouté M. Schelcher dont le groupe compte quelque 1.600 points de vente via les enseignes Hyper U, Super U, U Express et Utile.”Il n’y aura pas de manque de produits dans les prochains jours. Nous, commerçants, on redit qu’il y aura pas de problème de pénurie“, a-t-il a affirmé.”Distributeurs, producteurs et industriels vont faire un communiqué commun pour rassurer et dire qu’il n’y a pas de problème“, a indiqué M. Schelcher évoquant une diffusion dans la journée. “Parfois on s’oppose, mais là, on s’unit tous“, a-t-il ajouté.  Concernant les pâtes, “nous avons dans nos entrepôts plus d’un mois de stocks de pâtes. Chez les fournisseurs il y a aussi un mois, donc ça fait deux mois, on est tranquille, si chacun reste responsable dans son comportement individuel pour ne pas se précipiter à outrance“, a dit le PDG de Système U.Il a également souligné qu’il n’y avait pas de restrictions d’achat dans les magasins de Système U, mais “des petites restrictions ponctuelles sur le +Drive+, service qui explose depuis quelques jours. On a eu +35% chez U pour le +Drive+ la semaine dernière pour quelques personnes qui ne veulent plus aller dans les magasins“, a-t-il détaillé.”Quelques personnes, parfois, ont commandé 50 boîtes de conserve, là on a dit non, on a limité“, a-t-il relevé. Selon le PDG de Système U, les “gens sont très préoccupés mais (il n’y a) pas de panique“.”L’essentiel de l’agroalimentaire français répond, et notre nourriture est fabriquée en France, ce qui n’est pas le cas de l’Angleterre qui importe beaucoup de produits“, a-t-il tenu à souligner.Click Here: Golf special

Les salariés en ont plein les bras !

Plus de 13 % des salariés souffrent de troublesmusculo-squelettiques au niveau des bras ! Et plus de lamoitié disent avoir connu ce problème l’annéepassée. C’est la conclusion d’une enquête duréseau de surveillance de ce trouble dans les pays de laLoire, coordonné par l’Institut de veille sanitaire. Cesproblèmes regroupent les tendinites de l’épaule (8 %des salariés), le syndrome me du canal carpien (4 %) et lestendinites du coude. Sans surprise, les professions les plustouchées sont les secteurs industriels tels que l’automobileou l’agroalimentaire, l’agriculture et l’administration. A noter :ces problèmes augmentent fortement avec l’âge !Après 50 ans, les tendinites sont deux fois plusfréquentes. Cette enquête va maintenant êtreétendue au niveau national, pour connaître les menacesqui pèsent sur la santé des salariésfrançais.Source : Communiqué de l’Institut de veillesanitaire, 29 novembre 2004.Click Here: camiseta river plate

On The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under $400K

Happy Friday and welcome back to On The Money. I’m Sylvan Lane, and here’s your nightly guide to everything affecting your bills, bank account and bottom line.

See something I missed? Let me know at slane@thehill.com or tweet me @SylvanLane. And if you like your newsletter, you can subscribe to it here: http://bit.ly/1NxxW2N.

Write us with tips, suggestions and news: slane@thehill.com, njagoda@thehill.com and nelis@thehill.com. Follow us on Twitter: @SylvanLane, @NJagoda and @NivElis.

ADVERTISEMENT

THE BIG DEAL— Unemployment rate exceeded 20 percent in three states last month: The jobless rate exceeded 20 percent in Hawaii, Michigan and Nevada last month when 43 states hit record-high unemployment because of the coronavirus pandemic, according to Labor Department figures released Friday.

  • Nevada had the highest unemployment rate in the country at 28.2 percent, almost double the national average of 14.7 percent. Michigan followed with 22.7 percent and Hawaii had 22.3 percent of its labor force looking for work.
  • Seven other states had jobless rates above the national average, which was just 3.5 percent as recently as February.

The report on state unemployment found that the effects of the coronavirus pandemic were not evenly distributed, even though all states were in worse shape than the previous month.

The Hill’s Niv Elis has more on the data here, including the unemployment rate in swing states that will decide the election.

 

LEADING THE DAY

Senate leaves for break without passing Paycheck Protection Program fix: The Senate left for a weeklong Memorial Day recess without passing bipartisan legislation to make fixes to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), the coronavirus relief program for small businesses. 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Senate GOP leadership on Thursday began to “hotline” the legislation, a procedural move that allows them to see if any senator would object to passing it. Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneOn The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under 0K Senate leaves for break without passing Paycheck Protection Program fix McConnell in talks with Gardner to allow Senate to take Memorial Day recess MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican, predicted it might pass on Thursday if no senator objected.
  • But the Senate adjourned on Thursday for the break without passing the legislation, which would extend the window for businesses to spend PPP money from eight weeks to 16 weeks. As the legislation stands currently, businesses have to spend the money within eight weeks to qualify for loan forgiveness. 

What comes next: Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioOn The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under 0K The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – Mnuchin: More COVID-19 congressional action ahead Senate leaves for break without passing Paycheck Protection Program fix MORE (R-Fla.), the chairman of the Small Business Committee, said that leadership was still trying to find out if any senator objected to passing the bill and left the door open to the Senate passing it during a pro forma session that is scheduled to continue next Tuesday.

“It’s going to pass. It’s just how long it takes to run the hotline and get all the offices to call back,” he said. Rubio added that because every office is called during a hotline, “It could take two hours or it could take two days, it just depends. It’s a very mysterious process.”

Bigger stimulus on the way: Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSenate Republicans call on DOJ to investigate Planned Parenthood loans On The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under 0K The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden seeks to tamp down controversy over remarks about black support MORE (R-Ky.) signaled Thursday that the Senate GOP’s decision to pause before starting work on another coronavirus relief bill could be nearing an end.

“I think there’s a high likelihood that we’ll do another rescue package. … We’re not quite ready to intelligently lay down the next step, but it’s not too far off,” McConnell said during an interview with Fox News. 

“We need to work smart here, help the people who are desperately in need, try to save as many jobs as possible and begin to open up the states, which are decisions by the governors,” McConnell added. 

  • McConnell’s remarks come amid growing calls from within his caucus for the Senate to pass another coronavirus bill, which would be the fifth piece of legislation passed by Congress to address the fallout from the pandemic, by the end of the June. 
  • McConnell said during the Fox News interview that the next bill will not resemble a roughly $3 trillion bill that passed the House along party lines last week, and vowed that the White House and Senate Republicans will be on the same page. 

The Hill’s Jordain Carney has more here

Related: Mnuchin says Congress must act to make key PPP change

 

Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under $400,000: Former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenOn The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under 0K Trump to attend SpaceX launch in Florida Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers demand answers on Chinese COVID hacks | Biden re-ups criticism of Amazon | House Dem bill seeks to limit microtargeting MORE on Friday said that he would not increase taxes on those making less than $400,000 annually.

“Nobody making under 400,000 bucks would have their taxes raised. Period. Bingo,” the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee said in an interview with CNBC.

Biden has floated a number of tax proposals during his campaign, largely targeted at raising taxes on wealthy individuals and businesses. These include:

  • Rolling back President TrumpDonald John TrumpREAD: The Hill’s interview with Anthony Fauci Trump’s routing number revealed as press secretary announces he’s donating quarterly salary to HHS: report Former White House aide won M contract to supply masks amid pandemic MORE‘s 2017 tax cuts for people with income over $400,000,
  • Capping the value of itemized deductions for people in tax brackets above 28 percent
  • Taxing capital gains at the same rate as ordinary income for those making more than $1 million
  • Raising the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent, and 
  • Imposing a 15 percent minimum tax on companies’ income as reported on financial statements.

Why it matters: Biden isn’t the first presidential candidate to pledge not to raise taxes on people who make under a certain amount. Former President Obama said during his 2008 campaign that he wouldn’t raise taxes on people who make under $250,000. But this type of pledge could make it more difficult to raise some of the revenue needed to pay for a number of Democratic policy objectives.

More from Biden’s CNBC interview: Biden hit President Trump’s efforts to rescue the economy during the coronavirus pandemic, saying the focus has been on helping big corporations instead of small businesses.

 

GOOD TO KNOW

  • A group of senators on Friday rolled out a bipartisan bill to prevent Americans’ coronavirus relief payments from being garnished by private debt collectors.
  • Increased tensions between President Trump and China over the coronavirus pandemic are threatening to complicate a recovery from the worst global economic downturn in decades. 
  • The nation’s leading infectious disease expert, Anthony FauciAnthony FauciREAD: The Hill’s interview with Anthony Fauci On The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under 0K Overnight Health Care: Fauci on why a vaccine by end of year is ‘aspirational’ | Trump demands governors allow churches to open | Birx says DC metro area has highest positivity rate MORE, said Friday that he is “totally in favor” of reopening the country if it is done appropriately and cautiously.

Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey

Two men accused of aiding ex-Nissan chairman's escape arrested in Massachusetts

Two men who are accused by Japanese authorities of aiding former Nissan Chairman Carlos Ghosn in his escape from Japan were arrested in Massachusetts on Wednesday, and are set to appear by video in court this afternoon.

Bloomberg reported that Michael Taylor and son Peter Maxwell Taylor are accused of helping Ghosn escape Japan via plane ahead of Ghosn’s trial for allegedly under-reporting his income and misuse of company funds. Ghosn has denied the charges and alleged that he will not get a fair trial in Japan, and late last year fled the country for Lebanon, where he is a citizen.

At least one of the Taylors, Peter, planned to fly Wednesday to Beirut, where Ghosn is currently living, prosecutors said.

“Peter Taylor is not just capable of fleeing while on bond — he is an expert in the subject,” read a U.S. court filing obtained by Bloomberg. “The plot to spirit Ghosn out of Japan was one of the most brazen and well-orchestrated escape acts in recent history, involving a dizzying array of hotel meetups, bullet train travel, fake personas, and the chartering of a private jet.”

Prosecutors are reportedly asking that the Taylors be held without bail ahead of their possible extradition to Japan.

Ghosn was fired by Nissan in 2018 after it said an internal investigation corroborated the claims made against him by Japanese prosecutors.

Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey

Trump to attend SpaceX launch in Florida

President TrumpDonald John TrumpREAD: The Hill’s interview with Anthony Fauci Trump’s routing number revealed as press secretary announces he’s donating quarterly salary to HHS: report Former White House aide won M contract to supply masks amid pandemic MORE will attend a major SpaceX launch at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida next Wednesday, according to a White House official.

NASA astronauts are scheduled to fly on SpaceX’s Crew Dragon spacecraft on May 27, lifting off from the Kennedy Space Center complex at Cape Canaveral. It will be the first time that NASA has launched astronauts from the United States to the International Space Station since 2011.

The flight will mark the last flight test for the Crew Dragon spacecraft before it enters regular service. The capsule will blast off with a Falcon 9 rocket.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump acknowledged Thursday that he was considering attending the launch in Florida. The trip will be Trump’s fourth to a battleground state in the same number of weeks and will mark his first trip not related to the federal response to the novel coronavirus.

Trump has made space operations a priority during his administration, touting the establishment of the U.S. Space Force — the sixth branch of the U.S. military — in a defense policy bill negotiated and signed in December.

Trump’s three prior trips outside Washington in recent weeks include a visit Thursday to a Ford Motor Company plant in Michigan producing ventilators and other protective equipment to help front-line health care workers combat the pandemic. He has made similar trips to Pennsylvania and Arizona.

Florida represents a key battleground state for the president as he seeks reelection; Trump won the state narrowly in 2016. The RealClearPolitics polling index shows former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenOn The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under 0K Trump to attend SpaceX launch in Florida Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers demand answers on Chinese COVID hacks | Biden re-ups criticism of Amazon | House Dem bill seeks to limit microtargeting MORE, the presumptive Democratic nominee, with a slight edge over the president in the Sunshine State.

Senate Republicans call on DOJ to investigate Planned Parenthood loans

Senate Republicans are calling on the Justice Department to investigate Planned Parenthood centers over loans they received under the coronavirus stimulus package as the group faces increasing scrutiny from the GOP.

Twenty-seven senators led by Sen. Tom CottonThomas (Tom) Bryant CottonSenate Republicans call on DOJ to investigate Planned Parenthood loans Overnight Defense: Trump to withdraw US from Open Skies Treaty | Pentagon drops ban on recruits who had virus | FBI says Corpus Christi shooting terror-related Former CIA chief: Trump withdrawal from Open Skies Treaty ‘is insane’ MORE (R-Ark.) and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSenate Republicans call on DOJ to investigate Planned Parenthood loans On The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under 0K The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden seeks to tamp down controversy over remarks about black support MORE (R-Ky.) alleged in a letter to Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrSenate Republicans call on DOJ to investigate Planned Parenthood loans FBI director Wray orders internal review of Flynn case Grenell says intelligence community working to declassify Flynn-Kislyak transcripts MORE on Thursday that the $80 million in loans Planned Parenthood affiliates received under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) should not have gone to the sites.

“We write to urge you to investigate the activities of dozens of Planned Parenthood affiliates that reportedly applied for and received approximately $80 million in loans from the Paycheck Protection Program, despite actual knowledge that they were ineligible for such loans,” they wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was not designed to give government funds to politicized, partisan abortion providers like Planned Parenthood,” the senators added. “The funds in the program are not unlimited and were depleted once already because of high demand.”

The pressure from the 27 senators compounds on scrutiny over Planned Parenthood, which had already been urged by the Small Business Association (SBA) to return the funds its affiliates received.

The SBA sent letters to a number of the affiliates this week saying they were ineligible for the funds due to the PPP’s size standards and that the money should be returned.

The loans from the PPP, which was created under the $2.2 trillion CARES Act that was signed into law in March, are intended for businesses and nonprofits with no more than 500 employees, though the legislation allows some flexibility for larger firms to receive funds. The SBA also has implemented restrictions on how affiliates from one organization can qualify.

The argument from the senators and the SBA is that Planned Parenthood’s affiliates are subject to enough discretion from the larger organization that they should be deemed ineligible for the loans.

“The implementing interim final rule, issued by the SBA on April 15, 2020, explicitly stated that the SBA’s affiliation rules apply to the new Paycheck Protection Program, which excludes organizations like Planned Parenthood that employ its type of governance and affiliation structure and exceed the cap on total employees,” the senators wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

Planned Parenthood has pushed back against the arguments from the GOP, accusing them of launching a “clear political attack on Planned Parenthood health centers and access to reproductive health care.” 

“It has nothing to do with Planned Parenthood health care organizations’ eligibility for COVID-19 relief efforts, and everything to do with the Trump administration using a public health crisis to advance a political agenda and distract from their own failures in protecting the American public from the spread of COVID-19,” Jacqueline Ayers, Planned Parenthood Federation of America’s vice president of government relations and public policy, said in a statement.

“It is also just the latest salvo in the Trump administration’s long history of targeting Planned Parenthood, and trying to severely limit access to sexual and reproductive health care,” she added.

The GOP’s complaints over the loans received by the Planned Parenthood affiliates adds a new layer of scrutiny over the government assistance program, which had already come under fire after it was revealed that large companies like Shake Shack and the Los Angeles Lakers received aid. Still, the government is expected to negotiate some extension for the PPP to give small businesses more time to spend funds. 

“I’m not sure it’s that long but I’ve spoken with the SBA committee and there is bipartisan support so we’re working on that,” Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinSenate Republicans call on DOJ to investigate Planned Parenthood loans The Hill’s Coronavirus Report: Surgeon General stresses need to invest much more in public health infrastructure, during and after COVID-19; Fauci hopeful vaccine could be deployed in December Republicans push for help for renewable energy, fossil fuel industries MORE said this week.

Overnight Defense: Trump to withdraw US from Open Skies Treaty | Pentagon drops ban on recruits who had virus | FBI says Corpus Christi shooting terror-related

Happy Thursday and welcome to Overnight Defense. I’m Ellen Mitchell, and here’s your nightly guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. CLICK HERE to subscribe to the newsletter.

THE TOPLINE: President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate panel approves Trump nominee under investigation Melania Trump thanks students in video message during CNN town hall Fauci says media will be ‘seeing more’ of him, coronavirus task force after press hiatus MORE on Thursday caused an uproar in Washington with his newly revealed plans to withdraw from another major arms control agreement, the Open Skies Treaty, citing Russia’s violations of the pact.

The Open Skies Treaty allows the pact’s 35 signatories, including the United States and Russia, to fly unarmed observation flights over each other with the intention of providing transparency about military activities to avoid miscalculations that could lead to war.

Trump told reporters at the White House that Washington and Moscow could reach a new agreement following the U.S. withdrawal.

“I think we have a very good relationship with Russia, but Russia didn’t adhere to the treaty,” Trump told reporters before departing for a trip to Michigan. “So, until they adhere, we will pull out.”

“But there’s a very good chance we’ll make a new agreement or do something to put that agreement back together,” the president continued. “I think what’s going to happen is, we’re going to pull out and they’re going to come back and want to make a deal. We’ve had a very good relationship, lately, with Russia.”

Intent to withdraw coming Friday: Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the United States will formally submit its notice of intent to withdraw from the agreement on Friday.

“Effective six months from tomorrow, the United States will no longer be a party to the treaty,” Pompeo said in a statement. “We may, however, reconsider our withdrawal should Russia return to full compliance with the treaty.”

Why the US is leaving: The treaty, which went into force in 2002, has long been in the crosshairs of defense hawks, who argue Russian violations give Moscow an unfair advantage over Washington.

“President Trump has made clear that the United States will not remain a party to international agreements that are being violated by the other parties and are no longer in America’s interests,” national security adviser Robert O’Brien said in a statement later Thursday that did not explicitly address the president’s plans.

O’Brien referenced the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Trump has withdrawn the United States from both pacts.

Russia in the past has restricted flights over Kaliningrad and areas near its border with the Georgian regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

Because of those restrictions, an April report from the State Department said “the United States continued to assess that Russia was in violation of the Treaty on Open Skies” in 2019, a determination first made in 2017.

Further argumentsIn addition to accusing Russia of “flagrantly and continuously” violating the agreement with flight restrictions, Pompeo on Thursday accused Moscow of using imagery from the flights to target critical infrastructure in the U.S. and Europe. That would not violate the accord, but Pompeo argued it “fatally undermined the very intent of the treaty as a confidence- and trust-building measure.”

Pressed on call with reporters for an example of Russia using imagery like that, Chris Ford, assistant secretary of State for international security and nonproliferation, said he was “not at liberty to go into some of the details of why we think that this is a concern.”

GOP lawmaker response: Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a vocal critic of the treaty, has urged Trump to withdraw from the pact and divert funds spent on the treaty to other military projects over Russia’s abuse of the pact. Cotton lauded Trump’s decision in a statement Thursday in response to reports disclosing the plans.

“The Open Skies Treaty started life as a good-faith agreement between major powers and died an asset of Russian intelligence. For Mr. Putin, the treaty was just another scheme to snatch a military and surveillance advantage over the U.S. and NATO,” Cotton said. 

A ‘dangerous and misguided decision’Meanwhile, Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), another Armed Services member, criticized the move as a “dangerous and misguided decision” that “cripples our ability to conduct aerial surveillance of Russia, while allowing Russian reconnaissance flights over U.S. bases in Europe to continue.”

Supporters of the treaty argue it is an invaluable tool for the United States to support its allies, saying U.S. partners without sophisticated spy satellites benefit from the unclassified imagery.

Rumors prompted pushback: Trump’s impending move to withdraw from the treaty has been rumored for months. In October, a quartet of top Democrats in Congress wrote a letter to Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Pompeo urging against withdrawal.

Last month, the same group of lawmakers released a statement warning Trump could use the cover of the coronavirus pandemic to withdraw from the accord with little attention, saying such a move “in the midst of a global health crisis is not only shortsighted, but also unconscionable.”

“This effort appears intended to limit appropriate congressional consultation on, and scrutiny of, the decision,” House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith (D-Wash.), House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), Senate Armed Services Committee ranking member Jack Reed (D-R.I.) and Senate Foreign Relations Committee ranking member Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) said in an April statement.

Another treaty at risk: The decision by Trump to withdraw from the treaty follows last year’s withdrawal from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty, a decades-old Cold War arms control pact with Russia, over Moscow’s violations.

The latest move is likely to raise questions about Trump’s plans for New START, the last remaining arms control pact with Russia that is up for renewal in February.

Intel figure blasts move to withdraw: A former head of the CIA on Thursday responded to Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Open Skies Treaty, calling the move “insane.”

Gen. Michael Hayden, who served as director of the CIA mostly under President George W. Bush between 2006 and 2009, replied on Twitter to a member of George Conway’s Lincoln Project in reaction to the news of the withdrawal.

“This is insane,” he said. “I was the director of CIA.”

 

PENTAGON RESCINDS BAN ON RECRUITS PREVIOUSLY HOSPITALIZED WITH COVID-19: The Defense Department has rescinded a policy that banned recruits from enlisting in the military if they have been hospitalized for coronavirus, the Pentagon’s head of manpower said Thursday.

The original policy, released earlier this month, began as a total ban on recruits who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 in the past. That was then changed to potentially barring the enlistee if they had been hospitalized due to the illness.

But the “interim guidance” has now been pulled and the department has returned to its previous process and guidelines for ushering recruits into the military, Matthew Donovan, the under secretary of Defense for personnel and readiness, told reporters at the Pentagon.

“At the same time, we’re having our health professionals and our doctors and researchers take a look at that, come up with any recommendations that they’ll provide to me and [Defense Secretary Mark Esper]. And I think they’re almost done with that now,” he said.

Waiver needed? It depends: Asked if a recruit would need a waiver to join if they had contracted the illness and recovered, Donovan said the military will review such instances on a case-by-case basis.

“Any infectious disease, we want to make sure they’re not infectious at the time. … There’s a lot of unknowns about this virus right now. Are there any long-term, lasting effects? That’s what our health care professionals are looking at right now, and they’ll come up with that recommendation on if there’s any changes required to the accession standard,” he said.

Donovan added that he had explained the policy earlier on Thursday morning to Senate Armed Services Committee members worried about the ban and its effects on recruiting.

The background: The Pentagon raced over the past several months to set up new protocols to prevent any recruit from bringing coronavirus into the military as the pandemic overtook the country.

Those new practices include an initial screening in the recruit’s home state, a screening at the military entrance processing centers and then again once they are moved to initial training facilities, with a quarantine before training begins. 

Doctors, scientists and researchers are still not sure whether the new illness has any short- or long-term effects, including possible damage to the lungs or susceptibility to contracting the virus at another point in time. 

 

CORPUS CHRISTI SHOOTING TERROR-RELATED, FBI SAYS: The shooting at the Naval Air Station Corpus Christi in Texas on Thursday is terrorism related, the FBI said. 

The shooter, who has not been identified, is dead, but a second person of interest may be at large in the community, according to the FBI. 

“We have determined that the incident this morning at the Naval Air Station Corpus Christi is terrorism related. We are working diligently with our state, local and federal partners with this investigation, which is fluid and evolving,” said Leah Greeves, FBI supervisor senior resident agent in Corpus Christi.

During a news conference, Greeves encouraged the public “to remain calm.” 

The shooting: The naval air station at Corpus Christi, Texas, was put on lockdown after a shooter opened fire on the base Thursday morning.

The station posted on Facebook that a shooter was active on the base “in the vicinity of the North Gate” and that naval security forces responded about 6:15 a.m. local time.

The shooter was later neutralized and the lockdown was lifted, according to several updates. 

One security force member, a female sailor, was injured and taken to a local hospital, Steve Strickland, a spokesman with Navy Region Southeast, told Stars and Stripes. She is in good condition and expected to be released Thursday.

 

ON TAP FOR TOMORROW

The Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies Nuclear Deterrence Forum will host a webcast on the implications of Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinOvernight Defense: Trump to withdraw US from Open Skies Treaty | Pentagon drops ban on recruits who had virus | FBI says Corpus Christi shooting terror-related Trump: China is ‘desperate’ for Biden to win ‘Never Trump’ Republicans: Fringe, or force to be reckoned with? MORE’s “escalate to win policy,” with Mark Schneider, senior analyst with the National Institute for Public Policy; Stephen Blank, senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute; and retired Maj. Gen. Larry Stutzriem at 10 a.m.

 

ICYMI

– The Hill: Senate confirms Trump’s Navy secretary pick

– The Hill: Navy’s oldest operational warship breaks its days-at-sea record

– The Hill: Democrats press Pompeo for details on IG firing, ‘Madison Dinners’

– The Hill: Senate confirms Ratcliffe to be Trump’s spy chief

– The Hill: Trump administration approves sale of torpedoes to Taiwan amid tensions with China

– The Hill: USS Theodore Roosevelt back at sea after 2 months sidelined by coronavirus

– Time: ‘We Do This for the Living.’ Inside New York’s Citywide Effort to Bury its Dead

– Associated Press: US envoy working to resuscitate flagging Afghan peace deal

Click Here: camiseta rosario central

States, companies set up their own COVID-19 legal shields

States and some companies aren’t waiting for Congress and the White House to work out a possible liability shield and are instead taking steps to insulate businesses on their own from lawsuits in the coronavirus era.

Many states have granted some form of liability immunity to health care workers and facilities. Utah and North Carolina have gone the farthest, passing laws that offer the strongest immunities yet for a range of industries as stay-at-home orders and business closures are eased.

In Utah, Gov. Gary Herbert (R) signed legislation earlier this month that makes all businesses and individuals immune from litigation based on others’ exposure to coronavirus on their property, with exceptions for things like willful misconduct. Oklahoma lawmakers have sent similar legislation to its governor.

ADVERTISEMENT

North Carolina’s law is narrower than Utah’s and applies to “essential businesses” as defined in the state’s emergency declaration, but still offers more protection than other states.

At least six states — Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana, Ohio, South Carolina, and Wyoming — have introduced legislation that would also shield more than just health care workers and facilities, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

Experts note that even if U.S. lawmakers reach a deal on a liability shield, states may be in a stronger position than Congress to adjust state tort laws, which provide remedies for civil wrongs and injuries.

“The practical realities of trying to reopen the economy, combined with the constitutional limitations of federalism, make it more likely than not we will have a patchwork of state-based immunity shields rather than a nationwide set up,” said legal analyst Brad Moss.

And with all 50 states now open to some degree, the possibility of lawsuits may be increasing.

One U.S. law firm suggested coronavirus litigation could be “the new asbestos,” referring to a wave of personal injury litigation in the 1970s and 80s related to the carcinogenic material that was once commonly used in building construction.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If you just let it all go now, it would be a disaster,” said David Rivkin, a partner at Baker Hostetler, who supports Congress granting businesses temporary immunity. “It would be a tsunami of lawsuits. Hundreds have already been filed.”

To date, nearly 1,300 covid-related lawsuits of all varieties have been filed, according to the law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth. Additionally, more than 14,000 pandemic-era complaints and referrals have been filed nationwide to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the federal agency charged with overseeing workplace safety.

Advocates for liability laws argue that the lawsuits could force a number of businesses to close.

“As states look to reignite their economies, it’s possible that the risk of being sued by a customer or employee who is exposed to COVID-19 will dissuade some businesses from reopening,” said Josh Cunningham, an employment and labor expert at NCSL.

Congress in an earlier stimulus bill granted legal immunity to makers of protective equipment amid critical shortfalls. But Democrats, labor unions and trial attorneys have voiced fierce opposition to expanding liability protections to a broader swathe of commercial enterprises, saying they could discourage businesses from taking necessary precautions.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerSchumer: Trump fires watchdogs ‘when he hears the truth’ McConnell in talks with Gardner to allow Senate to take Memorial Day recess The Hill’s Campaign Report: Democrats slam Trump for threatening to hold Michigan funds MORE (D-N.Y.) last week accused Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellMcConnell: Next coronavirus bill ‘not too far off’ McConnell gives two vulnerable senators a boost with vote on outdoor recreation bill On The Money: Mnuchin sees ‘strong likelihood’ of needing another COVID-19 relief bill | 2.4 million more Americans file new jobless claims | Top bank regulator abruptly announces resignation MORE (R-Kent.) of focusing on the wrong priorities in insisting on a liability shield.

“We have people starving, we have people being kicked out of their homes, and he’s worried about a big businessman being sued because he let one of his workers be susceptible to COVID?” Schumer said. “Come on, stop the ideological issues.”

McConnell fired back days later and said legal protections for businesses were non-negotiable.

“On legal liability reform, the work lies ahead of us,” McConnell said May 14 in a Senate floor speech. “As my Republican colleagues and I have made clear, strong legal protections will be a hard-red line in any future legislation.”

Critics of measures like Utah’s, including that state’s House Minority Leader Brian King (D), say such measures risk making businesses less safe for workers and the public.

“It sends precisely the wrong message to businesses and to landlords and to people out there who should be concerned that they do everything they can that’s reasonable to protect their customers and protect their employees,” King told The Salt Lake Tribune after the law passed.

It’s not just states that are taking action in the face of congressional gridlock. 

The Disney corporation made headlines this week when it issued a new disclaimer that seeks to shift the risk of coronavirus exposure to potential customers.

By visiting its Walt Disney World Resort, the company warned on its website, patrons are assuming the “inherent risk of exposure to COVID-19,” which it describes as “an extremely contagious disease that can lead to severe illness and death.”

Such language reflects a common strategy that corporations employ to preemptively defend against lawsuits, telling customers in effect that they “assume the risk” if things go awry in the course of engaging in business with the company. 

“Even if you don’t physically sign anything, you sometimes agree to a waiver simply by your actions,” legal analyst Elie Honig wrote for CNN.

“Expect businesses across the country to follow Disney’s effort to insulate itself from potential Covid-19 liability,” he added. “Such waivers are likely here to stay.”

 

Click Here: camiseta rosario central

10 things to know today about coronavirus

Welcome to the Hill’s daily roundup of coronavirus news.

There are over 1.5 million cases of coronavirus in the United States, and nearly 94,000 deaths, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. 

President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate panel approves Trump nominee under investigation Melania Trump thanks students in video message during CNN town hall Fauci says media will be ‘seeing more’ of him, coronavirus task force after press hiatus MORE headed to a Michigan Ford factory making ventilators on Thursday where he did not wear a mask and declared the United States would not shut down if there is a second wave of the virus in the country. 

ADVERTISEMENT

At the same time, the virus is continuing to surge in the U.S.’s new epicenter — rural counties and small towns across the South and Midwest, as well as in cities that avoided the worst of the initial wave of infections.

Here’s what to know today: 

In the Trump administration

  • President Trump said he would not recommend closing the country in a second wave of coronavirus. “Whether it’s an ember or a flame, we’re going to put it out. But we’re not closing our country,” he said. Morgan Chalfant reports. 

  • Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said there is a “strong likelihood” that another coronavirus relief bill will be needed, as GOP lawmakers debate the scope of relief required and push back on House Democrats’ expansive proposal. Naomi Jagoda reports.

  • The U.S. is awarding over $1 billion for a clinical trial and production of a potential coronavirus vaccine from AstraZeneca and Oxford University in the United States. John Bowden reports.

    ADVERTISEMENT

  • Surgeon General Jerome Adams said Thursday that the U.S. is now better prepared to reopen and has more tools to fight the virus than it did a few weeks ago, though he acknowledged reopening is not “without risk.” Peter Sullivan reports. 

  • President Trump did not wear a mask during a tour of a Ford factory in Michigan where ventilators are being produced despite the company’s policy requiring everyone to wear personal protective equipment. Brett Samuels reports. 

In the states

Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

  • Flareups in Southern and Midwestern states are becoming new epicenters of the outbreak, and almost 80 percent of Americans now live in counties where the virus is spreading widely, according to a new analysis. Reid Wilson reports.

  • Washington, D.C., could lift its stay-at-home order and begin a phased reopening of certain businesses as soon as May 29, Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) announced. Nathaniel Weixel reports.

  • See where your state ranks on the list of most to least reopened. Alicia Cohn and Justine Coleman report. 

 

Other news

  • A Gallup poll found that 65 percent of people said they have avoided public places in the past seven days, down from 71 percent last week, as more people venture out. Justine Coleman reports.

  • The U.S. could have avoided nearly 36,000 deaths from coronavirus through early May if stay-at-home orders and other social distancing restrictions were implemented just one week earlier, a new study from Columbia University researchers shows. Justin Wise reports.