China Rebukes House Bill Condemning Crackdown On Uighurs

China has responded with swift condemnation after the U.S. Congress overwhelmingly approved a bill targeting its mass crackdown on ethnic Muslim minorities. The bill decries what China describes as educational centers and the U.S. says are detention facilities.

Chinese officials have expressed outrage after the House passed a bill late Tuesday condemning Beijing’s crackdown on China’s Muslim Uighur minority.

The bipartisan bill, which passed the House in a 407-1 vote, condemns “gross human rights violations” against the Uighurs and calls for “an end to arbitrary detention, torture, and harassment of these communities inside and outside China.”

Beijing has long vociferously objected to any perceived interference in its internal affairs, particularly in sensitive regions such as Tibet and Xinjiang, a restive region in China’s west where the vast majority of the Uighurs live.

“The U.S. attempts to sow discord among various ethnic groups in China … and contain China’s growth,” Hua Chunying, a spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry, said in a statement. “But its attempt will never succeed.”

The bill, which now goes to the Senate where passage seems certain, could further complicate movement toward a deal with China to end the ongoing trade war with Washington.

It comes close on the heels of yet another bipartisan measure, signed by President Trump last week, that supports Hong Kong’s five-month-old pro-democracy movement and requires the State Department to conduct an annual review to ensure that the territory’s autonomous political structure is maintained as a condition for continuing favorable U.S.-China trade relations.

That law, which also allows the U.S. to impose sanctions on people responsible for human rights violations in Hong Kong, was likewise sharply rebuked by Chinese authorities.

The measure passed Tuesday states that since 2014, Chinese authorities have detained some 800,000 Uighurs and other ethnic minorities and subjected them to brutal conditions.

It also calls on President Trump to take action to sanction senior Chinese officials involved in the abuses in Xinjiang. The measure also calls for imposing export restrictions on technologies used to surveil the minority populations.

On Wednesday, Trump stated that the ongoing tense trade discussions with China are “going very well,” according to Reuters.

But a Chinese government spokesperson suggested that the bill could jeopardize any agreement.

“Do you think if America takes actions to hurt China’s interests we won’t take any action?” Hua Chunying answered when she was asked about the bill’s impact on a possible trade deal, Reuters reported. “I think any wrong words and deeds must pay the due price.”

After the latest measure passed last night, Hua stated that it “deliberately smears the human rights condition in Xinjiang, slanders China’s efforts in deradicalization and counterterrorism and viciously attacks the Chinese government’s Xinjiang policy.”

Beijing has denied maintaining a vast network of detention centers in the region designed to house political dissidents, describing them instead as educational centers. “Trainees take courses that prepare them to succeed under local employment conditions,” the Chinese Embassy in the U.S. said in a tweet on Tuesday.

NPR’s Rob Schmitz recently visited the camps and heard a different story from detainees.

“They said they were more like political indoctrination camps where inmates were forced to repeat communist slogans and had to attend classes that taught them their religious traditions were backwards and harmful,” Schmitz reported. Detainees told him they were constantly hungry and that it wasn’t clear whether they could leave, as China claims they can.

Click Here: chanel perfume sale

The lone vote against the Uighur bill passed Tuesday was from Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky. “When our government meddles in the internal affairs of foreign countries, it invites those governments to meddle in our affairs,” he wrote on Twitter in a message explaining his vote.

The White House has not signaled whether the president will sign the bill. The Senate passed a similar measure in September. Sen. Marco Rubio, a sponsor of the bill, said, “I look forward to working with my Senate colleagues to get it passed and sent to the President for enactment.”

Uighur advocates are applauding the move. “Tonight’s action gives Uyghurs hope,” Omer Kanat, the executive director of Uyghur Human Rights Project, said in a statement. “This action by the U.S. Congress paves the way for other countries to act.”

Giuliani, Nunes and ‘-1’: A Look At What The Impeachment Report Phone Records Mean

Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., stands in an elevator after departing a secure area of the Capitol on Dec. 3. His appearance in call logs in the Democrats’ impeachment report is raising new questions about his role in the Ukraine pressure campaign at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.

The story of the House Democrats’ impeachment report has quickly become all about the phone records.

The majority Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee on Tuesday released a 300-page report detailing the evidence it has accumulated in its impeachment inquiry into President Trump.

While most of the report’s findings were already publicly known, House investigators cited a series of newly disclosed telephone records that have set off new scrutiny and questions about key players in the Ukraine affair.

The records are call logs provided to House investigators by AT&T that do not reveal what was said but do show who called whom and for how long.

House Democrats view the phone records as a way to connect the dots among some of the key allegations in what the report describes as a monthlong effort by Trump and his allies to abuse the power of his office to solicit foreign interference in the 2020 election.

Here’s a breakdown of the biggest players implicated in the call logs and why they are so significant.

Rudy Giuliani, former New York City mayor and current lawyer for President Trump, whose actions are at the center of the impeachment inquiry into Trump.

Rudy Giuliani

The records show that Giuliani, Trump’s personal lawyer, was in frequent contact with the White House; Lev Parnas, a now-indicted Giuliani associate; Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee; and John Solomon, a former columnist for The Hill who led a smear campaign against former Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.

Solomon also pushed debunked theories about the Bidens and the 2016 election, including the false theory that Ukraine, not Russia, was responsible for 2016 election meddling, despite the U.S. intelligence community flatly denying this.

One of Giuliani’s calls on April 24 lasted 4 minutes and 53 seconds with a White House number. Later that day, Giuliani had three phone calls with a number associated with the Office of Management and Budget. That evening, the State Department rang up Yovanovitch and abruptly called her home because of “concerns” from “up the street.”

In fact, before Yovanovitch was recalled as ambassador, Giuliani had more than a dozen phone conversations with White House officials.

The calls cited in the report help illuminate just how central Giuliani’s direction was to the ouster of Yovanovitch and the bid to push Ukraine’s new president to announce criminal investigations into the Bidens, according to Bennett Gershman, a former prosecutor who now teaches law at Pace University.

“It shows real circumstantial evidence of just how wide and sprawling the coordinated effort was to dig up dirt on Biden,” Gershman told NPR. “And Giuliani is right at the hub.”

Rep. Devin Nunes

Nunes is one of Trump’s closest allies on Capitol Hill and a fierce critic of the impeachment inquiry.

The phone records indicate that Nunes and Giuliani were in touch regularly last April, just when Giuliani was working a foreign policy back channel to try to convince Ukraine to open an investigation into the Bidens.

Nunes also had a conversation with Parnas, the Giuliani associate who was helping in the effort to dig up dirt on the Bidens.

Democrats say they learned for the first time that Nunes had these contacts after they reviewed the phone logs.

House Democrats say Nunes should have disclosed to impeachment investigators that he had been in communication with Giuliani and Parnas.

Part of Nunes’ defense of the president involved discredited theories that were being peddled by Giuliani and Parnas, just as Nunes was apparently having phone chats with both of them.

Gershman, the Pace law professor and expert on government ethics, took it a step further, saying that Nunes should have recused himself from the impeachment inquiry altogether.

“Nunes’ calls are really a startling and critical development,” Gershman said. “We want to know, exactly, what was Nunes talking about? Why was he in conversation to Giuliani? Why was he in conversation with Parnas? There’s a lot of explaining needed here.”

On Fox News on Tuesday night, Nunes said that he did not deny that he had been in touch with Parnas but said he was skeptical about the phone records.

“It’s possible, but I haven’t gone through all my phone records. I don’t really recall that name. I remember that name now because he’s been indicted,” Nunes said. “I’ll go back and check all my records. It seems very unlikely that I’d be checking calls from random people.”

The mystery of “-1”

Just as Giuliani was mounting a pressure campaign to get Ukraine to open investigations into the Bidens, he had frequent contact with the White House Situation Room switchboard, the records show.

Some of Giuliani’s contact was with a mysterious “-1” phone number.

Democrats were not able to confirm the identity of the person associated with the number, but there is circumstantial evidence that it could be Trump. Rep. Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told The New York Times that it appears as if some of the calls with -1 involved Trump but that the committee is working “to find out definitively.”

Talking to reporters, Schiff said that the call records show “considerable coordination among the parties, including the White House” to remove Yovanovitch and extort Ukraine by conditioning $391 million in security assistance to the country to a politically beneficial investigation.

Gershman said getting to the bottom of who was on the other side of the -1 phone calls could prove to be critical.

“It could bring Trump not just deeply into this effort to extort Ukraine but could show he’s the director and producer and star of the show,” he said. “It could put Trump right at the head, the person leading this conspiracy.”

The phone records were presumably obtained through a subpoena issued by the Intelligence Committee, but the report never specifies how the logs were secured.

A spokesman for AT&T, Jim Greer, would not comment on the records, only saying the company complies with information requests from all law enforcement agencies.

“In all cases, we ensure that requests for assistance are valid and that we act in compliance with the law,” Greer said.

Click Here: thierry mugler angel

Supreme Court denies Trump request to immediately resume federal executions

The Supreme Court on Friday denied the Trump administration’s request to immediately lift a block on federal executions so that it could move forward with a death sentence that was scheduled to be carried out on Monday.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) had filed an emergency request with the court to vacate a stay of all four planned federal executions. A fifth execution has also been delayed for unrelated reasons.

The first was scheduled for Monday and the others were set to be carried out through December and January.

ADVERTISEMENT

A federal judge last month ordered a hold on federal executions while a separate legal challenge over the DOJ’s new lethal injection protocol plays out before an appeals court.

In a statement issued on Friday, conservative Justice Samuel AlitoSamuel AlitoSupreme Court denies Trump request to immediately resume federal executions Justices appear cautious of expanding gun rights in NY case The ACLU’s own Twitter feed shows what’s at stake when ‘sex’ is redefined MORE, joined by his colleagues Neil GorsuchNeil GorsuchSupreme Court denies Trump request to immediately resume federal executions House, Senate Democrats call on Supreme Court to block Louisiana abortion law Justices appear cautious of expanding gun rights in NY case MORE and Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughSupreme Court denies Trump request to immediately resume federal executions House, Senate Democrats call on Supreme Court to block Louisiana abortion law Justices appear cautious of expanding gun rights in NY case MORE, urged a quick resolution of that case.

“The Court has expressed the hope that the Court of Appeals will proceed with ‘appropriate dispatch,’ and I see no reason why the Court of Appeals should not be able to decide this case, one way or the other, within the next 60 days,” Alito said.

The federal government has not carried out a death sentence since 2003.

During the Obama administration, cases challenging the death penalty went dormant as the government found it increasingly difficult to supply the three-drug cocktail that it was using for lethal injections.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the Trump administration has been aggressive in its efforts to resume executions. In July, Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrSupreme Court denies Trump request to immediately resume federal executions Hillicon Valley: Pelosi works to remove legal protections for tech companies from USMCA | Treasury sanctions Russian group over 0 million hack | Facebook sues Chinese individuals for ad fraud | Huawei takes legal action against FCC Biden gets in testy exchange in Iowa: ‘You’re a damn liar’ MORE announced a new execution protocol that would utilize a single drug called pentobarbital.

“The Justice Department upholds the rule of law—and we owe it to the victims and their families to carry forward the sentence imposed by our justice system,” Barr said at the time.

Updated 7:45 p.m.

Iran releases American held since 2016 in prisoner exchange

The Trump administration on Saturday announced the release of Xiyue Wang, a Chinese-American graduate student detained in Iran since 2016, as part of a prisoner exchange with Tehran.

“After more than three years of being held prisoner in Iran, Xiyue Wang is returning to the United States,” President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump says he will ‘temporarily hold off’ on declaring Mexican drug cartels as terror organization House Judiciary Committee formally receives impeachment report Artist behind gold toilet offered to Trump sells banana duct-taped to a wall for 0,000 MORE said in a statement released by the White House.

“We thank our Swiss partners for their assistance in negotiating Mr. Wang’s release with Iran,” Trump continued. “The highest priority of the United States is the safety and well-being of its citizens. Freeing Americans held captive is of vital importance to my Administration, and we will continue to work hard to bring home all our citizens wrongfully held captive overseas.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The U.S. has for years pushed for the release of Wang, a Princeton University scholar who was charged with espionage and in 2017 sentenced to 10 years in prison. Americans officials denied that he was a spy.

Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoTrump says he will ‘temporarily hold off’ on declaring Mexican drug cartels as terror organization West Bank annexation would endanger Israel’s security House approves two-state resolution in implicit rebuke of Trump MORE said Saturday that Wang “has now been released and is on his way back to the United States.” He thanked the Swiss government “for facilitating the return of Mr. Wang” while saying “Tehran has been constructive in this matter.”

“We continue to call for the release of all U.S. citizens unjustly detained in Iran,” he added in a statement.

Wang was freed from the Evin Prison in Iran and flew on a Swiss government airplane from Tehran to Zurich and was met there by the State Department’s special envoy for Iran, Brian Hook, according to The New York Times.

The U.S. released Iranian scientist Masoud Soleimani in exchange for Wang. Soleimani was arrested last fall on charges of violating trade sanctions against Iran and was expected to be released from prison under a plea agreement.

“Glad that Professor Massoud Soleimani and Mr. Xiyue Wang will be joining their families shortly. Many thanks to all engaged, particularly the Swiss government,” Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif tweeted early Saturday.

Wang’s wife, Hua Qu, thanked those involved in securing her husband’s release.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our family is complete once again,” she said in a statement. “Our son Shaofan and I have waited three long years for this day and it’s hard to express in words how excited we are to be reunited with Xiyue. We are thankful to everyone who helped make this happen.”

Wang is a Chinese-born naturalized U.S. citizen whose wife and child are Chinese citizens. The Princeton graduate student traveled to Iran in 2016 to attend a Farsi language program before he was detained. His family and the university said they had not seen the indictment against him nor had they seen records from the trial or the verdict.

The prisoner swap comes amid broader tensions between Washington and Tehran over Iran’s nuclear program and as the Trump administration has threatened to increase penalties on the country in recent days over its bloody crackdown on protesters.

Hook had briefed reporters about Iran’s crackdown on Thursday, describing in graphic detail Iranian security forces firing on fleeing protesters with machine guns.

The U.S. believes that more than 1,000 people have been killed with victims as young as 13, Hook said. As many as 7,000 demonstrators have been detained following the protests triggered by a rapid rise in fuel prices last month.

The Trump administration said this week that the U.S. would pursue sanctions against two Iranian prisons for gross human rights violations.

Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-era nuclear deal with Iran but has sought to maintain a “maximum pressure campaign” on the country with economic sanctions.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said earlier this week that Tehran would negotiate with the U.S. “whenever the U.S. lifts the unfair sanctions.”

Updated: 7:40 a.m.

Overnight Energy: Pelosi vows bold action to counter 'existential' climate threat | Trump jokes new light bulbs don't make him look as good | 'Forever chemicals' measure pulled from defense bill

IT’S EXISTENTIAL: Democrats on Friday warned of the “existential threat” posed by climate change, hammering President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump says he will ‘temporarily hold off’ on declaring Mexican drug cartels as terror organization House Judiciary Committee formally receives impeachment report Artist behind gold toilet offered to Trump sells banana duct-taped to a wall for 0,000 MORE‘s inaction on the topic while vowing to move aggressively next year on legislation designed to tackle the global issue.

“The reality of the crisis has to be met with the actuality of action that we take,” Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiHouse Judiciary Committee formally receives impeachment report Overnight Energy: Pelosi vows bold action to counter ‘existential’ climate threat | Trump jokes new light bulbs don’t make him look as good | ‘Forever chemicals’ measure pulled from defense bill Overnight Health Care — Presented by Johnson & Johnson – House progressives may try to block vote on Pelosi drug bill | McConnell, Grassley at odds over Trump-backed drug pricing bill | Lawmakers close to deal on surprise medical bills MORE (D-Calif.) told reporters in the Capitol, calling it “the existential threat to this generation.”

Pelosi was joined by a group of Democrats who also participated this week in a climate summit in Madrid, where world leaders, scientists, businesses and environmental activists gathered for talks aimed at boosting the 2015 Paris climate accord, the Obama-era pact forged to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump has promised to pull the United States out of that landmark agreement, claiming it would threaten America’s economy. Pelosi and other congressional Democrats attended the Madrid summit in large part to reassure the other participants in the accord that Trump’s position is no indication the United States is abandoning the effort.

“The world was hungry for that,” said Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseOvernight Energy: Pelosi vows bold action to counter ‘existential’ climate threat | Trump jokes new light bulbs don’t make him look as good | ‘Forever chemicals’ measure pulled from defense bill Pelosi warns of ‘existential’ climate threat, vows bold action Republicans raise concerns over Trump pardoning service members MORE (D-R.I.), who was also on the trip.

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, delivered a similar message.

“It’s not only an issue of survival for species and for human beings, it is an issue that deals with the economics and the future generations of this country. And this visit reaffirms … the fact that we have a role — a principled role — in the fight against climate change,” Grijalva said.

He added that “the fact that this administration has chosen not to” is not “the will or the desire of the American people.”

Upon retaking the Speaker’s gavel this year, Pelosi created a special panel — the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis — to examine the threat posed by a warming planet and draft a report outlining remedies.

That report will be released next spring, said Rep. Kathy CastorKatherine (Kathy) Anne CastorOvernight Energy: Pelosi vows bold action to counter ‘existential’ climate threat | Trump jokes new light bulbs don’t make him look as good | ‘Forever chemicals’ measure pulled from defense bill Pelosi warns of ‘existential’ climate threat, vows bold action Overnight Energy: Pelosi vows to push for Paris climate goals | Senate confirms Brouillette to succeed Perry at Energy | EPA under attack from all sides over ethanol rule MORE (D-Fla.), who chairs the panel, and Democrats will move afterwards to transfer those recommendations into targeted legislation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re running out of time,” Castor said, lamenting the “leadership vacuum” in the White House.

That legislation is almost certainly dead on arrival in the Republican-controlled Senate, where Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellOvernight Energy: Pelosi vows bold action to counter ‘existential’ climate threat | Trump jokes new light bulbs don’t make him look as good | ‘Forever chemicals’ measure pulled from defense bill Overnight Health Care — Presented by Johnson & Johnson – House progressives may try to block vote on Pelosi drug bill | McConnell, Grassley at odds over Trump-backed drug pricing bill | Lawmakers close to deal on surprise medical bills GOP senators request interview with former DNC contractor to probe possible Ukraine ties MORE (R-Ky.) has long defended the coal and other fossil fuel industries from the imposition of tougher environmental standards.

Read more here.

 

TGIF! Welcome to Overnight Energy, The Hill’s roundup of the latest energy and environment news. 

Scheduling note. This is Miranda Green’s last day at The Hill and writing this newsletter. Wish her farewell and continue to follow her next steps out West at @mirandacgreen. Becca is off next week, and so too will be the newsletter. It will return Dec. 17.

Please send tips and comments to Rebecca Beitsch, rbeitsch@thehill.com. Follow her on Twitter: @rebeccabeitsch and @thehill.

CLICK HERE to subscribe to our newsletter.

 

BLAME THE LIGHTING: President Trump on Friday joked that White House staff will have to change out lightbulbs in a few rooms because the new bulb “gives you an orange look.”

“The new bulb is many times more expensive, and, I hate to say it, it doesn’t make you look as good,” Trump said during a White House meeting focused on deregulation efforts.

“Of course, being a vain person that’s very important to me,” he added, prompting laughter in the room. “It gives you an orange look. I don’t want an orange look. Has anyone noticed that?”

“So we’ll have to change those bulbs out at least a couple of rooms where I am in the White House,” Trump quipped.

The president has made similar remarks before in needling an Obama-era rule that imposed energy efficiency standards on lightbulbs.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump joked during a House Republican retreat in September that the products make him look orange. He quipped days before that during a campaign rally in North Carolina that he feels he looks better under incandescent lights.

The Trump administration in September finalized the reversal of the Obama administration’s efficiency standards on light bulbs. The new rule will eliminate the energy efficiency standards for half the bulbs on the market, which critics say will hasten the effects of climate change by increasing U.S. energy usage.

Read more on Trump’s remarks here.

 

PFAS SET BACK: Democratic-championed provisions in the annual defense policy bill that would regulate cancer-linked “forever chemicals” have been pulled from the final version of the bill, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee confirmed Friday.

Rep. Adam SmithDavid (Adam) Adam SmithWhite House, Congress near deal to give 12 weeks paid parental leave to all federal workers Overnight Energy: Pelosi vows bold action to counter ‘existential’ climate threat | Trump jokes new light bulbs don’t make him look as good | ‘Forever chemicals’ measure pulled from defense bill Overnight Defense: Suspect in Pensacola shooting identified as Saudi aviation student | Trump speaks with Saudi king after shooting | Esper denies considering 14K deployment to Mideast MORE (D-Wash.) told reporters that negotiations on the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) are all but done, with the conference report only needing to be printed before negotiators’ signatures are gathered.

Negotiations on the bill had been tripped up for months over issues including President Trump’s border wall and Space Force. In recent weeks, provisions regulating a class of chemicals known as PFAS, which have been leaching into the water supply near military sites, also emerged as a major stumbling block.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We did not get what we wanted on PFAS because the Republicans refused to give it to us,” Smith said. “I strongly support listing this is a toxic substance and letting EPA [the Environmental Protection Agency] go to work. That’s what the Republicans refused to do.”

Ultimately, Smith added, the issue falls outside the jurisdiction of the NDAA, which made Democrats’ stance harder to defend after Republicans said they would not sign the conference report with the language in the bill.

Read more here.

 

OUTSIDE THE BELTWAY: 

Cities are banning natural gas in new homes, citing climate change, CBS News reports.

Click Here: cheap rugby league jerseys

Officials say a gas explosion in an apartment block in Slovakia killed at least five, The Washington Post reports.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thousands gather for change climate protests in Madrid, BBC News reports.

 

ICYMI: Stories from Friday…

-Trump quips that new lights bulbs don’t make him look as good

-EPA to resume contract negotiations with employee union

-Zambia warns climate change has led to worst drought in a century

-House-passed ‘forever chemicals’ regulations pulled from defense bill

-Pelosi warns of ‘existential’ climate threat, vows bold action

-Climate protesters block DC streets, demand World Bank lead fossil fuel divestiture

Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East

President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrumps light 97th annual National Christmas Tree Trump to hold campaign rally in Michigan ‘Don’t mess with Mama’: Pelosi’s daughter tweets support following press conference comments MORE on Thursday left the door open to the U.S. sending more troops to the Middle East to confront what Pentagon officials have described as a growing threat from Iran.

While hosting a White House luncheon with all of the permanent representatives to the U.N. Security Council, Trump was asked if more troops would be sent to the Middle East following reports that the administration was considering sending an additional 14,000.

“There might be a threat and if there is a threat, it will be met very strongly. But we’ll be announcing whatever we may be doing — may or may not be doing,” Trump replied.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier on Thursday, a top Pentagon official said that the Trump administration could deploy more U.S. troops to the region to counter Tehran.

During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, undersecretary of Defense for Policy John Rood called a Wall Street Journal report that the administration was mulling another 14,000 troops “erroneous.”

But when pressed by Sens. Marsha BlackburnMarsha BlackburnOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East Pentagon official: ‘Possible’ more US troops could be deployed to Middle East MORE (R-Tenn.) and Josh HawleyJoshua (Josh) David HawleyOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trade deal talks expand as Congress debates tech legal shield Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East MORE (R-Mo.) on whether a deployment is under consideration, Rood said that “we are evaluating the threat situation and the secretary if he chooses to can make decisions to deploy additional forces based on what he’s observing there.”

“Based on what we’re seeing and our concerns about the threat picture, it is possible that we would need to adjust our force posture,” said Rood, the Pentagon’s No. 3 official. “And I think that would be a be prudent step depending on what we observe because our objective is to deter Iranian aggression, and deterrence is not static. It’s a very dynamic activity.”

Pentagon press secretary Alyssa Farah said in a statement later on Thursday that the Defense Department is “constantly evaluating the threat situation around the world and considering our options. We adjust our force posture and troop levels based on adversary action and the dynamic security situation.”

ADVERTISEMENT

She added that Defense Secretary Mark EsperMark EsperOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East Pentagon official: ‘Possible’ more US troops could be deployed to Middle East MORE spoke to Senate Armed Services Chairman James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East Pentagon official: ‘Possible’ more US troops could be deployed to Middle East MORE (R-Okla.) on Thursday morning “and reaffirmed that we are not considering sending 14,000 additional troops to the Middle East at this time.”

Sending that many additional troops would double the number of U.S. forces sent to the region since May in the face of what officials have described as heightening threats from Iran, including the downing of a U.S. drone in June.

Rood told reporters on Wednesday that there were indications that Iran may soon attack U.S. forces or interests in the Middle East.

“We do remain concerned about potential Iranian aggression,” Rood said.

“We also continue to see indications … potential Iranian aggression could occur.”

The United States has also blamed Iran for attacks over the summer on oil tankers in the Gulf, as well as an attack on two Saudi Arabian oil facilities. Iran has denied they were involved. 

Click Here: cheap rugby league jerseys

Report: Pompeo had secret meeting with GOP donors in London

Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoReport: Pompeo had secret meeting with GOP donors in London The shifting impeachment positions of Jonathan Turley The Hill’s Morning Report – Dem dilemma on articles of impeachment MORE met recently with a conservative group, including a few wealthy Republican donors, while in London, a meeting not on his official schedule, CNN reported Thursday.

Click Here: nrl shops

The news network obtained a copy of an invitation to the gathering and spoke with people who attended it. 

The meeting was hosted by the Hamilton Society and occurred at the hotel while Pompeo was staying while abroad for a NATO summit, CNN reported. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The people who attended the meeting were reportedly instructed to leave their phones outside so that Pompeo’s comments wouldn’t be recorded. 

“Everyone is right of center, so it was a safe space,” one person told CNN, adding that Pompeo was “very chatty, casual, and entertaining.”

The Hill has reached out to the State Department for comment on the reported meeting. 

It comes amid speculation that Pompeo could run for Senate in his home state of Kansas. Pompeo has repeatedly said that his focus is being Trump’s secretary of State when asked whether he would run for Senate, but does frequent interviews with local media there. 

 

 

 

 

Trump speaks with Saudi king after Pensacola shooting

President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump says he will ‘temporarily hold off’ on declaring Mexican drug cartels as terror organization House Judiciary Committee formally receives impeachment report Artist behind gold toilet offered to Trump sells banana duct-taped to a wall for 0,000 MORE on Friday said he spoke with King Salman of Saudi Arabia after U.S. officials said that a Saudi national was suspected of opening fire at a naval air station in Pensacola, Fla., killing three people and injuring several others.

“The King said that the Saudi people are greatly angered by the barbaric actions of the shooter, and that this person in no way shape or form represents the feelings of the Saudi people who love the American people,” Trump tweeted.

The Saudi leader expressed his condolences to the families of those killed in the shooting, Trump said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a horrible thing that took place, and we’re getting to the bottom of it,” Trump said of the shooting during an event focused on deregulation.

The president would not say whether he believed the incident was an act of terrorism.

Officials said the gunman was a member of the Saudi Air Force, and they are investigating whether the shooting at the naval base was terrorism related. The gunman, who has not been publicly identified, was killed by law enforcement responding to the scene.

The base’s commanding officer said the suspect was training in aviation.

Rep. Matt GaetzMatthew (Matt) GaetzGiuliani draws attention with latest trip to Ukraine Overnight Defense: Suspect in Pensacola shooting identified as Saudi aviation student | Trump speaks with Saudi king after shooting | Esper denies considering 14K deployment to Mideast Trump speaks with Saudi king after Pensacola shooting MORE (R-Fla.), who represents Pensacola, said in a video posted on social media that U.S. allies around the world often go to the base to train, but said Friday’s incident demonstrates a “serious failure in the vetting process.”

The Pensacola shooting was the second fatal incident at a Naval base this week. A U.S. sailor killed two shipyard workers on Wednesday before killing himself.

ADVERTISEMENT

Click Here: nrl shops

Trump has had a complicated relationship with Saudi Arabia. He came under bipartisan criticism last year for his response to the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

The president echoed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman’s denials of involvement in Khashoggi’s death and argued the economic relationship between the two countries was critical. The Trump administration ultimately sanctioned several individuals involved in the murder, but did not target the crown prince.

The CIA later concluded the crown prince likely ordered Khashoggi’s killing.

Morgan Chalfant contributed.

Overnight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty

Happy Thursday and welcome to Overnight Defense. I’m Ellen Mitchell, and here’s your nightly guide to the latest developments at the Pentagon, on Capitol Hill and beyond. CLICK HERE to subscribe to the newsletter.

THE TOPLINE: President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrumps light 97th annual National Christmas Tree Trump to hold campaign rally in Michigan ‘Don’t mess with Mama’: Pelosi’s daughter tweets support following press conference comments MORE on Thursday left the door open to the U.S. sending more troops to the Middle East to confront what Pentagon officials have described as a growing threat from Iran.

While hosting a White House luncheon with all of the permanent representatives to the U.N. Security Council, Trump was asked if more troops would be sent to the Middle East following reports that the administration was considering sending an additional 14,000.

“There might be a threat and if there is a threat, it will be met very strongly,” Trump replied. “But we’ll be announcing whatever we may be doing — may or may not be doing.”

Earlier: Earlier on Thursday, a top Pentagon official said that the Trump administration could deploy more U.S. troops to the region to counter Tehran.

During a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, undersecretary of Defense for Policy John Rood called a Wall Street Journal report that the administration was mulling another 14,000 troops “erroneous.”

But when pressed by Sens. Marsha BlackburnMarsha BlackburnOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East Pentagon official: ‘Possible’ more US troops could be deployed to Middle East MORE (R-Tenn.) and Josh HawleyJoshua (Josh) David HawleyOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trade deal talks expand as Congress debates tech legal shield Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East MORE (R-Mo.) on whether a deployment is under consideration, Rood said that “we are evaluating the threat situation and the secretary if he chooses to can make decisions to deploy additional forces based on what he’s observing there.

“Based on what we’re seeing and our concerns about the threat picture, it is possible that we would need to adjust our force posture,” added Rood, the Pentagon’s No. 3 official. “And I think that would be a be prudent step depending on what we observe because our objective is to deter Iranian aggression, and deterrence is not static. It’s a very dynamic activity.”

The Pentagon’s response: Pentagon press secretary Alyssa Farah said in a statement later on Thursday that the Defense Department is “constantly evaluating the threat situation around the world and considering our options. We adjust our force posture and troop levels based on adversary action and the dynamic security situation.”

She added that Defense Secretary Mark EsperMark EsperOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East Pentagon official: ‘Possible’ more US troops could be deployed to Middle East MORE spoke to Senate Armed Services Chairman James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East Pentagon official: ‘Possible’ more US troops could be deployed to Middle East MORE (R-Okla.) on Thursday morning “and reaffirmed that we are not considering sending 14,000 additional troops to the Middle East at this time.”

Doubling the numbers: Sending that many additional troops would double the number of U.S. forces sent to the region since May in the face of what officials have described as heightening threats from Iran, including the downing of a U.S. drone in June.

Rood told reporters on Wednesday that there were indications that Iran may soon attack U.S. forces or interests in the Middle East.

“We do remain concerned about potential Iranian aggression,” Rood said.

“We also continue to see indications … potential Iranian aggression could occur.”

The United States has also blamed Iran for attacks over the summer on oil tankers in the Gulf, as well as an attack on two Saudi Arabian oil facilities. Iran has denied they were involved. 

PUTIN OFFERS IMMEDIATE EXTENSION OF KEY NUCLEAR TREATY: Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trump’s antics shouldn’t overshadow what he has accomplished in NATO MORE has offered to extend a key nuclear treaty with the United States immediately without preconditions, he said Thursday.

“Russia is ready to extend the New START treaty immediately, before the year’s end and without any preconditions,” Putin said at a meeting of military officials, according to The Associated Press.

“Our proposals have been on the table, but we have got no response from our partners,” Putin added.

 

About the treaty: The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START), negotiated by the Obama administration, caps the number of nuclear warheads the United States and Russia can deploy. It is the last major treaty constraining the U.S. and Russian nuclear arsenals following the collapse of the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) earlier this year.

New START is up for renewal in 2021, and it can be extended by mutual agreement without any further action.

The Trump administration has indicated it wants to expand the scope of the treaty as a condition of extension by taking steps such as folding in China and new weapons not currently covered by the agreement.

Earlier this week: While in London for a NATO summit this week, President Trump was upbeat about the prospect of expanding the treaty.

“With respect to nuclear weapons, I’ve spoken to President Putin and I’ve communicated with him,” Trump told reporters during a meeting with French President Emmanuel MacronEmmanuel Jean-Michel MacronOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Trump’s antics shouldn’t overshadow what he has accomplished in NATO MORE. “And we are — he very much wants to, and so do we, work out a treaty of some kind on nuclear weapons that will probably then include China at some point, and [France], by the way.  But it will include China and some other countries.”

“I spoke to China about it,” Trump added. “During one of our trade negotiations, they were extremely excited about getting involved in that. So, some very good things can happen with respect to that.”

China, though, has repeatedly rejected the idea of joining the treaty talks.

What the critics of that plan say: Critics have accused the administration of using China as a poison pill to kill New START. If the administration wants a broader arms control treaty, they argue, it can extend New START to buy time for negotiations that could take years.

Asked Thursday by Sen. Jeanne ShaheenCynthia (Jeanne) Jeanne ShaheenOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Biden reveals four women he could pick as his running mate MORE (D-N.H.) why the treaty can’t be extended to provide more time to negotiate with China, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy John Rood indicated the administration believes that will cede leverage.

“If the United States were to agree to extend the treaty now, I think it would make it less likely that we would have the ability to persuade Russia and China to enter negotiations on a broader agreement,” Rood said at a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

“China has not participated in these similar arms control agreements, as you know, in the past. We do retain time until February 2021. To state the obvious, today it’s 2019. And so there wouldn’t need to be a lot of negotiation required if there was a decision by the United States and Russia to extend the treaty just merely agreeing on the time period.”

ON TAP FOR TOMORROW

Rep. Sheila Jackson LeeSheila Jackson LeeOvernight Defense: Trump leaves door open to possible troop increase in Middle East | Putin offers immediate extension of key nuclear treaty Lawmakers to watch during Wednesday’s impeachment hearing Lawmakers honor JFK on 56th anniversary of his death MORE (D-Texas); Lisa Curtis, senior director for South and Central Asia at the National Security Council; Afghan Ambassador to the United States Roya Rahmani; former Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Anne Patterson; retired Army Gen. John Nicholson, former commander of the Resolute Support Mission; Javid Ali, policymaker in residence at the University of Michigan’s Ford School of Public Policy and former senior director for counterterrorism at the National Security Council; and Laurel Miller, former acting special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan at the State Department will speak at the Meridian International Center, the University of Michigan’s Weiser Diplomacy Center and the National Security Policy Center forum on defense and diplomacy in Afghanistan beginning at 8:30 a.m. in Washington, D.C.

ICYMI

— The Hill: Iran building hidden arsenal of short-range ballistic missiles in Iraq: report
 
— The Hill: US targets Iranian prisons with sanctions in response to deadly crackdown
 
— The Hill: North Korea takes shot at Trump: ‘Senility of a dotard’
 
— The Hill: GOP senator blocks Armenian genocide resolution
 
— The Hill: Opinion: Trump’s antics shouldn’t overshadow what he has accomplished in NATO

FDA official dodges question on future of Trump administration's vaping flavors ban

A top Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official was grilled by members of Congress on Wednesday for declining to answers questions about the agency’s plan to curb youth vaping rates.

Mitch Zeller, director of the Center for Tobacco Products, would not say whether the FDA is still considering a proposal to clear the market of flavored e-cigarette products it says are appealing to kids.

“There has been no final decision made on this policy. Because there is ongoing discussions that are taking place, I’m not going to be able to get into the substance of what was in that document,” Zeller said about guidance the FDA sent to the White House in October.

ADVERTISEMENT

That response wasn’t sufficient for Democratic members of the House Oversight and Reform Committee who have grown frustrated with the administration’s slow pace.

“I suggest you go back to the FDA and you tell them the American public is up in arms about this youth e-cigarette epidemic,” said Rep. Raja KrishnamoorthiSubramanian (Raja) Raja KrishnamoorthiOvernight Health Care — Presented by Johnson & Johnson — Virginia moves to suspend Medicaid work rules | Powerful House panel sets ‘Medicare for All’ hearing | Hospitals sue over Trump price rule | FDA official grilled on vaping policy FDA official dodges question on future of Trump administration’s vaping flavors ban Oversight Subcommittee to question FDA tobacco director over status of Trump’s vaping ban MORE (D-Ill.), chairman of the House Oversight and Reform Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy.

“It’s time to get their act together and put this flavor ban together immediately, without delay, before another child gets hooked to these e-cigarettes,” he added.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpStates slashed 4,400 environmental agency jobs in past decade: study Biden hammers Trump over video of world leaders mocking him Iran building hidden arsenal of short-range ballistic missiles in Iraq: report MORE and his top health officials said in September the administration would soon issue guidance clearing the market of flavored e-cigarettes to curb youth vaping rates.

The FDA sent that guidance in October to the White House regulatory office, which finished its review last month. But the administration hasn’t given any indication of whether it will move forward with a full flavor ban or pursue a different policy. 

Zeller wouldn’t say what the guidance contained, when it will be publicly released, if the White House made changes to it or if the administration will pursue another path to reduce teen vaping rates.

ADVERTISEMENT

He said that even after the FDA had submitted the final guidance for review, there were discussions ongoing between the White House and heads of federal agencies about what should be in it.

He also said that he wasn’t involved in those conversations but that acting FDA Commissioner Brett Giroir is, along with Joe Grogan, the head of the White House Domestic Policy Council. 

Trump was reportedly swayed by the “I Vape, I Vote” campaign, in which vapers threatened to vote against Trump if he cleared the market of flavors.

Vaping advocates argue that removing flavors from the market is harmful to adults who use those products to quit smoking and that raising the purchasing age from 18 to 21 is the best way to reduce teen vaping rates.

But anti-tobacco advocates and public health groups argue flavors shouldn’t be preserved for adults at the expense of children.

Trump held a listening session with advocates from all sides of the issue before Thanksgiving to try to find a compromise.

But Zeller ruled out that a compromise could exclude vape shops from a flavor ban, an idea that has been floated by some advocates.

“Under the law, we wouldn’t be able to differentiate between different retail outlets,” Zeller said.

Some vaping advocates have pushed for the administration to keep menthol on the market for adult users.

Zeller also said the FDA is “grappling” with data recently released that showed kids prefer mint flavors over menthol.

The FDA is thinking about how to “account for that, as we’re trying to make good policy here and do our job to protect kids,” Zeller said.