"Le sexe dans tous ses états", la nouvelle émission de TF1

TF1 lance ce soir sa nouvelle émission présentée par Véronique Mounier, “Le sexe dans tous ses états“. La chaîne proposera une série d’enquêtes sur les comportements amoureux des plus jeunes, mais aussi sur les nouvelles pratiques sexuelles des Français.

 L’ex-entremetteuse de l’“Amour est dans le pré“, Véronique Mounier, s’installera aux commandes de la nouvelle émission de TF1, “Le sexe dans tous ses états“, avec l’ambition d’informer, de rassurer et de répondre aux questions que chacun peut se poser en matière de sexualité. A l’occasion de cette première diffusion, l’animatrice abordera sans tabou la découverte de la sexualité des ados, la pornographie, les violences sexuelles perpétrées par des mineurs ou encore les grossesses précoces. Une sexologue, Laura Beltran, ira directement à la rencontre des jeunes afin de répondre à leurs interrogations. Découvrez sur la vidéo ci-dessous la présentation de cette première émission :

Le sexe dans tous ses états
envoyé par

TELEOBS. –

Regardez les dernières vidéos d’actu.
 Dans une interview sur TF1.fr (

pour y accéder, cliquez ici), Véronique Mounier confie que le ton de l’émission sera “assez sérieux“. “J’aimerais vraiment que l’émission suscite le dialogue entre parents et adolescents, qu’ils la regardent ensemble pour pouvoir en parler et en débattre“. Quant à la forme, “sans être alarmiste, l’émission aborde de véritables questions de fond avec un traitement très journalistique. A aucun moment je n’ai eu l’impression d’être dans le voyeurisme ou le sulfureux“ poursuit-elle. “Le sexe dans tous ses états“ sera tout de même diffusé en deuxième partie de soirée.
 
 En tout cas, la sexualité est une thématique qui rassemble. Sur TF1 hier soir, 9,4 millions de téléspectateurs ont été séduit par le téléfilm “Clem“, narrant la grossesse d’une ado de 16 ans. Un engouement de bonne augure pour la première chaîne à la veille de la diffusion de sa nouvelle émission consacrée aux nouveaux comportements sexuels.
 Emmanuelle Vieillard
 
 Source : TF1.fr, TéléObs via Dailymotion, février 2010Click Here: camiseta river plate

Les compléments alimentaires pas toujours justifiés chez les enfants

Les compléments alimentaires ont le vent en poupe, même chez nos têtes blondes. Selon l’étude INCA 2, 12 % des enfants entre 3  et 17 ans en ont consommé au moins une fois au cours des 12 derniers mois. S’ils s’avèrent utiles dans des situations particulières, dans de nombreux cas, leur indication est soit discutable, soit injustifiée.

La place des compléments alimentaires (CA) chez les enfants est un sujet sur lequel peu de données sont disponibles, du moins en France. Néanmoins, la consommation de compléments à base de vitamines et minéraux chez les enfants a été abordée dans le cadre de l’étude INCA 2 (Etude individuelle nationale des comportements alimentaires) (1). Pour ce faire, 1455 enfants ont dû remplir (ou faire remplir par leurs parents) un carnet de consommation sur 7 jours et un questionnaire sur leurs habitudes de consommation sur 12 mois.Selon les données obtenues, environ 183 enfants avaient consommé, au moins une fois dans l’année des compléments alimentaires, soit plus de 11 au total. Aucune différence n’a été observée selon le sexe de l’enfant, alors que chez l’adulte, on remarque une tendance plus prononcée à la consommation des CA chez les femmes par rapport aux hommes.L’un des points les plus remarquables de l’étude montre que dans la plupart des cas, les enfants consommateurs de CA sont issus de familles dont le chef de famille a un niveau d’étude important, occupant généralement un poste de cadre ou ayant une profession libérale.
Le deuxième point est que seulement 5 % des enfants consommateurs de CA sont en surpoids, alors que ce chiffre est de 15 % chez les non-consommateurs. Il n’existe probablement pas de lien de cause à effet entre la consommation de CA et le surpoids (alors qu’il en existe entre la situation socio-démographique et le surpoids).
Par ailleurs, les apports en vitamines uniquement via l’alimentation des enfants consommateurs de CA est supérieur aux autres.Dans 70 % des cas, la consommation de CA est médicalisée, c’est-à-dire qu’elle fait suite soit à une prescription médicale, soit aux conseils d’un professionnel de santé. En fait, la prescription de CA trouve une justification médicale dans trois cas bien précis (chez les enfants ne souffrant pas d’une pathologie particulière) : la carence en vitamine D, en fer ou en calcium pour certaines classes d’âge uniquement – En fait, la supplémentation en

vitamine D est obligatoire pour les nourrissons chez qui on observe carence et déficience de cette vitamine. Ainsi, selon les recommandations officielles, les nourrissons doivent avoir une supplémentation en vitamine D sur l’année entière (100 000  I/jour), de 2 à 5 ans en cure, à la fin de l’hiver (100 000 UI/jour), tout comme ceux de 10 à 17 ans (mais la dose est moins élevée). La supplémentation peut également se justifier chez les enfants et adolescents qui ne sont pas suffisament exposés au soleil (par exemple, 25 % des enfants normands sont carencés en vitamine D car cette région est peu ensoleillée, notamment l’hiver).- Une large population d’adolescents et surtout d’adolescentes sont en situation de carence en calcium. Or, des apports insuffisants à cette période de la vie peuvent les exposer plus tard (notamment pour les femmes) à des risques accrus

d’ostéoporose. Ici, il est tout à fait possible de corriger les carences en enrichissant l’alimentation avec des produits laitiers, notamment le

lait (le calcium qui y est contenu est mieux absorbé que celui provenant d’autres sources). La prise de CA au calcium ne sera envisagée que si et seulement si, les adolescents refusent de consommer des produits laitiers.- Quant aux carences martiales (en

fer) s’observent surtout chez les nourrissons et les adolescentes (à cause des règles notamment). Chez les nourrissons, cela peut s’expliquer, entre autres, par une introduction trop rapide du lait de vache au lieu des laits infantiles). 71 % des jeunes filles de 15 à 19 ans sont carencées. Là encore, les carences seront traitées en équilibrant l’alimentation pour y introduire le maximum d’aliments riches en fer. La supplémentation n’est indiquée qu’en cas d’anémie avérée en raison des risques et inconvénients des CA riches en fer (diarrhées, douleurs abdominales, etc.).Enfin, les experts soulignent le fait que les probiotiques, cocktails de vitamines et autres CA aux

Oméga 3 n’ont pas démontré leur intérêt scientifique et qu’ils n’ont donc aucune indication justifiée actuellement. Yamina Saïdj Source : Session d’actualité en nutrition : Place des compléments alimentaires chez les enfants. Pr Ambroise Martin, M. Lionel Lafay, Pr jean-Philippe Girardet, 18 mars 2010. Salon du Medec. (1) Menée entre fin 2005 et avril 2007, la deuxième étude Individuelle Nationale des Consommations Alimentaires (INCA 2) regroupe les données de consommations alimentaires sur 7 jours de plus de 4000 participants, dont 1455 enfants, habitant en France métropolitaine.

Lush part en tournée !

En partenariat avec Céline Naissant, auteure de “Mes secrets de beauté au naturel“, Lush vous propose un événement plein de gourmandises. Céline Naissant fait la tournée des boutiques parisiennes de la marque pour des séances de dédicace durant lesquelles elle vous fera partager ses secrets de beauté uniques.

La marque de cosmétiques frais faits main, Lush, vous invite à venir faire le plein de cadeaux dans ses boutiques parisiennes. Si vous vous êtes offert le bouquin “Mes secrets de beauté au naturel“ de Céline Naissant, qui regorge de recettes de beauté green, venez le faire dédicacer les 6, 20 et 27 mai prochains dans les boutiques parisiennes Lush*.Vous vous verrez remettre un sac plein de goodies et pourrez participer à la tombola pour tenter de remporter 1 caverne d’A-Lush Baba (valeur 199 €) ; 1 livre dédicacé de Céline Naissant ; 1 tableau de Kanako (illustratrice du livre). Et plein d’autres surprises que chaque équipe en boutique vous réserve…

Alors pour faire le plein de beauté au naturel en mai, filez chez Lush !

* Le 6 mai à Lush St Antoine (Paris 12ème); le 20 mai à Lush Buci (Paris 6ème); le 27 mai à Lush Leclerc (Paris 14ème)Juliette RobinSource : Communiqué Lush – avril 2010Click Here: cheap all stars rugby jersey

Vaccin contre la grippe A et narcolepsie : l'agence européenne du médicament ouvre une enquête

L’Agence européenne du médicament (EMA) a annoncé aujourd’hui l’ouverture d’une enquête pour déterminer l’existence d’un lien entre le vaccin contre la grippe A (H1N1) Pandemrix et les cas de narcolepsie récemment observés en Europe. Ce sera le Comité des médicaments à usage humain de l’EMA qui sera chargé d’examiner toutes les données disponibles pour réunir les preuves d’une éventuelle “association causale“. Cette enquête intervient après le signalement de plusieurs cas de narcolepsie en Europe chez des patients ayant été vaccinés contre la grippe A.

L’Agence suédoise des produits médicaux a ouvert une enquête, le 18 août dernier, sur d’éventuels effets indésirables provoqués par Pandemrix. Cette décision a été prise suite à la remise de nombreux rapports par des professionnels de santé sur des symptômes compatibles avec la narcolepsie signalés sur des adolescents âgés de 12 à 16 ans, un à deux mois après leur vaccination contre la grippe A. La narcolepsie est une affection neurologique se traduisant par une somnolence diurne et une faiblesse musculaire.L’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Afssaps) a, quant à elle, signalé, le 26 août dernier, six cas de narcolepsie cataplexie chez des Français vaccinés contre la grippe A (H1N1). Néanmoins, aucun lien n’a réellement été établi entre le vaccin et le déclenchement de la maladie.Le Comité des médicaments à usage humain de l’EMA évaluera ces cas ainsi que la balance des bénéfices-risques du vaccin Pandemrix. En cas d’existence d’effets indésirables, l’EMA prendra des mesures provisoires jusqu’à la remise des conclusions.De son côté, le ministère de la Santé et des Sports souhaite rappeler que la campagne de vaccination contre la grippe A (H1N1) a été accompagnée de la mise en oeuvre d’une “pharmacovigilance renforcée en complément du plan de gestion des risques européen“. La ministre de la Santé Roselyne Bachelot affirme également que ce dispositif de surveillance a été mené “dans la plus grande rigueur et en totale transparence“. Selon le communiqué du Ministère de la santé et des sports, sur les 5,7 millions de personnes qui ont été vaccinés, 4121 effets indésirables ont été signalés et 94 % d’entre eux ont été qualifiés de bénins selon la définition de l’AFSSAPS (courbatures ou fièvre, réactions au site d’injection, réactions allergiques). Plus de 30 millions de patients ont reçu le vaccin Pandemrix dans l’Union européenne. En France, le vaccin développé par le laboratoire GlaxoSmithKline a profité à plus de 4 millions de personnes, selon l’Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé. Luc BlanchotSources :Communiqué de l’EMEA – 27 août 2010

(accessible en ligne)Communiqué du ministère de la santé et des sports du 27 mai 2010Photo :Matilde Campodonico/AP/SIPAClick Here: Cheap FIJI Rugby Jersey

Pipololook : Drew Barrymore, éclatante en Givenchy

A l’occasion de la 63ème cérémonie des Emmy Awards, qui s’est tenue dimanche dernier à Los-Angeles, Drew Barrymore a fait une apparition plus que remarquée.Et pour cause, l’actrice, qui remettait un prix entourée des trois nouvelles drôles de dames, Minka Kelly, Rachel Taylor et Annie Ilonzeh, portait une superbe robe Givenchy Haute-Couture, dessinée par Riccardo Tisci. Issue de la collection Automne-Hiver 2011, cette robe du soir en tulle et organza ivoire allait à ravir à la belle égérie Lancôme. Un subtil jeu de transparence permettait d’apercevoir ses jambes. Verdict : un look romantique et élégant. Bien vu ! Source : Communiqué de presse Givenchy du 19 septembre 2011Sandra Rosinsky

Democratic senators demand answers on US involvement in foiled Venezuela plot

Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday called on Trump administration officials to share information about a foiled military operation against the ruling Venezuelan government that involved two American citizens.

Venezuelan authorities over the weekend released photos showing the arrest of two American citizens allegedly involved in an attempted coup against embattled Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro that was launched by military defectors.

One of the Americans, Jordan Goudreau, is a former U.S. Army Green Beret and founder of the private security firm Silvercorp USA.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a letter Thursday to Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoDemocratic senators demand answers on US involvement in foiled Venezuela plot Former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy says public health threat of loneliness compounded by COVID-19; Trump says task force will ‘evolve’ China’s regime won’t change, so the Chinese people must change it MORE, Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrBarr says it was ‘duty’ to drop Flynn case: ‘It upheld the rule of law’ Democrats renew calls for Barr to resign after DOJ drops Flynn case Pelosi slams move to drop Flynn case: ‘Barr’s politicization of justice knows no bounds’ MORE and acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell, the senators demanded information on whether the U.S. provided any assistance to the foiled attack.

“Either the U.S. government was unaware of these planned operations, or was aware and allowed them to proceed. Both possibilities are problematic,” Sens. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyDemocratic senators demand answers on US involvement in foiled Venezuela plot GOP chairman says nation needs ‘millions’ more tests to safely reopen Pompeo renews calls for China to provide US access to Wuhan labs MORE (D-Conn.), Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael KaineOVENIGHT DEFENSE: Navy secretary nominee: Service in ‘rough waters’ after ‘failure of leadership’| Senate fails to override Trump’s Iran war powers veto| Top Armed Services Republican expects to address Pentagon border wall funds in defense policy bill Democratic senators demand answers on US involvement in foiled Venezuela plot Senate fails to override Trump’s Iran war powers veto MORE (D-Va.) and Tom UdallThomas (Tom) Stewart UdallDemocratic senators demand answers on US involvement in foiled Venezuela plot OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Oil prices jump amid partial reopenings | Bill aims to block fossil fuel firms from coronavirus aid | Tribes to receive some coronavirus aid after court battle Tribes begin to receive partial coronavirus stimulus funding after court battle MORE (D-N.M.) wrote.

They demanded information on American policy toward Venezuela, saying support of a military operation is in violation of the VERDAD Act, signed into law in December, that states U.S. policy is to engage diplomatically to advance a negotiated solution to Venezuela’s political, economic and humanitarian crisis.

“Armed raids, even if they are carried out by independent actors, run counter to that policy,” the senators wrote. “Moreover, such incursions harm the prospects for a peaceful democratic transition in Venezuela by insinuating that an armed intervention is a viable option to resolve the crisis, potentially undermining the willingness of hardline opposition actors to negotiate, while simultaneously allowing Maduro to rally support to his side, strengthening his hand.”

Pompeo has echoed statements by President TrumpDonald John TrumpGuidelines drafted by CDC were rejected by Trump administration citing religious freedom, economic concerns: report Tara Reade represented by well-known lawyer, Trump campaign donor Barr says it was ‘duty’ to drop Flynn case: ‘It upheld the rule of law’ MORE and senior administration officials that the U.S. government had no direct involvement in the operation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If we had been involved, it would have gone differently,” Pompeo said Wednesday in a briefing with reporters.

The secretary said he is prepared to release information at an appropriate time about “who bankrolled” the operation.

The U.S. considers Maduro’s leadership as illegitimate and backs the opposition leader Juan Guaidó. Pompeo in March unveiled a “pathway to democracy” for Venezuela for Maduro to step aside in favor of new, general elections.

Tech firms emerge as big winners in new COVID-19 economy

Tech stocks are defying gravity in the midst of what may be the worst economic downturn in a century. 

On Thursday, the tech-heavy NASDAQ Composite index turned positive for the year, after plunging more than 20 percent at one point in March from a record high hit a month earlier, even as indexes such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average remained down about 15 percent from 2019.

To some extent, the relative strength of tech stocks is the result of people increasingly turning to technology during a time of social isolation. But analysts say it’s also a sign of what’s to come as COVID-19 reshapes the economy.

“Investors now are looking forward to those kinds of business models and companies that will not only survive this environment but thrive as a result of it,” said Scott Clemons, Chief Investment Strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman.

That people have turned to technology during lockdowns and social distancing orders is self-evident to anyone living through the pandemic, but the data is still stark.

Online video meetings company Zoom went from just under 13 million active users in February to over 300 million in April. Its stock price has soared 130 percent this year despite security issues that forced its CEO to apologize. 

Netflix saw a 22 percent growth in its global subscribers, bringing its total to 182 million. It’s stock price has increased by a third, and is significantly higher than before the pandemic.

As people have turned to online orders, Amazon has seen its stock rise 24 percent, and the company is looking to hire thousands of new workers.

At the same time, major retailers including J. Crew and Neiman Marcus have filed for bankruptcy protections.

A survey by polling company Morning Consult found double-digit rises in people using their devices since the pandemic, including 33 percent who said they are watching more video content, even as a plurality said their smartphone usage hasn’t changed.

“We went from this world where everything was in person, where people would go to a restaurant for happy hour or saw your co-workers, and all of a sudden, in the last eight or so weeks, for most Americans tech is this foundation for them,” said Sam Sabin, who follows technology for Morning Consult.

“Most people aren’t always aware of how much we use technology, so the fact that at least a third of Americans noticed that they’re spending more time with their tech is notable,” she added.

Clemons says those changes will leave a lasting imprint on consumer and business habits after the pandemic ends.

“Even when there is a vaccine and everything is back to whatever normal is, when you look at the margin, there will be patterns that stick,” he said.

A Gallup poll from April supports that view.

It found that people were participating in activities online more than before, including 18 percent who said they are doing more virtual consultations with their doctors and 14 percent who say they are having groceries delivered more frequently.

And when Gallup asked people if they expected to keep up their new habits after the pandemic, large majorities said they would for activities such as ordering groceries (59 percent), ordering food for delivery (76 percent), and getting medicine or medical supplies online (71 percent).

Not every tech company has thrived as a result of the plague. Companies that popularized the sharing economy and the gig economy have seen their fortunes fade. Uber and Lyft have flailed as people stay home and avoid sharing closed quarters with strangers in cars, while Airbnb has laid off a quarter of its workforce as travel has dried up.

But the rally toward tech, as with the rally in the market from March lows, may be overstated.

“I do worry, a little bit, that they’ve anticipated it so mightily that it might be a little bit ahead of itself,” Clemons, from Brown Brothers Harriman, said.

Brett Ewing, Chief Market Strategist at First Franklin, agrees, saying that investors are rushing toward stocks that look like safe bets during uncertain times.

“Investors are crowding to one side of the boat,” he said. “Going forward, we don’t think that’s the opportunity. We think that the other side of the boat, when it flips, is going to be the place to be,” he added.

In his view, the small and medium stocks that have been hard-hit have more room to grow once the path forward on a public health front becomes clearer.

He also wonders if people will end up reverting to previous habits as soon as they are able to meet up again in person.

“The question is, after this pandemic, do people still want to do Zoom calls, or are they going to say ‘I don’t want to do that anymore, it reminds me of the padmenic and lockdown,’” he said.

Clemons has little doubt the current state of events will leave its marks on people’s behaviors, though he says the exuberance around it may be overstated at the moment.

If companies reassess the need for travel and expensive office space when video meetings have become the norm, even marginal changes could have big implications.

“There’s an old tech adage that applies here, which is that the implications of change are always overstated in the short run and understated in the long run,” he said.

Russia emerges as coronavirus hot spot; Putin sees approval ratings fall

Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinRussia emerges as coronavirus hot spot; Putin sees approval ratings fall Government warns Russia may try to advise 2020 candidates, campaigns in secret Pulitzer Prize awards include reporting on climate change, Putin MORE’s approval ratings are down as the country reported 10,000 new coronavirus cases for four consecutive days.

Russia’s leading independent pollster, the Levada Center, said Putin’s approvals have fallen to 59 percent, a 20-year low, The New York Times reported. This marks an 11-point drop from October and a 4-point drop from March.

The report comes as the nationwide total of coronavirus cases has risen to at least 165,929 and three Cabinet ministers, most recently culture minister Olga Lyubimova, have tested positive.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin has also tested positive, leading Putin to sign a decree appointing first Deputy Prime Minister Andrei Belousov as acting prime minister last week. Mishustin, 54, played a central role in the Russian response to the pandemic after becoming prime minister in January, but was forced to self-isolate after he was diagnosed.

The pandemic initially showed a slower growth rate in Russia than in the U.S. and Europe, but has reached a stage where total cases double every 10 days. The current growth rate is among the highest in the world.

Although a spokesman for Putin’s office said the Kremlin is taking the Levada data with a grain of salt, government-affiliated pollsters have shown Putin’s approvals declining, as well. Levada, which typically conducts polls face-to-face, took the April survey by phone due to the pandemic. As a result, some respondents may have been reluctant to voice their criticisms of Putin by phone, potentially overstating his support in the poll, according to the Times.

Russia imposed a partial lockdown in March, with residents of Moscow required to display travel permits to show they are essential workers. In late April, the government quarantined thousands of troops who had been set to participate in the now-canceled Victory Day parade through Red Square, citing possible exposure to the virus during rehearsals.

Click Here: gws giants guernsey 2019

Republicans say Trump should act against financial institutions that are unwilling to fund certain fossil fuel projects

A group of nearly 40 Republican lawmakers on Friday urged the Trump administration to take actions against financial institutions that have shied away from financing certain fossil fuel projects. 

In a letter to the White House, they claimed that policies against financing fossil fuel projects were discriminatory. 

“We urge you and your Administration to use every administrative and regulatory tool at your disposal to prevent America’s financial institutions from discriminating against America’s energy sector while they simultaneously enjoy the benefits of federal government programs,” said the letter, which was led by Sens. Dan SullivanDaniel Scott SullivanRepublicans say Trump should act against financial institutions that are unwilling to fund certain fossil fuel projects Senators request emergency funding for postal service in next coronavirus bill The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Experts increasingly think outdoors is safer MORE (R-Alaska) and Kevin CramerKevin John CramerRepublicans say Trump should act against financial institutions that are unwilling to fund certain fossil fuel projects McConnell under mounting GOP pressure to boost state aid The Hill’s Coronavirus Report: Sen. Coons says US needs to invest in vaccine manufacturing now; uncertainty looms over states reopening MORE (R-N.D.). 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Wall Street’s big banks, for example, should not be able to reap the benefits of participating in federally guaranteed loan programs laid out in the CARES Act, such as the Paycheck Protection Program or the trillion dollar … Federal Reserve facility lending programs, while simultaneously targeting American energy companies and workers, which again will be critical to our nation’s economic recovery,” they added. 

President TrumpDonald John TrumpGeorge Conway pens op-ed predicting Trump will lose Supreme Court case over tax disclosures Top intel official leaving post Eleven Secret Service agents test positive for COVID-19: report MORE has previously criticized the banks for withholding funds from certain fossil fuel projects. 

After Sullivan, in an Oval Office appearance last month, accused banks of “starting to discriminate against American energy companies” and trying to “discriminate against investment in my state in Alaska,” Trump replied “I don’t like that.”

“I like the idea of looking into that,” Trump replied, adding that the banks were “pushed by the radical left.”

Banks and other institutions have cited investment risk and social responsibility as they have backed away from financing such projects.

 

Top Democrat demands 'immediate explanation' from Barr after Flynn case dropped

The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee demanded answers from Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrBarr says it was ‘duty’ to drop Flynn case: ‘It upheld the rule of law’ Democrats renew calls for Barr to resign after DOJ drops Flynn case Pelosi slams move to drop Flynn case: ‘Barr’s politicization of justice knows no bounds’ MORE over the Justice Department’s decision to drop criminal charges against President TrumpDonald John TrumpGuidelines drafted by CDC were rejected by Trump administration citing religious freedom, economic concerns: report Tara Reade represented by well-known lawyer, Trump campaign donor Barr says it was ‘duty’ to drop Flynn case: ‘It upheld the rule of law’ MORE‘s former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Rep. Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerTop Democrat demands ‘immediate explanation’ from Barr after Flynn case dropped Yang sues over New York canceling Democratic presidential primary Nadler presses Barr over Trump using emergency powers during pandemic MORE (D-N.Y.) said the “outrageous” move called for an “immediate explanation.” He added that the House Judiciary Committee, which Nadler chairs, would summon Barr to the Capitol as soon as possible, after a March hearing with the attorney general was postponed due to the pandemic and said later in a statement he would ask the Inspector General to investigate.

“Rest assured, we are going to reschedule that hearing, ASAP, and demand answers!” Nadler said on Twitter.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced Thursday its intent to drop the criminal case against Flynn, who had previously pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russia during the presidential transition. Flynn later withdrew from his plea agreement.

Nadler said the DOJ’s move demonstrated the politicization of the top federal law enforcement agency under Trump. 

“Flynn PLEADED GUILTY to lying to investigators,” Nadler also said on Twitter. “The evidence against him is overwhelming. Now, a politicized DOJ is dropping the case.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The top Democrat followed up with a statement, calling the evidence against Flynn “overwhelming.”

“A politicized and thoroughly corrupt Department of Justice is going to let the President’s crony simply walk away,” Nadler said. “We are not supposed to get special treatment because we are friends with the President or refused to cooperate with federal investigators on his behalf. 

“The integrity of our criminal justice system is at stake, and the American people deserve answers,” he added. “I will also ask the Inspector General for the Department of Justice to investigate this matter.” 

Meanwhile, Rep. Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffHouse panel releases long-awaited transcripts from Russia probe Top Democrat demands ‘immediate explanation’ from Barr after Flynn case dropped Trump cheers DOJ move to drop Flynn case MORE (D-Calif.), who chairs the House Intelligence Committee, said the decision reflected “the worst politicization of the Justice Department in its history.”

“Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI about his illicit Russian contacts. His lies do not now become truths,” Schiff said in a tweet. “This dismissal does not exonerate him. But it does incriminate Bill Barr.”

In a court filing Thursday, the DOJ said newly uncovered FBI documents showed the investigation into Flynn was handled improperly and revealed that agents had misgivings about whether they believed Flynn had lied during his interview.

DOJ lawyers told the court that the FBI had initially moved to close the investigation in 2016 after finding a lack of evidence, but that the case remained open by mistake. 

Flynn would later provide agents a description of a conversation he had with a Russian diplomat in the weeks before Trump’s inauguration that prosecutors considered to be false and misleading, leading to Flynn’s guilty plea.

Some legal experts expressed dismay over the department’s change in course.

“It is highly unusual to dismiss a case after a defendant has pleaded guilty in open court,” said Barbara McQuade, a law professor at Michigan University and former federal prosecutor. “There is nothing in the public record to justify this dismissal.” 

— Updated at 4:59 p.m.

Harper Neidig contributed.

Click Here: gold coast suns 2019 guernsey