Sephora, caverne d’Ali Baba des cosmétiques en tout genre propose maintenant un espace Studio dans sa boutique du boulevard Saint Germain. Véritable institut au coeur du magasin (mais à l’abri du brouhaha), on y trouve quatre cabines de soins soit deux pour le corps, une pour le visage et la dernière qui dévoile une plage auto-bronzante. En plus, il y a aussi un nail bar et un make-up bar. Bref, on retrouve tout le spectre des soins qu’on aime ! Notons la bande son musicale, imaginée par Béatrice Ardisson, parfaite pour un moment rien qu’à soi qui mêle détente et glamour !Click Here: cheap all stars rugby jersey

C’est l’été et le temps des bonnes résolutions, sport, régime, repos et on arrête de fumer car on sait que la cigarette provoque le cancer. La cigarette peut tuer, les campagnes de sensibilisation le disent à juste titre mais elle pourrait d’abord vous abîmer la vue. Et cela, peu de fumeurs le savent.
C’est que la fumée de la cigarette n’est pas seulement irritante pour les yeux. En intervenant dans la micro-circulation cellulaire, elle provoque le vieillissement de la rétine. En fait, elle favorise la dégénérescence maculaire liée à l’âge (DMLA), une maladie de la partie centrale de la rétine qui touche en France plus d’un million de personnes. Plusieurs études françaises et britanniques portant sur la relation entre le tabac et la DMLA et publiées dans des revues scientifiques de premier ordre confirment ce danger. Ainsi, le risque pour un fumeur de développer la DMLA est jusqu’à 5 fois plus important que celui d’un non-fumeur. La DMLA est une maladie de la macula, la partie centrale de la rétine, la région qui permet de lire. Les gens atteints ne peuvent ni lire ni reconnaître les autres, puisque la DMLA ne laisse intacte que la vision périphérique ou latérale. Ils ne deviennent pas totalement aveugles, mais perdent tout le champ de vision utile pour la lecture, la conduite et la vision fine.
Le tabac agit aussi sur la cataracte qui se traduit par une opacification du cristallin.
Click Here: Cheap FIJI Rugby JerseyAlors cet été, jetez vos cigarettes et mettez aussi de bonnes lunettes de soleil qui doivent protéger les yeux de la luminosité, filtrer les UV et respecter les couleurs.Source : Communiqué de Rétina France du 28 juin 2007

L’enquête quadriennale en milieu scolaire (ESPAD) sur les drogues menée concomitamment dans plus de 35 pays européens vient de donner ses premiers résultats à l’occasion de la journée mondiale contre le tabac. En France, il apparaît que le tabagisme est en baisse chez les 16 ans, l’expérimentation de narguilé est courante chez les ados, tout comme les achats illicites des moins de 16 ans…

Menée en 1999, puis en 2003, l’enquête a été renouvelée en 2007 dans 202 établissements. Les premiers résultats issus de l’enquête 2007 sont publiés à l’occasion de la journée mondiale sans tabac du 31 mai 2008. Ils portent sur les consommations de tabac des jeunes collégiens et lycéens de 16 ans et l’accessibilité du tabac et les achats de cigarettes entre 13 et 17 ans malgré l’interdiction de vente aux mineurs de moins de 16 ans.
Les résultats 2007 confirment la baisse du tabagisme déjà observée en 2003. A 16 ans, six adolescents sur 10 (58 % des garçons et 61 % des filles) déclarent avoir fumé une cigarette au cours de leur vie : ils étaient près de 8 sur dix en 1999. L’usage quotidien est également en net recul : il est passé de 31 % en 1999 à 17 % en 2007. Ce mouvement de baisse est surtout le fait des fumeurs quotidiens consommant moins de dix cigarettes par jour. Leur part a été réduite de moitié depuis 1999 passant en 8 ans de 25 à 12 %. En revanche, la part des gros fumeurs (plus de 10 cigarettes) est restée stable entre 5 et 6 %.
Un adolescent âgé de 16 ans sur trois dit avoir déjà consommé du tabac à l’aide d’un narguilé (les filles autant que les garçons). Toutefois, seuls 4 % déclarent n’avoir expérimenté le tabac qu’avec un narguilé.
Pour la première fois, ESPAD permet d’apprécier la fréquence d’achat de tabac par les élèves de moins de 16 ans (interdit par décret depuis septembre 2004). L’interdiction de vente semble ne pas poser de difficulté d’approvisionnement aux plus jeunes fumeurs : 86 % des fumeurs quotidiens de 15 ans déclarent avoir acheté des cigarettes dans un débit de tabac au cours de 30 derniers jours (à 14 ans ils sont encore 75 % dans ce cas). En parallèle, la perception de l’accessibilité au tabac régresse fortement : en 1999, 87 % des jeunes de 16 ans estimaient qu’il leur serait facile de se procurer des cigarettes, ils sont 66 % en 2007.Source : Communiqué de Espad – mai 2008

The Trump administration is facing intense criticism for the lack of a national plan to handle the coronavirus pandemic as some states begin to reopen.

Public health experts, business leaders and current administration officials say the scattershot approach puts states at risk and leaves the U.S. vulnerable to a potentially open-ended wave of infections this fall.

The White House has in recent days sought to cast itself as in control of the pandemic response, with President TrumpDonald John TrumpState Department inspector general fired House passes massive T coronavirus relief package Analysis: Most states fall short of recommended coronavirus testing levels as some reopen MORE touring a distribution center to tout the availability of personal protective equipment and press secretary Kayleigh McEnany detailing for the first time that the administration did have its own pandemic preparedness plan.

ADVERTISEMENT

Still, the White House lacks a national testing strategy that experts say will be key to preventing future outbreaks and has largely left states to their own devices on how to loosen restrictions meant to slow the spread of the virus. Trump this week even suggested widespread testing may be “overrated” as he encouraged states to reopen businesses.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on Thursday night issued long-awaited guidance intended to aid restaurants, bars and workplaces as they allow employees and customers to return, but they appeared watered down compared to previously leaked versions. 

Some experts said the lack of clear federal guidance on reopening could hamper the economic recovery. 

“A necessary condition for a healthy economy is a healthy population. This kind of piecemeal reopening with everyone using different criteria for opening, we’re taking a big risk,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.

The lack of coherent direction from the White House was driven home this week by damaging testimony by a former top U.S. vaccine official who claims he was ousted from his post improperly.

“We don’t have a single point of leadership right now for this response, and we don’t have a master plan for this response. So those two things are absolutely critical,” said Rick Bright, who led the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority until he was demoted in late April.

The U.S. faces the “darkest winter in modern history” if it does not develop a more coordinated national response, Bright said. “Our window of opportunity is closing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

From the start, the White House has let states chart their own responses to the pandemic.

The administration did not issue a nationwide stay-at-home order, resulting in a hodgepodge of state orders at different times, with varying levels of restrictions.

Facing a widespread shortage, states were left to procure their own personal protective equipment, ventilators and testing supplies. Trump resisted using federal authority to force companies to manufacture and sell equipment to the U.S. government. 

Without clear federal guidance, state officials were competing against each other and the federal government, turning the medical supply chain into a free-for-all as they sought scarce and expensive supplies from private vendors on the commercial market. 

“The fact that we had questions about our ability to have enough mechanical ventilators, and you had states basically bidding against each other, trying to secure personal protective equipment …  it shouldn’t be happening during a pandemic,” said Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security.

Internally, the administration struggled to mount a unified front as various agencies jockeyed for control. Multiple agencies have been providing contradictory instructions.

At first, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar led the White House coronavirus task force.

Roughly a month, later he was replaced by Vice President Pence. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was later tasked with leading the response to get supplies to states, while senior White House adviser Jared KushnerJared Corey KushnerCoronavirus Report: The Hill’s Steve Clemons interviews Jane Harman Trump nominee for Consumer Product Safety Commission involved in CDC guidance shelving: AP GOP chairman dismisses moving Election Day: ‘No justification for changing the elections’ MORE led what has been dubbed a “shadow task force” to engage the private sector. Now, FEMA is reportedly winding down its role, and turning its mission back over to HHS.

The CDC has been largely absent throughout the pandemic. Director Robert Redfield has drawn the ire of President Trump as well as outside experts, and he has been seen infrequently at White House briefings.

“I think seeing the nation’s public health agency hobbled at a time like this and looking over its shoulder at its political bosses is something I hoped I would never see, and I’ve been working with the CDC for over 30 years,” said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of public health at Georgetown University. 

“I think that people will die because the public health agency has lost its visibility and its credibility and that it’s being politically interfered with,” he added.

The administration recently has taken some steps to improve on the initial response to the pandemic. 

Ventilator production has increased, and the U.S. is no longer seeing a shortage of the devices. 

Testing has improved dramatically as well, though experts think the U.S. needs to be testing thousands of more people per day before the country can reopen.

ADVERTISEMENT

The administration also unveiled plans to expand the Strategic National Stockpile’s supply of gowns, respirators, testing supplies and other equipment, after running out of supplies early in the pandemic.   

Adalja said the administration’s positive steps are coming way too late. 

“It’s May 15, we should have been in this position January 15,” he said.

McEnany on Friday for the first time detailed the White House’s preparedness plan that replaced the Obama-era pandemic playbook, an acknowledgement that Trump’s predecessor did leave a road map, despite claims to the contrary from some of the president’s allies.

She did not give many specifics on the previously unknown plan. Instead, McEnany declared the Trump administration’s handling of the virus had been “one of the best responses we’ve seen in our country’s history.”

Yet as states look to reopen businesses and get people back to work, the White House is taking a back seat as governors set their own guidelines for easing stay-at-home orders and restrictions on social activities. 

The White House in April issued a three-step plan for states to reopen their economies, but it has largely been ignored by states and by the president.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dozens of governors have begun easing restrictions on businesses and social activities without meeting the White House guidelines. Trump has been urging them to move even faster, backing anti-lockdown protesters in Michigan, Virginia, Minnesota and Pennsylvania.

Even scaled-down guidance from federal agencies is critical for providing a road map for state and local leaders, and for businesses considering how best to resume operations, said Neil Bradley, chief policy officer with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

“We need guidance because it helps instill confidence about the right types of approaches to take, but when you begin to move away from guidance and into either regulations or very strict approach, then that’s increasingly going to be unworkable in lots of different locations,” Bradley said.

  

Officials at Saint Peter’s Basilica on Thursday said the church would reopen its doors for Mass on May 18 with temperature checks for all worshippers.

Director of the Holy See Press Office Matteo Bruni said Papal Basilicas’s representatives discussed reopening measures in a meeting “promoted by the Secretariat of State,” Vatican News reported.

The representatives reportedly discussed “new aspects of Phase 2” reopening guidelines that Italy is now on, following lockdowns imposed due to the coronavirus.

According to Phase 2 guidelines, churches will be able to reopen for services and congregation on May 18, just in time for celebrating Holy Mass, the report added.

Bruni said in a press release that anyone who participates in liturgical celebrations would require examination before entry using a thermoscanner to curb further spread of COVID-19, according to Vatican News.

In the Lazio region of Italy, where Rome is located, there have been 7,364 reported cases of COVID-19, with 604 deaths resulting from the virus, according to Johns Hopkins data. Holy See has reported 12 cases in total with zero fatalities.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellMcConnell: ‘High likelihood’ that Congress will need to pass fifth coronavirus bill McConnell says Obama administration ‘did leave behind’ pandemic plan Rubio seen as possible successor to Burr as Intelligence chairman MORE (R-Ky.) said Thursday that Congress would likely need to pass a fifth coronavirus relief bill, but declined to give a timeline for additional legislation. 

McConnell, during a Fox News interview, said he did “anticipate” that Congress will need to “act again at some point” but that Republicans first wanted to review the roughly $2.8 trillion already appropriated by Congress. 

“I’m certainly not ruling out another fiscal package. And I would say the chairman of the Fed and I and the administration are not necessarily in different places,” McConnell said, referring to comments from Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell who said more spending could be “costly but worth it.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

McConnell hadn’t ruled out additional legislation but he told reporters earlier this week that he did not yet believe that it was needed. 

“I don’t think we have yet felt the urgency of acting immediately. That time could develop, but I don’t think it has yet,” McConnell added.

The comments drew fierce backlash from Democrats.

The House is also poised to pass a fifth coronavirus bill as soon as Friday. The legislation, which would cost roughly $3 trillion, includes another round of stimulus checks, more help for state and local governments and additional food assistance, among other provisions. 

Republicans, however, have warned that they will not be pressured to pass a bill just because the House does.

They’ve declared the bill “dead on arrival” in the Senate. McConnell on Thursday night called it a “liberal wishlist” a “parade of absurdities” and “hardly salvageable.”

ADVERTISEMENT

McConnell declined on Thursday night to say when the Senate would act. Senators in both parties have said they think it’s unlikely the Senate takes up a fifth coronavirus relief bill before the chamber leaves for a Memorial Day recess next week. 

“The president and Senate Republicans are going to be in the same place. We will let you know when we think the time is ripe to begin to move again. I think there’s a high likelihood that we’ll do another bill,” he said. 

When pressed if that would be “soon,” he noted that conversations were ongoing and that he had spoken with Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinMcConnell: ‘High likelihood’ that Congress will need to pass fifth coronavirus bill Less than 40 percent of small businesses have received emergency coronavirus loans: Census Bureau Congress’s paycheck protection program doing more to hurt than help MORE on Wednesday. 

“I think we all believe that another bill probably is going to be necessary. But I’m not prepared today to put a precise date on when that will be,” he said. 

Click Here: United Kingdom Rugby Jerseys

The tax-related provisions in House Democrats’ proposed coronavirus relief bill would reduce federal revenue by a net of $883 billion from fiscal years 2020 to 2030, Congress’s tax scorekeeper said in an analysis released Friday.

The analysis from the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) comes as the House is expected to pass the measure Friday on a near party-line vote. The bill is not expected to be taken up in the Republican-controlled Senate.

Much of the revenue loss from the bill’s tax provisions comes from those relating to direct payments to most Americans. The bill’s provision to create a second round of direct stimulus payments would lower federal revenue by $413 billion in fiscal years 2020 and 2021.

ADVERTISEMENT

That amount is greater than the $292 billion of revenue loss the JCT estimated would result from the one-time payments established by a law President TrumpDonald John TrumpState Department inspector general fired House passes massive T coronavirus relief package Analysis: Most states fall short of recommended coronavirus testing levels as some reopen MORE signed in March. The direct payments in House Democrats’ bill are more generous for dependents.

In addition to the second round of direct payments, the JCT estimates that several other provisions in the Democrats’ bill would each lower federal revenue by more than $100 billion over a decade, including those to temporarily expand the child tax credit, eliminate the cap on the state and local tax deduction for two years, expand the employee retention tax credit, and provide COBRA subsidies to help workers losing their employer-sponsored health insurance.

Not every tax provision in House Democrats’ bill would result in reduced revenue. The JCT estimates that provisions relating to the tax treatment of businesses’ net operating losses would raise $254 billion from 2020 to 2030. These provisions would undo tax provisions in the CARES Act and make permanent a limit on the amount of losses owners of non-corporate businesses can deduct against non-business income.

The group’s analysis focuses just on the provisions in the bill that have an impact on federal revenue. The Congressional Budget Office is expected to release a fuller estimate of the cost of the bill at a later point. House Democrats expect the bill as a whole to have a cost of about $3 trillion.

The Pentagon on Friday defended its decision to remove an official from her role as a go-between with private industry in the race to increase medical equipment to fight coronavirus, following reports that the White House ordered the change.

The day prior, Jennifer Santos, the Defense Department’s (DOD) Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Policy, was abruptly removed from her job to one within the Navy.

CNN reported at the time that the decision was not made by Santos’s immediate boss, the Pentagon’s top acquisition official Ellen Lord. Instead, the order to remove her came from the White House.

ADVERTISEMENT

Top DOD spokesman Jonathan Hoffman did not say where the decision ultimately came from, only allowing that the department moved Santos to the Navy’s acquisition arm as “she had some capabilities and skills that they thought would be helpful.”

He added that Lord “was aware of a change that was being made,” and that it was an “opportunity” as the Pentagon moves forward with its role in “Operation Warp Speed,” the Trump administration’s push to accelerate coronavirus vaccine development.

Hoffman said the Pentagon can now “identify somebody with a different set of background in manufacturing to work with industry.”

Santos, who had been in the job since June 2019, in the last few months had worked to use the Defense Production Act (DPA) to increase the U.S. supply of ventilators, personal protective equipment and testing materials during the COVID-19 pandemic, which Lord had praised.

In the early months of the pandemic, President TrumpDonald John TrumpState Department inspector general fired House passes massive T coronavirus relief package Analysis: Most states fall short of recommended coronavirus testing levels as some reopen MORE appeared hesitant to fully use the DPA — which allows the government to demand its orders be given priority by manufacturers — prompting criticism.

Pressed on whether the change was a sign of a shift in strategy for the administration to obtain medical equipment, Hoffman replied that he “wouldn’t say it’s moving in a new direction.”

“It was just a personnel change that took place and we’re going to take advantage of it to bolster the team the Navy has as well as try to find a different skill set within the [acquisition and sustainment] portfolio,” he said.

A federal judge on Wednesday rejected two Illinois churches’ requests for a temporary hold on Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s (D) stay-at-home order.

Elim Romanian Pentecostal Church in Chicago and Logos Baptist Ministries in Niles had called for a temporary restraining order against Pritzker’s order, asking for permission to hold services with reduced seating, designated entrances and exits and hand sanitizer for all attendees, The Associated Press reported.

The Chicago church held full services last weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman rejected the churches equating houses of worship with businesses deemed essential such as grocery stores, saying the more apt comparison would be to closed businesses and institutions like schools and movie theaters.

Gettleman said in his ruling that even with the precautions described, the virus could easily spread in a worship setting, saying their desire to have services “cannot outweigh the health and safety of the public.”

Click Here: United Kingdom Rugby Jerseys

Pritzker recently modified his stay-at-home order, saying the “free exercise of religion” would be permitted but in-person religious gatherings were restricted to 10 people or fewer.

Both churches have filed to appeal the ruling, which came two weeks after another judge, District Judge John Lee, similarly ruled against a church in northwest Illinois seeking a temporary restraining order against the order.

“The Court understands Plaintiffs’ desire to come together for prayer and fellowship, particularly in these trying times,” Lee wrote in his opinion.

“But even the foundational rights secured by the First Amendment are not without limits; they are subject to restriction if necessary to further compelling government interests — and, certainly, the prevention of mass infections and deaths qualifies. After all, without life, there can be no liberty or pursuit of happiness,” he added.

Pastor Steve Cassell of the Beloved Church in Lena said he was prepared to take the case to the Supreme Court despite Lee’s ruling. Pritzker’s modified order is set to expire May 30.

Travel on American airlines fell 51 percent in March as the coronavirus pandemic took hold in the United States, according to Transportation Department data released Tuesday.

Travel on U.S. airlines fell to 38.7 million passengers in March, a 51 percent drop from March 2019. The reported decrease ended a 29-month year-over-year rise. The total number of domestic and international passengers was just slightly more than those who flew in the month following the September 11 attacks in 2001.

Travel on U.S. airlines has fallen further since March and is currently down about 94 percent, while total flights are down by about 70 percent, according to Reuters.

ADVERTISEMENT

Total domestic travel, meanwhile, fell to 34.1 million passengers in March, down from 69.6 million in March 2019, while international travel fell to 4.6 million in March from 9.9 million in March 2019. The international decline was driven in part by White House restrictions on travel from China and parts of Europe due to the pandemic.

The report comes a month after the U.S. Treasury approved $25 billion in cash grants to airlines. The money came with conditions, including a prohibition on stock buybacks, caps on executive compensation and a ban on laying off workers through Sept. 30. United Airlines, however, has said the money will be insufficient to keep them from making layoffs.

Airlines for America, a trade group that represents United and several other major U.S. airlines including Southwest, Delta and American, said last week that airlines are losing more than $10 billion a month with an average of fewer than 24 passengers per flight, according to Reuters.

Internationally, the carriers are averaging 29 passengers a flight, while domestically, they average only 17, according to the group, which added that net booked passengers are down nearly 100 percent year-over-year. U.S. airlines have canceled about 80 percent of scheduled flights into June, according to Reuters.