Ex-Google executive hammers company over diversity

A former Google executive on Thursday unleashed a barrage of criticism over the tech giant’s diversity efforts, painting Google as hypocritical and insincere over its public claims that it is trying to cultivate an inclusive workplace. 

Ross LaJeunesse, a trusted Google veteran who launched a bid for Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsEx-Google executive hammers company over diversity Schumer: Newly revealed emails a ‘devastating blow’ to McConnell’s impeachment trial plans Pelosi faces decision on articles of impeachment MORE‘s (R-Maine) seat after the company allegedly pushed him out last year, is publicly criticizing Google for disregarding his complaints about the mistreatment of minority employees during his decadelong tenure. 

LaJeunesse penned a Medium op-ed divulging his struggles at Google on Thursday morning, making him the most senior executive yet to publicly raise concerns about retaliation and mistreatment at the Silicon Valley behemoth. He is claiming that he was effectively fired after pushing for a human rights framework within the company for years. In a statement, a Google spokeswoman said LaJeunesse’s former job was “eliminated as part of the broad reorganization of our policy team,” which affected many employees. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The stories from LaJeunesse come as Google is facing an escalating wave of allegations and multiple labor complaints from employees who say they were punished for engaging in employee activism at the company. 

In a follow-up interview with The Hill on Thursday morning, LaJeunesse detailed several instances in which he said Google’s expansive human resources department disregarded his reports about racist comments and insensitive exercises. Ultimately, he says Google pushed him out of his job.

“There was no other way of explaining what had happened to me, other than my consistent advocacy for human rights,” LaJeunesse said.

Last year, the former executive-turned-politician said he was quietly ousted from Google’s Diversity and Inclusion Council after he started raising concerns about a “diversity” exercise that left himself and two women of color feeling extremely uncomfortable.

The exercise, run by Google’s human resources department, asked employees to split off into groups according to their identities — including “brown people,” “homos” and “Asians.” LaJeunesse, who came out as gay when he was 20 years old, said he ended up speaking out when the exercise devolved into employees shouting pejorative statements about gay people in the “homos” room. 

ADVERTISEMENT

He said the employees were asked to “come up with a list of stereotypes and shout them out into the room,” resulting in a group of people shouting, “Promiscuous! Love to party!” 

“I’m probably the most senior person in the room and I stopped it,” LaJeunesse, who was the head of Google’s global head of international relations in Washington, D.C., recounted. He said he warned the group: “This has gone off the rails, these are stereotypes only.” 

Later, he spoke to a woman of color who felt so hurt by the exercise that she began to cry, he said. As a South Asian woman, she told him, she wasn’t sure which room she would be welcomed into — and found that she was not welcomed in the “brown people” room. 

And another woman, who identifies as a Latina lesbian, allegedly told LaJeunesse, “I thought this was Google and you guys knew how to do this stuff. That was f—ed up.” 

For months, LaJeunesse pressed the human relations department to hold a follow-up conversation about the experience and learn from any mistakes. But the department did not hold any comprehensive conversation, instead opting to have one-on-one conversations with the women that felt like “ticking a box.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

A few months later, LaJeunesse discovered that he had been removed from Google’s diversity and inclusion council when the company sent him a bonus with a note that read, “Thanks for your service on the diversity and inclusion council.” No one spoke to him about it directly. 

In a statement to The Hill, a Google spokeswoman did not deny any of LaJeunesse’s allegations about specific complaints he raised, but said Google “rigorously” investigates allegations of discrimination and misconduct.

“Discussions that make anyone feel like they don’t belong have no place at Google and we absolutely want to hear about and address any concerns,” the spokeswoman said. “All instances of inappropriate conduct reported to us are investigated rigorously, and over the past year we have simplified how employees can raise concerns and provided more transparency into the investigations process.” 

It’s only the latest in a string of complaints from a former employees who say Google has retaliated against workers after they raised concerns about minority mistreatment within the company. In December, a group of four Google workers filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board alleging they were fired for participating in legally protected labor organizing, including efforts to defend colleagues who faced pushback from management when they brought up instances of discrimination. 

At the end of last year, Google also fired a transgender engineer who created a pop-up notification that automatically notified her coworkers about their labor rights.  

Google has claimed those employees were fired for violating company policies. 

The company offered LaJeunesse another job after it reorganized the policy team last year, but he claims the position was a clear demotion intended to “buy my silence.” 

Now, he is running for Collins’s position in Maine. In an interview, he compared Collins, a vulnerable GOP senator with a raft of primary challengers, to Google, claiming both represent “abuses of power” in his mind. 

“I’m not running as a way of getting back at Google,” he said. “Google markets itself as a company you can believe in and trust. People do. Why I decided this story needs to be told is because I think that was true at one point — but it’s not true anymore.” 

Click Here: Ireland Rugby Shop

More than 200 lawmakers urge Supreme Court to 'reconsider' Roe v. Wade

More than 200 members of Congress want the Supreme Court to “reconsider” the landmark abortion case Roe v. Wade

Led by Minority Whip Steve ScaliseStephen (Steve) Joseph ScaliseMore than 200 lawmakers urge Supreme Court to ‘reconsider’ Roe v. Wade Republicans, Democrats offer support after John Lewis cancer diagnosis Congressional leaders, 2020 hopefuls condemn anti-Semitic attack in New York MORE (R-La.), 166 House Republicans and 39 Senate Republicans signed an amicus brief calling the right to an abortion “unworkable.

Two Democrats, Rep. Collin PetersonCollin Clark PetersonMore than 200 lawmakers urge Supreme Court to ‘reconsider’ Roe v. Wade Gabbard says impeachment will only ’embolden’ Trump House GOP vows to use impeachment to cut into Democratic majority MORE (Minn.) and Rep. Daniel LipinskiDaniel William LipinskiDemocratic group to only endorse attorney general candidates who back abortion rights Democrats unveil impeachment procedures The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden camp faces new challenges MORE (Ill.), also signed onto the brief. Lipinski has come under fire for his anti-abortion stance, and is being targeted in his upcoming primary by a progressive Democrat. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“Forty-six years after Roe was decided, it remains a radically unsettled precedent,” the lawmakers wrote in an amicus brief.

The lawmakers noted the “unworkability” of the “right to abortion” found in Roe v. Wade, and suggested the court take up the issue of whether the case should be reconsidered and, if appropriate, overruled.

The lawmakers were writing in support of a Louisiana law that would require doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital, a requirement that critics say is designed to force abortion clinics to close.

The Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments challenging the law in March. If upheld, the restrictions could leave the state with just one abortion provider.

The amicus brief is likely to give new ammunition to opponents of the law, who argue that the case represents a direct challenge to Roe, even though Louisiana itself did not ask the court to formally overturn Roe.

ADVERTISEMENT

It will be the first abortion case taken up by the Supreme Court since President TrumpDonald John TrumpIran foreign minister warns killing of general is ‘extremely dangerous and foolish escalation’ Congress reacts to U.S. assassination of Iranian general Trump tweets American flag amid reports of strike against Iranian general MORE‘s two nominees — Justices Neil GorsuchNeil GorsuchMore than 200 lawmakers urge Supreme Court to ‘reconsider’ Roe v. Wade The 7 big Supreme Court cases to watch in 2020 Removal of DACA recipients has begun: It didn’t take a crystal ball to see DACA would not end well MORE and Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughMore than 200 lawmakers urge Supreme Court to ‘reconsider’ Roe v. Wade Ten senators to watch on Trump impeachment trial The 7 big Supreme Court cases to watch in 2020 MORE — were confirmed to the bench.

In the amicus brief filed in support of the state, the lawmakers argued that the abortion clinic in question, June Medical Services, lacks the standing to argue on behalf of its patients. The lawmakers also said abortion clinics, including June Medical, have a long history of health and safety violations.

The state has argued that admitting privileges are necessary in order to protect the health and safety of patients.

In challenging the state’s regulations, the lawmakers wrote, abortion providers are not interested in the safety of their patients, and thus lack standing.

“There is an inherent conflict of interest between abortion providers and their patients,” they wrote. “It is impossible for abortion clinics and doctors to share or represent the interests of their patients when they seek to eliminate the very regulations designed to protect their patients’ health and safety.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Supreme Court in 2016 struck down an almost identical law in Texas because it resulted in the closure of half of the state’s abortion clinics, which would place an “undue burden” on women seeking a legal abortion.

But the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in Texas, considered to be one of the most conservative courts in the country, upheld the Louisiana restrictions in a 2-1 decision, finding that it was “remarkably different” than the Texas law. 

The court found there was “no evidence” any abortion clinics would close under the Louisiana law because it was easier for doctors to obtain admitting privileges in the state.  

Trump urges Iraqi PM to protect US personnel after protesters storm embassy

President TrumpDonald John TrumpGiuliani says he would be willing to testify in impeachment trial Trump expected to announce limited vaping ban this week Linda Ronstadt: Trump is ‘like Hitler, and the Mexicans are the new Jews’ MORE on Tuesday spoke with Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abd al-Mahdi about the safety of American personnel at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

The White House said Trump and al-Mahdi discussed “regional security issues” and that the president “emphasized the need to protect United States personnel and facilities in Iraq.”

Trump is in Florida spending the holidays at his Mar-a-Lago resort. He spent just under an hour at his golf club in West Palm Beach on Tuesday where he said he had a meeting on the Middle East and the military.

ADVERTISEMENT

The call came hours after thousands of demonstrators and supporters of an Iran-backed militia stormed the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. Some chanted “Death to America” and set small fires inside the walls of the compound.

Iraqi security forces reportedly did not intervene to stop the demonstrators from advancing until a commander arrived and gave them orders. 

The protests were triggered by U.S. airstrikes on Sunday against five Kataib Hezbollah targets in Iraq and Syria that killed at least 25 militia fighters. The airstrikes came in response to an attack that killed a U.S. contractor and wounded four U.S. service members.

The Trump administration blamed the Kataib Hezbollah militia, which is backed by Iran, for the attack.

Defense Secretary Mark EsperMark EsperEsper says 750 troops to deploy ‘immediately’ in response to violent embassy protests in Iraq US readies 4,000 troops for deployment to Middle East amid Baghdad unrest: report Trump urges Iraqi PM to protect US personnel after protesters storm embassy MORE said additional U.S. forces would be deployed to the facility in Baghdad to bolster security, and he called on Iraq to assist in the protection of embassy personnel.

The chaos at the embassy has renewed concerns among some U.S. lawmakers about the potential for conflict with Iran.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiSenate Republican predicts impeachment trial ends by State of the Union Trump threatens Iran over embassy incident, which he calls the ‘Anti-Benghazi’ Trump urges Iraqi PM to protect US personnel after protesters storm embassy MORE (D-Calif.) tweeted that embassy personnel “deserve protection from the Iraqi host government and smart, strong national security strategy from U.S. leaders. Escalation and violence must end.”

The Trump administration has made confronting Tehran a cornerstone of its foreign policy and has hammered its leaders with sanctions over the past year.

The two countries have also been on the brink of conflict at times, including after Trump said in June he called off a military strike at the last moment after the U.S. accused Iran of shooting down an American drone.

Recession tops list of CEOs' economic concerns

American CEOs are most worried about a recession as the new year begins, according to the latest survey by The Conference Board.

Economic decline topped the list of concerns for American chief executives heading into a crucial election year, compared with 12 months ago when recession was only third on their list of worries.

One reason for the growing concern, according to the survey, is the decrease in global gross domestic product (GDP).

ADVERTISEMENT

“The ongoing concerns about recession risk among business leaders reflect the slowing economy of the past year and the uncertainties about the outcome of the trade disputes and other policy concerns,” Bart van Ark, The Conference Board’s chief economist, said in a statement.

Global GDP slowed to 2.3 percent in 2019, from 3 percent the previous year.

“However, given a slightly better outlook for the global economy and an easing of trade tensions, we anticipate that a drumbeat of negative sentiment — which can become a self-fulling prophecy — can be avoided, and that we will see more confidence about business prospects in 2020,” van Ark added.

The Trump administration is slated to sign the first phase of a trade deal with China later this month, a sign of progress in a trade war between the world’s two largest economies that began in July 2018.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpIran foreign minister warns killing of general is ‘extremely dangerous and foolish escalation’ Congress reacts to U.S. assassination of Iranian general Trump tweets American flag amid reports of strike against Iranian general MORE has repeatedly highlighted U.S. stock market gains and the strength of the economy as part of his reelection campaign. Financial markets reached record highs in 2019 and the unemployment rate has remained near a 50-year low.

The second-biggest concern for American CEOs, according to the Conference Board survey, was “more intense competition,” followed by a “tight labor market.”

“Global political instability” and “uncertainty about global trade” tied for fourth.

The research group projects that global GDP will expand 2.5 percent in 2020. A survey of global CEOs also ranked “recession risk” as their top concern.

Click Here: WORLD CUP Rugby Shop

Conservatives ask judge to force purge of 200,000 voters in Wisconsin

A conservative law firm in Wisconsin asked a judge Thursday to find the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) in contempt and fine its members $2,000 a day until the commission purges more than 200,000 voters from the rolls.

At issue is the status of voters who may have moved addresses and did not respond within 30 days to a confirmation notice sent by the election panel, The Associated Press reports.

The commission mailed approximately 232,500 voters to tell them records indicated a change in address and that they needed to verify the address where they were registered to vote. However, a large majority of voters didn’t respond to the inquiry — 209,000 voters didn’t request continuation at their current address or seek to register at another one, according to the AP.

ADVERTISEMENT

In December, a judge ordered the commission to purge those voters. But the bipartisan WEC is appealing the judge’s order and has not carried out the purge while the matter is being litigated in the courts.

Conservatives say the courts should force the election commission to act now.

“Court orders are not suggestions,” Rick Esenberg, head of the conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, which is seeking the action, said on local station WISN-AM. “They are not rendered inoperative by the fact that you filed an appeal.”

Esenberg and the law firm say the voter purge should happen immediately since the judge previously ruled that the WEC was breaking state law by not carrying out the purge.

Democratic groups are fighting the order. According to the AP, most of the voters who would be affected in a purge are from areas that are mostly Democratic. The action would have high stakes for the 2020 election: Wisconsin, a perennial battleground state, was won by President TrumpDonald John TrumpIran foreign minister warns killing of general is ‘extremely dangerous and foolish escalation’ Congress reacts to U.S. assassination of Iranian general Trump tweets American flag amid reports of strike against Iranian general MORE in 2016 by fewer than 23,000 votes.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty has asked the Wisconsin Supreme Court to directly take up the appeal.

Netanyahu to seek parliamentary immunity in corruption cases

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin NetanyahuBenjamin (Bibi) NetanyahuMORE announced Wednesday that he will seek parliamentary immunity in three corruption cases.

Netanyahu claims he deserves parliament’s protection because the charges are politically motivated. The trial cannot begin once an immunity request is announced, so the proceedings could be delayed for months, Reuters reported.  

The prime minister’s announcement was made four hours before his deadline for an application was set to expire.

Reuters notes that the parliament is not expected to back Netanyahu’s request with a majority of votes before the March 2 election. The prime minister has strived to get majority support in parliament to form a government after elections, but failed to do so in April and September. 

Netanyahu was charged with bribery, fraud and breach of trust for exchanging state favors to media barons for gifts and positive news coverage, making history as the first current leader of Israel to face criminal charges. 

The prime minister maintains he did nothing wrong and says the media and left are using this to try to remove him as the leader.

EPA's independent science board says agency ignored its advice on mercury rule

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) independent board of science advisers took the agency to task Tuesday for ignoring its advice and when revising Obama-era protections for mercury pollution from power plants.

In a draft released by the EPA’s Science Advisory Board (SAB), members say their recommendations “do not seem to have been taken into consideration in the published analysis.”

Under the Obama administration, the EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) rule was projected to save between $37 billion and $90 billion dollars when taking into account savings on public health. Under the Trump administration’s proposal, the estimate has been reduced to between $4 million to $6 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is at least the second time the proposal has been criticized this month. Economists criticized the cost-benefit analysis used by the EPA to justify the changes in the rule, saying the flawed analysis essentially zeros out “co-benefits,” including the other toxins that would be removed by pollution controls at power plants that would ultimately benefit public health.

The review by the SAB lists a number of scientific studies that back up the critique of economists, arguing the EPA failed to consider the wide health benefits that would result from better controlling mercury pollution and underestimated the neurological damage that comes from being exposed to it.

The SAB also digs into the EPA’s analysis on how families might be exposed to mercury from freshwater fish, arguing the EPA needs to include all types of fish and consider how bioaccumulation of mercury would impact all ages. 

An EPA spokesperson stressed the feedback was only a draft.

“EPA always appreciates and respects the work and advice of the SAB. The reports they posted are a draft and will be discussed at their next meeting. The commentary and reports may potentially be revised by the SAB members as they strive for a consensus on these documents. The final commentary and reports will be developed soon after the public meeting and then sent to the administrator,” a spokesperson said by email.

The latest EPA MATS proposal doesn’t roll back the rule itself, but changing the cost-benefit analysis associated with it would open up the agency to swift legal challenges, something critics worry could hinder future administrations from using the full power of the Clean Air Act.

DHS to review state laws granting driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants

Acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad WolfChad WolfDHS to review state laws granting driver’s licenses to undocumented immigrants Rapid turnover shapes Trump’s government House Homeland Security rip DHS’s ‘unacceptable’ failure to comply with subpoena MORE on Tuesday called for a departmentwide study of how recent state laws allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses impact federal enforcement capabilities, according to The Associated Press.

Wolf’s memo, which went to agencies including U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Transportation Security Administration, follows a New York law authorizing licenses for undocumented immigrants and restricting data sharing with federal agencies. Similar laws exist in a dozen other states, including New Jersey, which passed a similar measure in December.

Wolf wrote in his memo that the department needed to be “prepared to deal with and counter these impacts as we protect the homeland.” He also asked each recipient to take account of what Department of Motor Vehicles information is already available and of any security consequences their operations could risk without that data, according to the AP.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The Trump administration takes the mission of protecting the Homeland very seriously,” DHS spokeswoman Heather Swift told the AP, adding that these types of laws “make it easier for terrorists and criminals to obtain fraudulent documents.”

Approximately 265,000 immigrants in the Empire State, the majority in New York City, are projected to seek licenses under the new law over the next three years, according to the AP, citing research from the Fiscal Policy Institute.

The law still requires applicants to obtain permits and pass road tests. Authorities in states with such laws argue that they will improve traffic safety by reducing the number of uninsured people on the road.

Highlights of 2019

Here are some thoughts to wrap up the year of style, fashion, retail, entertainment and beyond. These are subjective musings, so feel free to agree, disagree, and add to my list. It’s all in good fun. 

Personal Highlight of the Year: We moved to a loft apartment by Seattle’s waterfront and LOVE our new neighbourhood and urban walking lifestyle. Our storage spaces in the loft are not ideal and we plan to remodel eventually, but I had fun organizing my wardrobe and making the puzzle pieces fit. My bags have pride of place, and my colourful wardrobe makes me smile.

Fashion Highlight: Birthday shopping with in-house fashion stylist and hubs, Greg. I’m treated like royalty, spoiled rotten, and I enjoy every second of quality time with my sweetie.

Sale of the Year: Nordstrom Anniversary sale. I always have a good sale, but this year was exceptional. I bought a few statement pieces and a fun wildcard, all of which have become wardrobe workhorses.

Seattle’s Best Rainbow Hair: Sam’s blue locks.

Best YLF Flashback: Benetton in the ‘80s.

Best “Finally” Moments in the Fashion Industry:

  • The availability of extended size assortments at many retailers.
  • A more diverse set of models.
  • Signs of a commitment to making more sustainable choices.

Favourite Red Carpet Outfit: Serena William’s floral citron gown complete with matching Nike hi-tops. 

Most Overstocked Items at Retail: Skinnies, cropped pants, oversized tops, Athleisure, workout wear.

Favourite New-to-me Outfit Bloggers: Susanne from Texterella, and Hayley Hall.

Most Stylish Quotes: Both are from Alison at Wardrobe Oxygen:

  • “Your weight does not determine your worth”
  • “Your size does not determine your strength”

Fashion and Style Buzzwords: Sustainability, Gender Fluidity, the ‘80s, the ‘90s, Diversity, and Conscious Consumption.

Best Instagram Hashtag: #makemysize

Most Improved Retailers: Banana Republic and Macy’s.

Banana Republic’s quality seems to be back on track, and I’m especially impressed with their online Japan Exclusive collection. My favourite new Summer slim wide cropped checked pants are from that assortment, and now I’m hooked.

Macy’s has cleaned up their act. Their site is working better, stores are more organized, customer service has improved, and there are more discounts. Most importantly, their ONLINE dress assortment is one of the best if you’re looking for no-nonsense, flattering, fun and affordable frocks across extended sizes and colours. Big shout out to Ralph Lauren, DKNY and Calvin Klein dresses.

Best Customer Service: Zappos, Nordstrom, Everlane, Boden.

Fastest Shipping: Amazon

Best Fashion Show: The Colours of Africa Fashion Show at Vienna Fashion Week.

Best Trends: The ones that make you feel happy and fabulous, and that you’ll continue wearing after they’ve had their fashion moment. For me that’s DYOT (Do Your Own Thing) and wearing fashion sneakers with everything.

Worst Trend: The ones that boss you around and don’t get your style or your body.

Wardrobe Items of the Year: Pants and Jeans. The assortment at retail this year was stellar.

Worst Universal Fit Challenges: Necklines that are too low, dress lengths that are too short, armholes that are too wide, and sleeves that are too narrow.

Favourite New Beauty Product: LilyAna Naturals Retinol Cream.

Best Wardrobe Wild Card: My Apple watch. I gave this a lot of thought because wearing a casual sporty watch daily is not my cup of tea. After figuring out that I could customize a white face, and match the white strap with gold hardware with my pearls, I was in business. I LOVE my Apple watch because of what it can do. It’s perfectly in sync with my iPhone, which has a matching white silicone case. I’m more of a techie than I thought.

Best Early Morning Adventure: Greg, Sam and I got up just before 2am to watch the World Cup Rugby Final between England and South Africa live from Seattle. OF COURSE, we were cheering for South Africa who has won the World Cup twice before. We had an extremely festive and fun time WhatsApp’ing with our South African friends across the globe during the match, which ended in a glorious victory for South Africa. Full of adrenalin after the spectacular win, we couldn’t go back to sleep!

Worst Weather of the Year: Seattle Snowmageddon. Back in February, the city was hit with record snow storms that ground things to a halt. Seattle looked like an Alpine ski resort for a month. It was treacherous because hilly Seattle isn’t geared up for this type of snow and ice. Snowmageddon had its fun moments, but I was relieved to see it all wash away with our usual Winter rain.

Most Dapper 87 Year old: My sweet and gentle Papa.

Colour of the Year: Bright red for the second year in row.

Best Dutch Clothing Brands: Scotch & Soda because of their commitment to quality, unique looks, and the relaxed edge they bring to dressy clothing. G-Star because their men’s outerwear is hip, flattering, practical and beautifully made. Sylver because they had the best Winter polka dot scarves this year.

Footwear Brand of the Year: Ecco because their fashion sneakers finally fit my low volume feet, and I bought five pairs. I wear them all the time, and with everything.

Biggest Style Surprise: Lengths are my thing, and I will absolutely split hairs about them. I adore the look of full-length flared bottoms that skim the surface of the ground because it’s forever flattering, luxurious, and gorgeous to my eye. But the sky must be falling because I’ve surprised myself by ALSO loving the new shorter full length with flats. It’s a lot more practical for my wet climate and urban walking lifestyle. It’s a fab look with flat booties and sneakers (my go-to footwear). It’s also playful, trendy, a little preppy, and above all — I’m having fun sporting the change.

Most Popular YLF Blog Posts:

  • Feeling Empowered at 49
  • Your Word and Colour for 2019
  • My Tribute to Tuppy
  • Team Black or Team Dark Blue
  • The Reality of Aging
  • Nordstrom, Remember Your Roots

Most Annoying Retail Styling Technique: Bare ankles for Fall and Winter fashion, obsessive tucking and semi-tucking of tops, and models with awfully messy hair.

Biggest Missed Opportunities at Retail: Tops that look fabulous UN-tucked with a bit of shape and personality. Tops with interesting sleeves that can be easily layered under toppers. Fabulous and good quality essentials made is all sizes. White tops that aren’t see-through. Machine washable casual dresses that are knee-covering, sleeved, fit well, and made of fab fabric.

Best Thoughts on Ethical Consumerism: An article in Vogue by Maya Singer.

Worst Quality Problems: Knitwear that pills, and garments made of shoddy fabric.

Accessory of the Year: Beanies. Everybody wears them in my neck of the woods, and so do I.

Favourite TV Show: Chernobyl

Favourite Documentary: Oasis: Supersonic. Greg and I were absolutely captivated. So much so that we watched it once, and all over again twelve hours later. The music, storyline, characters, editing and spontaneous photography are sublime. You might want to watch it with closed captions because a strong Manchester accent can be tricky to understand.

Most Fun Movie of the Year: Alita: Battle Angel

Best Dark Movie of the Year: Joker.

Best Movies for Style & Fashion: Downton Abbey, and Once Upon a Time in Hollywood

Best TV Show About Positive Body Image: Shrill.

Favourite Ways to Accumulate Steps: Shopping, traveling, and going on long walks with Greg and Sam.

Biggest Bang for Your Fashion Buck: Wearing the heck out of your wardrobe and feeling fabulous in it.

Favourite Style Tips: Be patient with your style, listen to how you feel in an outfit, don’t compare and despair, and never stop having fun with fashion.

We at YLF wish you a happy, safe and peaceful New Year’s Eve.

Click Here: thierry mugler angel

Outfit Formula: Simple Long Black Puffer

In Winter the long black puffer coat is ubiquitous across most of the globe. In Seattle, it’s by far the most worn item of outerwear on the street. Heck, even I have a long black puffer and I barely wear black. 

Custom Findby Angie

 It’s a ten year old Soia & Kyo that’s in mint condition. I bought a navy Soia & Kyo update four years ago and wear that instead. But I keep the long black puffer around for just in case because it’s beautifully made and a very practical piece.

These simple outfit formulas are for Team Long Black Puffer and Team Neutral. Each outfit is just a little different from the oh-so-popular outfit formula that combines blue jeans with a black or grey top, black boots, and black puffer.

1. Grey Jeans & White Boots

Think grey jeans instead of blue jeans, and white boots instead of black. Finish things off with a white, grey or black pullover, and top it off with a long black puffer coat. Light coloured grey or off-white snow boots would work as well.

2. Contrast Faux Fur Trim

The contrast faux fur trim on this head-to-toe black outfit breaks things up, adds a bit of glam, and softens the palette. Could be nice to add a pullover, gloves, or boots in a similar colour to the faux fur trim to pull together the look.

3. Patent and Contrast Lining

Patent black puffers are quite dramatic, and this one has a lovely olive lining that breaks up the black and adds a softness to the hard edged black patent. This type of olive green lining can pick up the green in your eyes, or the green in the pattern of a pattered pullover or scarf. I like how it was combined with an animal print top, and bookended with black boots. Nice to see bootcuts in the mix.

Click Here: thierry mugler angel

4. Matchy-Matchy Sweater and Socks

This version isn’t completely neutral, but you can make it neutral if you like. The fun component here is how the visible socks match the pullover. Both are Fair Isle and within the same palette. The black puffer has a lot of brown trim which breaks things up, but a solid black puffer would be equally fab. Puffers with faux fur trim add textural interest, and Dr. Martens are always in style. Add jewellery, head gear, watch, and scarves as desired.