DC et Warner Bros. développent actuellement le long métrage “Blue Beetle”, centré sur le super-héros latino ayant l’apparence d’un scarabée.

DC et Warner Bros. développent actuellement le long métrage Blue Beetle, centré sur le super-héros latino ayant l’apparence d’un scarabée, rapporte le site TheWrap. A l’écriture de ce projet, on retrouvera Gareth Dunnet-Alcocer, le scénariste du reboot de Scarface.

Si le personnage a été créé à la fin des années 30, le long métrage Blue Beetle sera adapté de la troisième version du comic-book, celle publiée en 2006 mettant en vedette l’adolescent américano-mexicain Jaime Reyes. On y suit l’histoire pas comme les autres de ce garçon découvrant le Scarabée Bleu en rentrant de l’école avec ses deux meilleurs amis. Il emmène chez lui la créature, qui prend vie en pleine nuit. Celle-ci fusionne alors avec Jaime, qui devient un super-héros à la force extraordinaire.

A noter que dans le comic-book, le personnage de Blue Beetle fait équipe avec un certain Batman. L’homme chauve-souris, propriété de DC, viendra-t-il faire un saut dans le long métrage ?

Super-héros et comics : toutes les séries en développement

Click Here: France Football Shop

Vous avez voté, voici les résultats ! Les super-héros règnent-ils en maître dans le classement de vos dix films geek et héroïques préférés de 2018 ? Qui est le numéro 1 ? Marvel inscrit-il tous ses films de l’année dans le Top ? Réponses en images.

Réalisation : Constance Mathews – Montage : Julien Lambert

Après le bilan 2018, (re)découvrez le Top de vos plus grosses attentes de 2019 :

Fanzone Emissions d'Actu

A l’occasion du 500ème épisode de la série emblématique, diffusé ce soir sur TMC, la joyeuse bande venue d'”Hélène et les Garçons” commente l’évolution de ses amours, son long parcours et la fidélité de ses fans…

Click Here: kanken kids cheap

“Imaginez la difficulté de se renouveler après 25 ans ? Un moment il faut bien que ça dérape sinon ça devient d’un ennui mortel !” A l’occasion du 500ème épisode des Mystères de l’amour, nous avons rencontré l’infatigable et joyeuse bande d’Hélène et les Garçons. Réplique marquante, intrigue la plus folle, retour désiré : pour AlloCiné ils ont fait le bilan de 25 ans d’amours étonnantes, variées et qui ne cessent de se moderniser…

La réplique qui vous a le plus marqué

Hélène Rollès  (Hélène) : “Oh pour moi sans aucun doute la fameuse : “Et ils sont où les garçons?”

Patrick Puydebat (Nicolas) : Quand j’ai dû dire à Philippe Vasseur (José) : “Embrasse-moi”! C’était dur !

Sebastien Roch (Christian) : Ma réplique culte, ce serait “Ne m’appelez plus Cricri d’amour!” Plus sérieusement, j’ai le plus répété tout au long de ces années quelque chose comme : “Ils sont où les autres?”

Laly Meignan (Laly) : “Sextape !”

Serge Gisquière (Peter) : Oui ! Sextape ! Une réplique qu’on a improvisée ! Lors d’une scène où un rapprochement physique s’opère entre nous deux, tu cherches ton téléphone. Et là je lui dis “Sextape”? Elle me répond “Mais noooon!”

Laly Meignan : C’est très bien passé, du coup on l’a gardée!

L’intrigue la plus folle que vous ayez eu à jouer

Patrick Puydebat : Liée à la réplique marquante, l’épisode où José et moi étions en couple, à l’occasion d’un rêve de Bénédicte, sa compagne. Très dur à tourner, très drôle mais difficile !

Philippe Vasseur : Cela faisait des années qu’on voulait se choper, on en a eu l’occasion !

Patrick Puydebat : Sachez que c’est un très bon acteur, il est très enthousiaste et c’était donc compliqué !

Serge Gisquière : Mon personnage a eu quelques errements depuis que je suis revenu dans la série, notamment un où je suis retombé dans l’adolescence. Avant de devenir clochard ! J’étais donc un adolescent de 15 ans, je prenais Hélène pour ma mère, je faisais des crises. Cela a été l’occasion de nombreux fous rires parce que j’étais vraiment insoutenable. J’avais également retrouvé une libido d’adolescent, je courais après tout ce qui bougeait, c’était super drôle à jouer. J’ai joué l’amnésique, le mort, l’adolescent et là tout récemment l’objet des convoitises de Laly !

Laly Meignan : J’ai eu pas mal d’intrigues rocambolesques notamment autour de la vie intime que Laly a eue avec John (Richard Pigois) et qui m’ont mené à jouer des scènes que je n’aurais pas vécu dans ma vie intime. Certaines scènes étaient très difficiles à faire passer sans tomber dans le vulgaire et son humour et son intelligence ont beaucoup aidé. On improvise souvent !

Laure Guibert  (Bénédicte) : Avec Laly, lors de notre crash en avion dans la jungle en Martinique. C’était fantastique car loufoque. On a fait un crash mais au sol, ce qui était difficile à jouer sérieusement. J’ai aussi failli me noyer en plongée une fois. Sinon, à la reprise des Mystères de l’Amour, lorsque j’ai dû jouer une cougar. J’ai eu deux partenaires avec qui ça s’est très bien passé. Mais à un moment je me suis retrouvée dans un lit avec l’un des deux qui avait 23 ans. J’ai eu l’impression qu’il avait l’âge de mon fils, ça m’a fait bizarre, ce n’était pas très naturel pour moi même si on a bien rigolé !

L’intrigue en 25 ans que vous n’avez toujours pas joué et aimeriez jouer

Sebastien Roch : Que mon personnage vive une histoire au soleil. Cela me ferait du bien !

Patrick Puydebat : Etre professeur de snowboard pour tourner à la neige ! Quelque chose de fun où l’on se sent un peu moins vieux.

Hélène Rollès : Je n’ai aucun espoir d’évolution folle pour cette chère Hélène Girard.

Laure Guibert : J’ai toujours voulu attirer mon personnage vers quelque chose de plus loufoque. De lâcher prise. Elle est sérieuse, raisonnable, j’aimerais la voir un peu plus folle.

Un ancien personnage dont vous espérez le retour

Philippe Vasseur, Hélène Rollès, Patrick Puydebat : Nous on aimerait que Rochelle Redfield (Johanna) revienne plus souvent mais elle habite à New York, ce n’est pas évident !

Serge Gisquière : Eve Peyrieux qui jouait ma soeur Eve. Elle était insaisissable, légère, barrée.

Laure Guibert : Manuela c’est très important déjà. Annette Schreiber (Cynthia) me manque. Sinon un personnage va bientôt me rejoindre mais je ne dirais pas qui, vous en saurez plus très vite !

Propos recueillis par Laetitia Ratane. Cadre et montage : Constance Mathews.

Mercedes technical boss Paddy Lowe has told F1i that the new floor of the W07 Hybrid for 2016 could be the team’s secret weapon as they bid to stay out of reach of their rivals for a third consecutive season.

“I’m particularly proud of our floor solution, the large bargeboard area, that we call ‘floor W’,” said Lowe.

So far Mercedes is doing its best to keep the new floor under wraps and away from the prying eyes of their rivals, just like all the other teams in the paddock.

“One of the sports this time of year is to wait for the photos from our competitors,” agreed Lowe. “We all analyse that to find something that’s new, something we can think of.

“I feel like that our aerodynamics team have come out on top in that little competition,” he beamed.

“Forget the racing, forget the performance, it’s just they brought something that looks [mostly] different, which is great, because it would have been much easier for the team to just keep turning the [handle].”

During the eight days of pre-season testing at Barcelona, Mercedes appeared to have the edge on reliability – a last day glitch notwithstanding – but Ferrari looked to have closed the gap in terms of raw speed and performance.

However it won’t be until next weekend in Melbourne, Australia that a true baseline for the different levels of competitiveness between Mercedes and the other teams becomes clear.

And there may also be a chance to get a glimpse of the new Mercedes ‘floor W’ at some point during the first race of the 2016 Formula One season.

Click Here: Cheap FIJI Rugby Jersey

A closer look at the Manor MRT05

Carlos Sainz interview: The most important year, again

Click here for an exclusive Q&A with Honda’s Yusuke Hasegawa

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

People gather in support of pro-democracy protesters during a lunch break rally in the Kwun Tong area in Hong Kong on Wednesday. Hong Kong has been battered by months of mass rallies and violent clashes between police and protesters who are demanding direct popular elections of the semi-autonomous Chinese territory’s government, as well as an investigation into alleged police brutality.

President Trump has signed a bill signaling support for Hong Kong’s protests, prompting Beijing to issue a sharp response and summon the U.S. ambassador to China.

The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 allows the United States to level sanctions on individuals who carry out human rights violations in Hong Kong, which has been rocked by mass protests for more than five months.

The legislation also requires the State Department’s annual certification to Congress that Hong Kong is “upholding the rule of law and protecting rights” before continuing the city’s special relationship with the U.S.

Hong Kong’s special trade status with the U.S. has cemented the city’s position as a global financial hub, allowing it unparalleled access to American and Chinese markets.

The act has wide support among Hong Kong’s pro-democracy advocates, who argue the city is so crucial to China’s economy that Beijing would not risk losing Hong Kong’s trade status with the U.S. Graffiti and chants saying “pass the bill” proliferated across Hong Kong in recent weeks.

Critics argue the act will jeopardize Hong Kong’s economic future without sufficiently punishing China if it suppresses the protests with excessive force.

“To me, Beijing would like nothing more than the US to remove Hong Kong’s special status,” Susan Thornton, the former acting assistant secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific affairs, said in an October interview with the Hong Kong newspaper the South China Morning Post. “They’re wielding [the act] like a club, and they don’t seem to understand that the club is basically going to whack the Hongkongers upside the head, and the Beijingers will be dancing in the streets.”

A second bill signed into law by President Trump this week bans the U.S. sale of crowd management technology, such as rubber bullets and tear gas, to Hong Kong police.

President Trump expressed reservations over signing the bills, at a time when the administration has been locked in tense trade negotiations with Beijing.

“I signed these bills out of respect for President Xi [Jinping], China, and the people of Hong Kong. They are being enacted in the hope that Leaders and Representatives of China and Hong Kong will be able to amicably settle their differences leading to long term peace and prosperity for all,” he said in a statement.

In a separate statement, Trump appeared to take issue with aspects of the legislation: “Certain provisions of the Act would interfere with the exercise of the President’s constitutional authority to state the foreign policy of the United States,” he said, without specifying further.

Last week, he said on Fox News “I stand with Hong Kong” but “we’re also in the process of making the largest trade deal in history.”

China’s Foreign Ministry warned it will take countermeasures, without specifying what they will be.

“This is a severe interference in Hong Kong affairs, which are China’s internal affairs. It is also in serious violation of international law and basic norms governing international relations,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. “This Act will only further expose the malicious and hegemonic nature of US intentions to the Chinese people.”

On Monday, China’s Vice Foreign Minister Zheng Zeguang summoned U.S. Ambassador to China Terry Branstad, according to a Chinese notice posted on the ministry website, lambasting Branstad for U.S. meddling in “China’s internal affairs.”

China has repeatedly blamed foreign interference from the U.S. and U.K. for stoking the anti-government protests.

The protesters in Hong Kong say they are demonstrating to protect the limited autonomy and civil rights promised to them after the United Kingdom handed the city back to China in 1997. Millions took to the streets this summer in peaceful marches over a now-withdrawn extradition bill to send suspected criminals to mainland China for trial. Their demands now include democratic elections and investigations into alleged police brutality. According to Hong Kong demonstrators and international rights groups, Hong Kong police have used excessive force to crack down on the protests.

The U.S. legislation gained bipartisan support this year amid growing concerns that Beijing might suppress the current protests with military force or curtail civil liberties through restrictive national security measures.

The U.S. House and Senate passed the Hong Kong rights act with overwhelming, veto-proof majorities.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio applauded the president’s signing of the bill he sponsored.

“The U.S. now has new and meaningful tools to deter further influence and interference from Beijing into Hong Kong’s internal affairs,” Rubio told NPR’s Franco Ordoñez. “Following last weekend’s historic elections in Hong Kong that included record turnout, this new law could not be more timely in showing strong U.S. support for Hong Kongers’ long-cherished freedoms.”

NPR’s Emily Feng reported from Beijing. Franco Ordoñez and Scott Horsely contributed reporting from Washington, D.C.

The Ukrainian government is looking for ways to improve its relationship with President TrumpDonald John TrumpKamala Harris aide says in resignation letter: ‘I’ve never seen staff treated so poorly’ New Iowa ad compares Booker to the ‘other Rhodes Scholar mayor’ Lawmakers bypass embattled Mulvaney in spending talks MORE and could announce investigations that may be helpful to him politically, CNN reported Friday, citing two sources who recently met with Ukrainian officials. 

It is not clear what those probes could cover or when they would be announced, according to the network.

Potential investigations by Ukraine have been a focus of the House’s impeachment inquiry into Trump. The probe began following revelations that Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to look into Democratic presidential candidate Joe BidenJoe BidenCNN: Ukrainian government could announce probes beneficial to Trump Fears mount about Biden’s South Carolina firewall BET founder Robert Johnson: No 2020 Democrat is ‘capable of beating Trump’ MORE. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump has denied wrongdoing and has since publicly said that Ukraine should look into Biden. 

A series of current and former officials have testified in recent weeks regarding Trump’s dealings with Ukraine. 

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffCNN: Ukrainian government could announce probes beneficial to Trump Nadler sets Dec. 6 deadline for White House to say if it will take part in impeachment hearings Five questions looming over impeachment MORE (D-Calif.) on Monday informed Democratic lawmakers that the committees leading the impeachment probe are putting together a report for the Judiciary Committee that they hope to send after members return from Thanksgiving recess.

“Over the course of our inquiry, we have uncovered a months-long effort in which President Trump again sought foreign interference in our elections for his personal and political benefit at the expense of our national interest,” Schiff wrote.

Turkey on Thursday accused French President Emmanuel MacronEmmanuel Jean-Michel MacronTurkey accuses Macron of being a ‘sponsor of terrorism’ ISIS affiliate claims without evidence to have caused French helicopter crash that killed 13 Hundreds of farmers drive tractors into Paris to protest government policies MORE of being a “sponsor of terrorism” after France hosted an official from the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).

Mevlut Cavusogula, the Turkish foreign minister, said Macron was “wobbling” as he tried to be the leader of Europe, according to the BBC.

Macron hosted SDF spokeswoman Jihane Ahmed in October, angering Turkey, which considers the YPG terrorists.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He is already the sponsor of the terrorist organization and constantly hosts them at the Elysee,” Cavusogula told reporters. “If he says his ally is the terrorist organization… there is really nothing more to say.”

The foreign minister’s comments come a week before France and Turkey are scheduled to attend the NATO summit, where the ongoing violence in Syria is sure to be a leading topic.

Macron, meanwhile, confirmed Thursday he stood by his previous comments that NATO was “brain dead.” 

Click Here: ADELAIDE CROWS 2019 MEN’S HOME GUERNSEY

The relationship between France and Turkey has gotten more tense after Ankara bought a Russian air missile system this year. The French president also criticized Turkey for its offensive into Syria against Kurdish forces that had helped the U.S.-led coalition against ISIS.

 

TikTok, the short-video social media platform, blocked the account of a 17-year-old Muslim American woman following her post earlier this week in which she criticizes the Chinese government’s treatment of Uyghur Muslims in Northwest China.

At first, Feroza Aziz’s video seems a like a makeup tutorial. But several seconds in, Aziz’s switches gears, saying, “Use your phone that you’re using right now to search up what’s happening in China, how they’re getting concentration camps, throwing innocent Muslims in there.”

The 40-second video has racked up more than 1.5 million views.

ADVERTISEMENT

Aziz has since claimed that her account has been suspended by TikTok, The New York Times first reported. 

TikTok is owned by Chinese social media giant ByteDance, causing many lawmakers to voice concerns over whether the platform censors data at the request of the Chinese government or shares user data.

Josh Gartner, a spokesman at ByteDance, told the Times that Aziz was banned from her account because a previous post featured a photo of Osama Bin Laden, which violated the company’s policy against terrorist content.

ADVERTISEMENT

Aziz, however, asserts that post that TikTok refers to a slur that was regularly directed at her growing up in the U.S.: that she would marry Bin Laden.   

“I think that TikTok should not ban content that doesn’t harm anyone or shows anyone being harmed,” Aziz, who lives in New Jersey, told the Times.

On Wednesday, a TikTok official told CNN that neither the video nor Aziz’s account had been removed and that both could still be accessed.

“TikTok does not moderate content due to political sensitivities,” the company told the network in a statement.

In an interview earlier this month with the Times, TikTok head Alex Zhu denied any kind of collusion with the Chinese government. 

Click Here: ADELAIDE CROWS 2019 MEN’S HOME GUERNSEY

Lawsuits over President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump mocks Newsweek over story on Thanksgiving plans Obama looms over divided Democratic primary Fox News host on Warren: ‘Fitting’ to talk about ‘Pocahontas’ on Thanksgiving MORE’s tax returns and financial records are making their way through the court system, with some before the Supreme Court.

Trump is the first president in decades who hasn’t made any of his tax returns public, and he has been vigorously pursuing court action to keep information about his taxes and finances private. 

Recent court actions have been a mixed bag for Trump. In two lawsuits, Trump has lost at the appeals court level and is hoping that the Supreme Court will take up the cases. But in another, Republicans have scored a decisive win.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here are the latest developments in the lawsuits over Trump’s tax returns and financial records.

 

Trump’s challenge to the Manhattan district attorney’s subpoena for his tax returns

The parties in Trump’s lawsuit over New York prosecutors’ subpoena for his tax returns are waiting to hear if the Supreme Court will take up the case.

As part of a grand jury investigation, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office in August issued a subpoena to Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA, for the president’s personal and business tax returns and other financial records. The following month, Trump filed a lawsuit against Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. (D) and Mazars in an effort to block the subpoena, arguing that the subpoena is unlawful because presidents have immunity from being criminally investigated.

Federal judges in New York at both the district and appeals court levels have ruled against Trump. The appeals court said in its ruling that presidential immunity doesn’t bar the enforcement of the DA’s subpoena.

Trump’s lawyers have appealed the case to the Supreme Court, arguing in their petition earlier this month that the lower courts ruled incorrectly and that “whether the President is absolutely immune is an important and unsettled issue of federal law that the Court should resolve.” The Justice Department also urged the Supreme Court to hear the case. 

ADVERTISEMENT

But the Manhattan DA’s office said the Supreme Court shouldn’t hear the case, arguing that the court’s intervention isn’t necessary because the appeals court correctly applied past precedents in rejecting Trump’s argument about sweeping presidential immunity.

Trump’s petition is scheduled to be considered by the Supreme Court justices in a conference on Dec. 13.

The DA’s office has agreed not to enforce the subpoena until the Supreme Court issues a final determination in the case.

 

Trump’s challenge to the House Oversight and Reform Committee’s subpoena for his financial records

The second case that Trump wants the Supreme Court to take up is his lawsuit challenging the House Oversight and Reform Committee’s subpoena to accounting firm Mazars for his financial records.

The Democratic-led committee issued the subpoena in April. Unlike the subpoena New York prosecutors issued to Mazars, the Oversight and Reform Committee’s subpoena does not explicitly request Trump’s tax returns.

District and appellate judges in Washington, D.C., have sided with House Democrats, agreeing with them that the subpoena is enforceable and has valid legislative purposes.

The Supreme Court on Monday issued a stay of the subpoena until it disposes of the case. It has asked Trump to file his petition for why the Supreme Court should hear the case by Dec. 5.

 

Challenges to California’s tax return law

Republicans’ biggest victory so far has come in California, where the state’s highest court last week struck down a state law that would have required Trump and other presidential candidates to disclose their tax returns in order to appear on the 2020 primary ballot.

The California Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the presidential tax-return disclosure requirement violated a portion of the state’s constitution, siding with the California Republican Party over California Secretary of State Alex Padilla (D). The state Supreme Court’s ruling cannot be appealed.

There had also been several legal challenges to the California law in federal court. In October, a district judge in California granted a preliminary injunction against the law, and the state had appealed to the federal court of appeals for the ninth circuit. But after the California Supreme Court issued its ruling, Padilla and Gov. Gavin NewsomGavin Christopher NewsomWhere things stand in court fights over Trump tax returns California high court strikes down state law targeting Trump tax returns The Hill’s Morning Report – Wild Wednesday: Sondland testimony, Dem debate take center stage MORE (D) filed a motion seeking to have their federal appeal dismissed.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

The House Ways and Means Committee’s lawsuit over Trump’s federal tax returns

The case over House Democrats’ efforts to obtain Trump’s tax returns from the IRS has moved slower than some of the other lawsuits.

The House Ways and Means Committee filed the lawsuit in July, after the Treasury Department and IRS rejected committee Chairman Richard NealRichard Edmund NealWhere things stand in court fights over Trump tax returns Pelosi signals USMCA deal is ‘within range’ States embrace nudge theory to promote retirement savings MORE’s (D-Mass.) requests and subpoenas for six years of Trump’s federal tax filings. 

In September, lawyers for the Trump administration, along with Trump’s personal lawyers, filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The motion made a number of arguments, including that the House lacked standing to sue and that it has failed to state a claim on which it could receive relief.

Judge Trevor McFadden, a federal district judge in Washington D.C. and a Trump appointee, held a hearing on the administration’s motion earlier this month. During the hearing, he appeared supportive of the idea that his court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the case under Article III of the Constitution, but expressed reservations about letting all of the House’s counts move forward, asking the House’s lawyers if they would be OK with proceeding on only some of their counts. He also signaled that he would like the House and the administration to think about negotiating a resolution.

McFadden has yet to issue a ruling.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Trump’s lawsuit over his New York state tax returns

Several key developments occurred in November in Trump’s case aimed at blocking the House Ways and Means Committee from obtaining his New York state tax returns under a New York law.

First, Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee in federal district court in D.C., dismissed two New York officials from the lawsuit. Nichols agreed with the officials that the federal court in D.C. don’t have jurisdiction over them.

One week later, Nichols ordered the Ways and Means Committee to give the court and Trump notice if they request the president’s state tax returns from the New York Department of Taxation and Finance, and ordered the committee to not receive any requested state tax returns for a period of 14 days.

The House’s lawyers have said that Neal hasn’t yet determined whether he will request Trump’s state tax returns. Neal’s focus has been on trying to obtain Trump’s federal tax returns, and he may never end up seeking the state filings.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump’s challenge to House committees’ subpoenas to his banks

Trump’s lawsuit challenging the House Intelligence and Financial Services committees’ subpoenas for his bank records is currently pending before the federal appeals court in New York.

The two committees issued subpoenas earlier this year to Deutsche Bank and Capital One seeking financial records for Trump, his three oldest children and his businesses. The subpoenas aren’t being enforced while the appeals court considers the case.

During oral arguments in the case in August, the appeals court asked the banks if they had any tax returns relevant to the subpoenas. Subsequently, Capital One told the appeals court that it does not have any relevant tax returns. Deutsche Bank has told the court that it has tax returns relevant to the subpoena for two individuals, but that neither of those individuals are Trump.

A group of media outlets — including The Associated Press, CNN and The New York Times — had filed a motion to unseal the names of the people whose tax returns Deutsche Bank has, but the appeals court rejected that motion in October.

The Brazilian goalkeeper is hopeful that the Reds will be rewarded for their consistency with a first league title in 30 years come May

Liverpool deserve to win the Premier League this season, according to Alisson, who still sees room for improvement at Anfield despite a great start to the 2019-20 campaign.

Jurgen Klopp’s side have raced into an eight-point lead at the top of the league after 13 fixtures, winning 12 and drawing one, with reigning champions Manchester City nine points off the pace in third.

The Reds hammered home their title ambitions with a 3-1 victory over City on November 10, and have since extended their unbeaten domestic record to 30 matches.

Liverpool will be expected to pick up another three points when they host Brighton on Saturday afternoon, before looking ahead to a Merseyside derby clash with Everton on Wednesday.

Alisson is confident that the Premier League crown will be heading to Anfield next year, which he feels will be a just reward for the “desire” and “heart” the team has shown during his time at the club.

“My aims are to win everything we play for,” the Liverpool No.1 told Sky Sports.  

“Every time we go on the pitch to play a cup game, a league game or a Champions League game, we will give everything to win.

“The desire of the people is important for us and we have the same desire to win the Premier League this season.

“It’s something we try with our full heart to win because the people deserve it, the club deserves it and we deserve it also because of what we did last season and what we have done this season so far.

“But we need to keep going, keep playing to win every game and keep improving, that’s an important thing, but we will try to win all the tournaments we play.”

The Reds have won seven of their last eight matches across all competitions, with a few dramatic late winners thrown in after sub-par performances.

Alisson thinks its a “good sign” that Liverpool have been able to win ugly in recent weeks, but is eager to see improvements made defensively heading into a hectic festive period.

“I think we are playing the way that is necessary to win,” he said. “I think we can improve and this is a good sign because we are winning and we are not playing our best. We are playing as best as we can but some things we know we can do better, like the clean sheets.

“In a defensive way, sometimes with the ball we can prepare better for the situations, but our mentality is our strong point and we are winning the games because of our strong mentality.

Click Here: West Coast Eagles Guernsey

“For us, it’s a matter of keeping the high level for 90-plus minutes. Sometimes in the game, in two or three moments, we just relax. Sometimes it’s the quality of the opponent and you need to accept that, but we are working hard for the clean sheets.

“It’s a goal that we have on the pitch but the most important thing is the three points and we are getting them. If we go now until the end winning and conceding, I’ll be happy.”

Alisson won the Premier League’s Golden Glove award last term for registering 21 clean sheets, but isn’t “too concerned” about winning the award for a second straight season as Liverpool strive to maintain their consistency.

He added: “I’m not too concerned with the Golden Glove, when I won it, I already said the most important thing is the main goal, the wins.

“When we concede silly goals, part of me is angry because sometimes you know you can do better, not just the team, I’m speaking for myself also. You are a little bit angry with that but we are doing well in the general perspective.”