DVD- Megan Fox non censurée mais…

La bombe Megan Fox pourrait bien faire exploser les ventes du DVD du film Jennifer’s Body qui nous est promis en version « non censurée »! Et tandis qu’elle multiplie les séances de poses pour les magazines et le plaisir des yeux de ces messieurs, elle vient de récolter le revers de la médaille: un « anti-prix » de la pire actrice.

Megan Fox a eu du flair en acceptant son rôle de croqueuse d’hommes (et de femmes) au sens propre comme figuré. Car non seulement le film Jennifer’s Body a suscité une vague d’intérêt énorme autour de la beauté en question, mais il s’apprête à vivre une seconde carrière plutôt intéressante… Le 24 février, Megan Fox revient en effet dans Jennifer’s Body, mais cette fois en DVD et Blu-Ray dans une version non censurée. Ce qui promet de torrides minutes supplémentaires à un film où la sensualité de Megan Fox n’était pas totalement secondaire…

Bonne nouvelle pour les plus accros: le DVD sera accompagnée d’un poster de la jeune star.

Laquelle connaît des succès divers, tel ce prix, peu enviable, de la pire actrice de 2009(même si elle est “laplus sexy de l’année”) selon un récent classement réalisé par le site Moviefone.com. Elle peut se consoler avec ses titres de “Femme La Plus Hot De L’Année 2008 pour le magasine FHM et de Femme La Plus Sexy De L’Année 2009 par les Teen Choice Awards!

Un engouement quasi général pour sa plastique qui n’est pas seulement un objet de fierté peronnel pour Megan Fox mais aussi un outil d’autopromotion et/ou source de cachets non négligeables. Ainsi, en quelques jours, on retrouve du Megan Fox en pied sur la couverture de Cosmopolitan Espagne et, dans tous ses états, pour le Men’s Style australien (regardez ci-dessous). Car là aussi, ce n’est pas vraiment ce qu’elle y raconte qui passionne le lectorat, mais plutôt ses arguments certes silencieux mais beaucoup plus visibles…

J.-F.T.

Mercredi 30 décembre 2009

Click Here: new zealand rugby team jerseys

Bertrand Cantat: noir destin

L’avenir de chancelle sous le poids d’un double drame. Après le décès, lors d’une dispute, de en 2003, la mère des enfants du rocker de Noir Désir vient de succomber à ce qui semble être un suicide. Et maintenant, que va-t-il pouvoir faire?

Ses dames furent des drames, ses amours deux fois trompés par la mort. Bertrand Cantat peut-il connaître un bonheur qui ne se finisse pas six pieds sous terre? La question peut exciter l’imagination de la rue mais surtout brûler les ailes d’un poète et briser le destin d’un homme. Quid de Noir Désir dans les mois qui viennent? Que fera Bertrand Cantat de ce nouvel enfer?

L’année 2010 était pourtant annoncée comme celle de la rédemption, vaille que vaille, du meurtrier de Marie Trintignant, morte sous les coups de Bertrand Cantat, à Vilnius, au coeur de l’été 2003. Un nouvel album et/ou un retour à la scène, après deux titres inédits déjà mis en ligne sur le site internet du groupe, avaient fait le buzz sur Internet et promettaient une flopée de pages web dans les mois à venir, soudain noyées dans la marée noire d’un nouveau fait-divers nocturne avec le suicide de Kristina Rady.

Certes, Bertrand Cantat, « digne et abattu », est ressorti des locaux de la PJ après avoir été auditionné. Certes- bis, « selon les premières constatations confirmés par certains éléments techniques, le décès est dû à un suicide par pendaison ». Mais il y a culpabilité et sentiment de culpabilité. Une mort reste une mort.

Bien sûr, si l’hypothèse du suicide est confirmée, notamment par l’autopsie de Kristina Rady et d’éventuels autres éléments (lettre, déclarations à des témoins…) reste ce malheur qui semble coller à la peau de Bertrand Cantat. Un chanteur soutenu par de nombreux Français. Mais il lui faudra être fort pour ses enfants, et notamment pour un garçon qui a découvert le corps de sa mère. La bataille de Cantat sera intérieure avant de reprendre le combat dans les lumières bizarres des arènes du rock. La culpabilité n’est pas qu’une affaire de droit. Et l’on peut être injuste à son propre égard. Car le juge le plus impitoyable siège parfois en nous-même.

Jean-Frédéric Tronche

Lundi 11 janvier 2010

Suivez l’actu Gala sur nos comptesTwitteretFacebook

Trump waives federal student loan interest in response to coronavirus

President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump faces toughest crisis of presidency in coronavirus House passes bill to help prop up economy from coronavirus White House physician: Trump doesn’t require test after exposure to 2 people with coronavirus MORE said Friday that he had waived all federal student loan interest “until further notice” amid the coronavirus outbreak.

Trump said he had done so by executive action during a ceremony in the Rose Garden Friday afternoon.

“To help our students and their families, I have waived interest on all student loans held by federal government agencies and that will be until further notice,” Trump said. “That’s a big thing for a lot of students who have been left in the middle right now.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump also announced at the ceremony that he would declare a national emergency over the virus, which will free up federal resources to help state and local governments respond to the pandemic. 

Several colleges and universities across the country have closed and shifted to remote classes amid the outbreak. Trump’s decision will help Americans who may struggle to keep up with student loan payments during the outbreak, which has rattled the stock market and sowed concerns about the adverse impact on the U.S. economy. 

Trump sought to project confidence about his administration’s response to the virus on Friday and said the country would “eventually turn a corner” on the virus. 

 

Click Here: Maori All Blacks Store

Biden endorses Warren bankruptcy plan

Joe BidenJoe BidenFormer Pennsylvania governor: Biden nomination will be ‘virtually clinched’ after next Tuesday How coronavirus is changing Sunday’s debate The Memo: Coronavirus scrambles the art of campaigning MORE is endorsing Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenBiden endorses Warren bankruptcy plan Castro forms PAC, boosts five House candidates Both parties see gains on environmental scorecard MORE’s (D-Mass.) bankruptcy plan as the former vice president works to unite a Democratic Party fractured between centrists and progressives. 

The endorsement of the plan Warren laid out in her ultimately failed presidential bid, which a Biden campaign official confirmed to The Hill, is a stark departure for the former vice president. Warren’s plan explicitly sought to repeal parts of a 2005 bankruptcy bill Biden backed in the Senate.

Warren’s plan, announced in January, would scrap several aspects of the 2005 law, including means testing, separate bankruptcy processes for consumers based on wealth, credit counseling and other requirements she slammed as “onerous and complicated.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The plan also proposes allowing student loans to be discharged during bankruptcy, a boost for younger voters — a key demographic with which Biden is hoping to make up ground.

Warren, who was a bankruptcy law professor in 2005, was a chief academic critic of the law while Biden was championing it in the Senate. The legislation ultimately passed the House and Senate with bipartisan support and was signed by former President George W. Bush.

The reversal from Biden comes as the former vice president builds a growing delegate lead over Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersFormer Pennsylvania governor: Biden nomination will be ‘virtually clinched’ after next Tuesday How coronavirus is changing Sunday’s debate The Memo: Coronavirus scrambles the art of campaigning MORE (I-Vt.) and works to unite the party as he gears up for the general election. 

Sanders, a staunch progressive, has torn into Biden over his past support for trade deals such as the North American Free Trade Agreement and comments about Social Security, possibly intensifying the fissures within the party.

Yet despite the attacks, Biden has shifted to appealing to Sanders and his supporters ahead of an increasingly likely match up with President TrumpDonald John TrumpFormer Pennsylvania governor: Biden nomination will be ‘virtually clinched’ after next Tuesday How coronavirus is changing Sunday’s debate The Memo: Coronavirus scrambles the art of campaigning MORE.

“I want to thank Bernie Sanders and his supporters for their tireless energy and their passion,” Biden said this week after beating Sanders in a handful of primary states. “We share a common goal, and together we’ll defeat Donald Trump.”

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

American Airlines pilot based in Dallas-Fort Worth tests positive for the coronavirus

A pilot for American Airlines in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas, area has tested positive for the coronavirus causing COVID-19.

The company said in a statement on Thursday that the airline’s chief medical officer and officials from its pilots office are in contact with the affected pilot, according to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

“We are in close contact with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and public health officials and are coordinating with them on all required health and safety measures,” the airline wrote.

Click Here: Putters

ADVERTISEMENT

A representative from the company would not say what date the pilot and airline learned the results of the pilot’s test for COVID-19, according to the report.

American Airlines said the company did not think the virus would pose a risk to those on board the plane, with a spokesperson telling The Hill, “The risk of transmission to passengers is low.”

American Airlines is based in Fort Worth and maintains around 30,000 employees in the area.

The state of Texas has recorded a total of 28 active cases of coronavirus, according to Johns Hopkins Center for Systems Science and Engineering.

The US has reported over 1,700 cases of the virus as of Friday, with 41 confirmed deaths since the start of the outbreak in the country.

Two NY State Assembly members test positive for COVID-19

Two members of the New York State Assembly tested positive for novel coronavirus (COVID-19), Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) announced Saturday evening. 

Helene Weinstein (D) and Charles Barron (D), both Brooklyn-based lawmakers who have contracted the virus, have been in their districts since early March, the governor noted. The two have not been up to Albany in that time, according to a recent statement obtained by The Hill.  

“We have spoken with the Senate and are undertaking an intensive cleaning of the Capital and the Legislative Office Building. All legislators and staff that have come in contact with these members will be tested to ensure the safety of everyone,” Cuomo in the statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

The governor added that “out of an abundance of caution,” the state capitol will be closed starting Sunday.

“We are working hand in glove to contain and mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 in New York, but we will continue to act aggressively to protect the public health,” Cuomo added. 

This week, Cuomo declared a state of emergency in the Empire State, and New York City Mayor Bill de BlasioBill de BlasioTwo NY State Assembly members test positive for COVID-19 New York Gov. Cuomo announces first death from coronavirus in the state Sunday shows preview: Lawmakers gear up for another week fighting the coronavirus, seek to curb fallout MORE has done the same for the largest city in the nation. 

There are currently 525 confirmed cases of the virus in the state and two deaths, according to the Johns Hopkins Center for Systems Science and Engineering.

Click Here: Golf special

Rockets hit Iraqi base housing US troops: report

A salvo of rockets hit an Iraqi base on Saturday outside of Baghdad that houses American troops, Iraqi officials told The Associated Press.

Officials told the wire service that over a dozen rockets landed near the base, Camp Taji, and that two Iraqi soldiers were wounded in the attack.

The strike comes days after Kataib Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed militia in Iraq, attacked Camp Taji, killing two American troops as well as a British service member.

ADVERTISEMENT

Click Here: Golf special

This prompted the U.S. to launch retaliatory airstrikes against five weapons storage facilities of the Iran-backed militia on Thursday.

Gen. Frank McKenzie, the U.S.’s top commander in the Middle East, said on Friday that the threat from Iran and its proxy militias remain high.

“I think tensions have actually not gone down,” McKenzie said. “I still think they are actively seeking ways to achieve destabilization that would allow them to escape the strictures of the maximum pressure campaign.”

There was no immediate response from coalition forces regarding the attack on Saturday, according to the AP.

Overnight Defense: Pentagon confirms Iran behind recent rocket attack | Esper says 'all options on the table' | Military restricts service member travel over coronavirus

Happy Thursday and welcome to Overnight Defense. I’m Ellen Mitchell, and here’s your nightly guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. CLICK HERE to subscribe to the newsletter.

 

THE TOPLINE: The Pentagon’s top leaders on Thursday confirmed that Iranian-backed militia groups were behind the rocket attack in Iraq that killed two U.S. troops and one British soldier a day earlier, saying that “all options are on the table” for a response.  

“Yesterday’s attack by Iranian-backed Shia militia groups consisted of multiple indirect fires that originated from a stationary platform and was clearly targeting coalition and partnered forces on Camp Taji,” Defense Secretary Mark EsperMark EsperUS retaliates with missile strikes in Iraq Overnight Defense: Pentagon confirms Iran behind recent rocket attack | Esper says ‘all options on the table’ | Military restricts service member travel over coronavirus Graham warns of ‘aggressive’ response to Iran-backed rocket attack that killed US troops MORE told reporters at the Pentagon.

“Let me be clear, the United States will not tolerate attacks against our people, our interests or our allies,” Esper added.

“All options are on the table as we work with our partners to bring the perpetrators to justice and maintain deterrence. … We will take any action necessary to protect our forces in Iraq and the region,” he said.

The attack: The U.S.-led coalition in Iraq on Wednesday evening announced that 18 Katyusha rockets hit Camp Taji north of Baghdad, killing three and wounding 12. Iraqi forces found a rocket-rigged truck a few miles from the base, the coalition said.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, who spoke alongside Esper, echoed that all options are on the table and “we’re looking at everything,” as a potential response.

“You don’t get to shoot at our bases, kill and wound Americans and get away with it,” Esper said.

Trump in the loop: The Pentagon chief also said he spoke to President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Hill’s Morning Report — Coronavirus tests a partisan Washington The Memo: Virus crisis upends political world Bill to protect children online ensnared in encryption fight MORE on Wednesday about the attack and the president gave him all the authority he needs to possibly respond.

Esper replied that he’s “not going to take any option off the table right now,” when asked if a U.S. military response could include strikes on Iran.

Earlier…: U.S. officials previously blamed Kataib Hezbollah for a rocket attack in December that struck a base near Kirkuk, killing one U.S. contractor and wounding four U.S. troops.

That December attack set off an escalating cycle that brought the United States and Iran to the brink of war, culminating with a U.S. drone strike that killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani.

Iran, in turn, followed with a missile attack on bases in Iraq that gave more than 100 U.S. troops brain injuries.

‘Deterrence’ in question: U.S. officials have touted the Soleimani strike as having “reestablished deterrence” against Iran.

But Sen. Jack ReedJohn (Jack) Francis ReedSenators press EU to sanction Putin associate for election meddling Overnight Defense: Pentagon confirms Iran behind recent rocket attack | Esper says ‘all options on the table’ | Military restricts service member travel over coronavirus Top general: Iran-backed militia in Iraq ‘only group known’ to have carried out type of attack that killed two US troops MORE (R.I.), the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Wednesday night’s attack appears to undermine that talking point.

“The rocket attack on Camp Taji last night, reportedly carried out by an Iranian-backed militia, would seem to challenge the notion that we have reestablished deterrence with respect to Iran,” he said.

McKenzie argued that deterrence has been restored for attacks directly from Iran, but acknowledged proxy groups continue to pose a threat.

“I believe we have reestablished a rough form of deterrence, what I would call contested deterrence with Iran at the level of state-on-state attacks,” he said.

Lawmakers voice warnings: Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamThe Hill’s Morning Report — Coronavirus tests a partisan Washington Bill to protect children online ensnared in encryption fight Trudeau’s wife tests positive for coronavirus MORE (R-S.C.) warned Thursday of an “aggressive” response to the Iraq rocket strike.

“I think the president’s going to be very aggressive,” said Graham, a top GOP defense voice and close ally of Trump “At the time of our choosing, we should hit back.”

Asked if he meant retaliation against the militia or Iran itself, Graham said, “the people who actually launched the rockets.”

“Put Iran on notice that we’re going to hold them accountable in the future for this,” Graham added.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim RischJames (Jim) Elroy RischOvernight Defense: Pentagon confirms Iran behind recent rocket attack | Esper says ‘all options on the table’ | Military restricts service member travel over coronavirus Graham warns of ‘aggressive’ response to Iran-backed rocket attack that killed US troops GOP lawmaker makes unannounced trip to northeastern Syria MORE (R-Idaho) also warned that “if I was the Iran proxy group, I would not sleep well tonight.”

 

CORONAVIRUS UPDATE: Defense Secretary Mark Esper said there are now six confirmed cases of service members testing positive for coronavirus, as well as seven military dependents.

Canceled tours: The news comes the same day the White House and Pentagon announced that tours will be suspended due to the coronavirus outbreak. 

Pentagon press secretary Alyssa Farah tweeted that, as of Thursday morning, all tours would be canceled “until further notice.”

“We regret the inconvenience to our more than 2,000 visitors a week, but our key priorities are the health of our people & ensuring our ability to continue executing vital national security missions,” she said.

Travel cut back: The Defense Department (DOD) on Wednesday night announced that it will implement a 60-day travel ban for service members, DOD civilians and their families to and from countries whose populations have been the most stricken by coronavirus, also known as COVID-19.

The restrictions, which go into effect Friday, ban all travel to, throughout and from locations designated as Level 3 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including China, South Korea, Iran and Italy.

In addition, DOD civilians and service members’ families are banned from traveling to Level 2 countries, which currently include Japan, for 60 days.

“The Department of Defense’s top priority remains the protection and welfare of our people,” Defense Secretary Mark Esper said in a statement. “While directing this prudent action, I continue to delegate all necessary authority to commanders to make further decisions based on their assessments to protect their people and ensure mission readiness.”

Details on the travel ban: The strict ban in Level 3 countries encompasses “all forms of travel,” including reassignments known as permanent changes of station, temporary duty and government-funded leave.

“Service secretaries and commanders may issue waivers to this policy as they determine necessary to ensure mission readiness and address specific cases,” the Pentagon said in a statement.  

For the next 60 days, DOD will also implement “enhanced health care protocols” for anyone traveling to Level 2 or Level 3 nations. 

More exercises curtailed: Also on Wednesday the U.S. military said it will reduce the number of troops expected to participate in a multinational exercise in Europe for the “health protection” of forces, citing concerns about the coronavirus.

“After careful review of the ongoing Defender-Europe 20 exercise activities and in light of the current Coronavirus outbreak, we will modify the exercise by reducing the number of U.S. participants,” the U.S. European Command said in a statement.

“Activities associated with the exercise will be adjusted accordingly and we’ll work closely with Allies and partners to meet our highest priority training objectives.”

The news comes the same day the Defense Department announced it would pull U.S. forces from a multinational Arctic exercise in Norway that also has been curtailed.

In addition, several exercises based in South Korea have been canceled, as have two joint drills with Israel. The multinational Operation African Lion has also been pared down.

China pushes conspiracy theory: A spokesman for the Chinese government on Thursday promoted a conspiracy theory that the coronavirus was brought to the city of Wuhan by the U.S. military.

“It might be US Army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan,” said Zhao Lijian, a Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman, Business Insider reported.

The comment, an alternate explanation Beijing is pushing amid global criticism of the country’s failure to mitigate the virus, comes as the Chinese government has increasingly disputed widespread international reporting that the virus was first detected in Wuhan.

The conspiracy theory, which has recently gained steam in China, instead suggests the virus was brought to the country in 2019 by U.S. athletes participating in the Military World Games that were held in Wuhan.

In comments at the Heritage Foundation on Wednesday, White House national security adviser Robert O’Brien described China’s response to the virus as a cover up, saying Beijing’s response had cost the international community months that could have been used to prepare for the coronavirus.

 

ON TAP FOR TOMORROW

Special Inspector General John Sopko will discuss “Corruption: A Threat to Rule of Law and Sustainable Peace in Afghanistan” at 8 a.m. at the University Club in Washington, D.C. 

 

ICYMI

— The Hill: McConnell, top GOP senators throw support behind surveillance deal as deadline looms

— Defense News: Lawmakers criticize Pentagon’s funding plan for science and tech; official also talks ‘Star Trek’

Click Here: pinko shop cheap

Full appeals court to rehear case over McGahn subpoena

A full federal appeals court bench will reconsider a Democratic bid for the testimony of former White House counsel Don McGahn, after a three-judge panel said he could defy a congressional subpoena. 

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday said a majority of judges had voted to vacate the panel’s ruling and hold a rehearing, which will take place April 28. 

The review by the full bench, a relatively rare procedural allowance, gives the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee another chance to persuade the court to enforce its subpoena against McGahn, whom lawmakers consider an eyewitness to wrongdoing by Trump. 

ADVERTISEMENT

It could also yield an important separation-of-powers precedent that redraws the line between congressional oversight and White House immunity.

Seven of the nine judges who will preside over the full court review were appointed by Democratic presidents. Two Republican-appointed judges were recused from the rehearing.

The Friday order vacated the three-judge panel’s 2-1 decision last month that McGahn could defy Democrats’ subpoenas. That ruling overturned a lower court judge who said McGahn was obligated to testify before Congress. 

The three-judge panel’s majority comprised two judges appointed by Republican presidents, while the lone dissent was cast by a Clinton appointee. 

In its Feb. 28 opinion, the majority ruled that courts were powerless to enforce the McGahn subpoena over Trump’s objection because it concerned a political dispute that was up to the White House and Congress to resolve. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Had the ruling stood, it would have dealt a severe blow to Congress’s oversight authority and laid down a favorable precedent for future White House defiance.

The Friday order also said the full bench would hear a dispute over whether Democratic lawmakers have the legal right to sue to stop executive agencies from spending money to build a border wall. A lower court judge in that case, U.S. House of Representatives v. Mnuchin, said the lawmakers lacked the standing to sue.

The House Judiciary Committee subpoenaed McGahn in April, just days after the release of former special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerCNN’s Toobin warns McCabe is in ‘perilous condition’ with emboldened Trump CNN anchor rips Trump over Stone while evoking Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting The Hill’s 12:30 Report: New Hampshire fallout MORE’s findings. The report concluded a nearly two-year investigation into Russia’s 2016 election interference, the Trump campaign’s contacts with Moscow and Trump’s possible obstruction of justice.

McGahn played a central role in the obstruction phase of the probe, which examined 10 “episodes” of possible obstruction by Trump. The report found “substantial evidence” that Trump leaned on McGahn to fire Mueller.

Mueller declined to say if Trump obstructed justice, but Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrHillicon Valley: Internet providers vow to maintain service amid coronavirus | Pentagon looks to revisit ‘war cloud’ decision | Gates steps down from Microsoft board Full appeals court to rehear case over McGahn subpoena Ivanka Trump works from home after interacting with official who tested for coronavirus MORE and then-Deputy Attorney General Rod RosensteinRod RosensteinFull appeals court to rehear case over McGahn subpoena Graham starts closed-door depositions in FISA probe Attorney General Barr is in a mess — and has no one to blame but himself MORE concluded Trump had not done so.

In addition to McGahn’s perspective on the obstruction investigation, House Democrats are also interested in his testimony related to Trump’s removal of both former national security adviser Michael Flynn and former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyFull appeals court to rehear case over McGahn subpoena Tucker Carlson: Biden’s ‘fading intellect’ an ‘opportunity’ for Democrats to control him Comey endorses Biden; campaign says no thanks MORE.

Ministers back Horizon 2020 research programme

Ministers back Horizon 2020 research programme

Support for EU research scheme.

By

Updated

European Union ministers for research and innovation today reached agreement on the structure of the EU’s Horizon 2020 research programme.

The programme, which has a planned budget of €80 billion for 2014-20, was proposed by the European Commission in December. It brings all EU research support programmes under one umbrella.

“Europe finds itself in a difficult situation. With a severe economic crisis and high youth unemployment, the only way to create new growth and jobs is by investing heavily in knowledge and innovation.” said Morten Østergaard, the Danish minister for science, innovation and higher education, after the meeting in Brussels.

The Danish EU presidency said the Council’s position places a more of an emphasis on an interdisciplinary approach than the Commission’s original proposal did. It also includes increased efforts to reduce bureaucracy, which was already a major aim of the Commission’s proposal.

Negotiations will now begin on the budget allocation for the specific programmes of Horizon 2020. Once a Council position is reached on the funding of the programme, negotiations will begin with the European Parliament.

Parliament position

Maria da Graça Carvalho, a Portuguese centre-right MEP who is in charge of the dossier for the European Parliament, today published her draft report on Horizon 2020. It calls for provisions to be inserted to ensure that the research funding is more equitably distributed throughout Europe.

This could include allowing universities from wealthy countries to team up with counterparts from less-wealthy states to apply for funding as part of a  ‘twinning’ scheme. Another idea is to create a grant programme to help researchers return to their home countries after a spell in wealthier member states. The Commission and member states have resisted the idea of geographic quotas.

There has been concern that the current climate of austerity would make member states cut the Horizon 2020 budget. But the recent impetus for growth is expected to boost those who want to increase research funding.

Authors:
Dave Keating 

Click Here: cheap Cowboys jersey