3 Online Brokers Cut Commissions To Zero As Free Trading Edges Toward The Norm

Charles Schwab is slashing its online trading commission from $4.95 to zero starting Monday. The company cited competition from new online rivals.

Updated at 4:05 p.m. ET Wednesday

Wall Street is in a race to the bottom. On Tuesday, Charles Schwab said it will slash its commissions for online trades to zero in response to looming competition from app-based upstarts like Robinhood.

Hours later, TD Ameritrade matched Schwab’s move. And on Wednesday, E-Trade followed suit.

Schwab’s stock closed down about 10% Tuesday. Its competitors took a bigger hit, with TD Ameritrade shares falling nearly 26% and E-Trade dropping about 16%.

In its announcement, Schwab said eliminating online trading commissions equates to about $90 million to $100 million in quarterly revenue, or about 3% to 4% of revenue.

Steve Boyle, TD Ameritrade’s chief financial officer, said in a statement that the move to eliminate commissions will cost his company between $220 million and $240 million per quarter, or about 15% to 16% of revenues.

E-Trade estimated that cutting its commissions would cost the firm about $75 million per quarter.

Schwab is bringing its online trading commission down for U.S. and Canadian equities and exchange-traded funds from $4.95 to zero starting next Monday. The firm already offers commission-free trades on hundreds of ETFs.

“It’s the right thing to do for clients, removing one of the last remaining barriers to making investing accessible to everyone and continuing our tradition of challenging the status quo on behalf of individual investors,” Chief Financial Officer Peter Crawford said in the announcement.

He also cited competition from both traditional e-brokers and new firms in the market.

These newer firms, including Robinhood and Acorns, market themselves with commission-free or low-cost investing and are often mobile-friendly and aimed at younger people. Crawford said Schwab isn’t feeling pressure from them yet but didn’t want to wait too long to respond.

“It has seemed inevitable that commissions would head toward zero, so why wait?” he said.

TD Ameritrade and E-Trade currently charge $6.95 for online trades. E-Trade said its U.S. commissions will fall to zero on Monday, and TD Ameritrade said its move will be effective Thursday.

“We’ve been taking market share with a premium price point, and with a $0 price point and a level playing field, we are even more confident in our competitive position and the value we offer our clients,” said Tim Hockey, TD Ameritrade’s president and chief executive officer.

Before TD Ameritrade and E-Trade made their announcements, Devin Ryan, an analyst at JMP Securities, predicted Schwab’s competitors would respond, given the pressure their shares were under.

In a note to clients, Ryan said the brokerage industry is entering a new commission price war as free trading becomes the norm.

He said eliminating commissions will be manageable for Schwab.

“Given Schwab’s stated focus that price does matter and its roots as a low-cost provider, we think this decision was an inevitability over time as the company does not want to be in the minority in charging customers for trading,” Ryan wrote.

Editor’s note: Charles Schwab & Co. and E-Trade are among NPR’s financial sponsors.

Peter Talbot is an intern on the NPR Business Desk.

Poll: Dems say Warren reigned in second primary debates

Sen. Elizabeth Warren easily prevailed in last week’s primary debates in Detroit, according to a poll out Tuesday.

Three out of 10 respondents dubbed Warren the winner for her debate performance last week, a POLITICO/Morning Consult poll of registered Democratic primary voters found. Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden rounded out the top three with 18 percent and 14 percent of respondents dubbing them the top performer, respectively.

Warren also received the highest percentage of “excellent” ratings from voters on her debate performance, with 44 percent of primary voters giving her top marks. Sanders came in second, with 32 percent giving him an “excellent” rating, followed by Biden, who 27 percent said put on an “excellent” performance.

Voters were least impressed with the performance of New York Mayor Bill de Blasio; just over a quarter — 26 percent — of voters called his performance “poor.” This could be in part because of de Blasio’s willingness during the debate to criticize former President Barack Obama’s record on deportations, despite Tuesday’s poll finding that Obama enjoys a 94 percent favorability rating among Democratic primary voters.

Respondents were also cool on Sen. Kamala Harris, despite her being one of the breakout stars of the first debate because of sparring with Biden.

“Democratic primary voters were underwhelmed with Senator Kamala Harris’ debate performance last week as her poll bounce continues to fade,” Tyler Sinclair, Morning Consult’s vice president, said in a statement. “Notably, 43 percent of Democratic primary voters said Harris performed ‘excellent’ at the June debates, compared to 20 percent who said the same about last week’s Detroit debates.”

Despite voters decisively saying Warren put on the best performance out of the 20 candidates featured over the two nights, they were not as confident in her ability to beat President Donald Trump in next year’s general election.

That distinction went to Biden, who 42 percent of primary voters said has the best chance of unseating Trump — more than twice the percentage that said the same of his next closest competitor. Sanders came in second, with 17 percent giving him the best chance of beating the president, followed by Warren, who 13 percent of voters said had the best chance of knocking Trump out of office.

While primary voters see Biden as the most electable Democratic hopeful, the former vice president is also named most frequently by primary voters as the candidate they would absolutely not vote for. Voters who were stridently opposed to Biden clocked in at 14 percent, followed by a cluster of four other candidates: 9 percent for Sanders, author Marianne Williamson at 8 percent, and Warren and Harris at 7 percent each.

Still, only 4 in 10 Democratic voters said they watched at least one of the debates, despite 73 percent calling the debates either very or somewhat important to their decision about which candidate to support in the primaries.

As the primary field is likely to be whittled because of steeper qualification requirements for the next set of debates in the fall, Democratic primary voters were most likely to say that Williamson should drop out of the race.

Morning Consult is a nonpartisan media and technology company that provides data-driven research and insights on politics, policy and business strategy.

More details on the poll and its methodology can be found in these two documents: Toplines: https://politi.co/2ZCRYAW | Crosstabs: https://politi.co/2Zy8xOc

Putin, Hungarian leader pushed Trump on Ukraine corruption narrative: reports

Days before a key meeting with White House advisers about Ukraine, foreign leaders including Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinThese 3 women are defining the race to unseat Trump The Russo-Chinese alliance emerges Russia’s snub of Geneva Convention protocol sets dangerous precedent MORE and Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban reportedly urged President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump says he doesn’t want NYT in the White House Veterans group backs lawsuits to halt Trump’s use of military funding for border wall Schiff punches back after GOP censure resolution fails MORE to take a hostile view of Kiev.

Trump met with Orban on May 13, 10 days before the meeting with several top presidential advisers, including now-outgoing Energy Secretary Rick PerryJames (Rick) Richard PerryOvernight Energy: Watchdog warns of threats to federal workers on public lands | Perry to step down on December 1 | Trump declines to appear in Weather Channel climate special Perry to step down on December 1 Here’s what to watch this week on impeachment MORE, former special envoy to Ukraine Kurt VolkerKurt VolkerDiplomats describe all-time low in morale at State under Trump Here’s what to watch this week on impeachment Perry won’t comply with subpoena in impeachment inquiry MORE and Gordon D. Sondland, the ambassador to the European Union, The New York Times reports.

His conversations with Orban and Putin strengthened his views that Ukraine was a corrupt nation looking to undermine him in the 2016 presidential election, The Washington Post reports.

The Hungarian and Russian leaders, however, reportedly did not specifically urge Trump to ask Ukraine for information on Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenTrump says he doesn’t want NYT in the White House Warren to protest with striking Chicago teachers Schiff punches back after GOP censure resolution fails MORE.

Former national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonGadhafi’s ghost still haunts US policymakers Trump job approval slips 2 points in Gallup poll Washington indecision compounded the Kurds’ dilemma MORE and Fiona Hill, the former National Security Council’s senior director for Eurasian and Russian affairs, opposed the Trump-Orban White House meeting, but acting White House chief of staff Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyTrump urges GOP to fight for him Bill Press: Mulvaney proves need for daily briefings Gingrich calls for eliminating White House press corps in wake of Mulvaney briefing MORE ultimately overruled them, the Post reports.

During the May 23 meeting, several top Trump advisers reportedly reassured the president that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky deserved support from the U.S., but Trump called the Ukrainians “terrible people” who “tried to take me down” in 2016.

At the time of the meeting, Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiTrump says he doesn’t want NYT in the White House Diplomat who raised Ukraine concerns to testify in Trump impeachment probe Pelosi releases ‘fact sheet’ saying Trump has ‘betrayed his oath of office’ MORE, was also working to influence the president about Ukraine as he aimed to pressure Kiev to provide damaging information about Democrats. Trump then pressured Zelensky during a July 25 call to investigate Biden and his son. House Democrats launched in impeachment inquiry in September amid revelations surrounding that call. 

The Orban visit came up during closed-door testimony last week from George Kent, a deputy assistant secretary of State, according to the Post, Kent was the fourth witness in the impeachment investigation, following Volker, Hill and former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.

Click Here: Argentina Rugby Shop

China asks WTO for $2.4B in retaliatory sanctions against US

China is asking the World Trade Organization (WTO) for $2.4 billion in retaliatory sanctions against the U.S. for violating a ruling about tariffs on Chinese products during former President Obama’s administration.

The Dispute Settlement Body for the WTO plans to review the 2012 case on Oct. 28, according to a document published Monday and obtained by Reuters. WTO appeals judges ruled the U.S. did not comply with a WTO ruling on tariffs placed on Chinese solar panels, wind towers and steel cylinders and that China could place sanctions if the tariffs were not abolished.

ADVERTISEMENT

The U.S. has objected to the ruling and may challenge the retaliatory sanctions that the dispute body effectively approved in August, according to Reuters. U.S. officials have argued that the body found “the wrong legal interpretation in this dispute.”

China filed the case with the WTO about seven years ago, after it said U.S. anti-subsidy tariffs were placed on $7.3 billion in Chinese exports. The WTO ruled China used state-owned enterprises to falsify its economy but that the U.S. needed to respect Chinese prices to calculate subsidies.

The Trump administration is encouraging the WTO to adjust its rules that permit China to be designated as a “developing country,” asserting it allows China to receive easier treatment from the organization, according to Reuters. 

The U.S. and China have been involved in a trade war throughout the past year, with each country imposing tariffs against the other.  

U.S. officials in Washington and Geneva told Reuters they had no further comment.

Alan Wolff, deputy director-general of the WTO, declined to comment to Reuters on the specific case but said the organization “can’t prevent a trade war, but it can be part of the solution.” 

“There may be difficult times ahead, but ultimately the trading system will be survive and be improved,” Reuters reported he said.

From learning on his feet to policy director

In July, 31-year-old think tank researcher Shai Akabas achieved something that hordes of well-funded lobbyists and power players in Washington often fail to do: He got Congress to take action.

Akabas, the director of economic policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, released an analysis of what he calls the “X Date,” the day the Treasury Department runs out of legal authority to pay its bills.

ADVERTISEMENT

Congress, still reeling from a 35-day partial shutdown earlier in the year, had planned to work on reaching a deal on the debt limit into September, hoping to package it up with a stopgap measure to prevent a shutdown in October, but Akabas’s analysis showed that they didn’t have that kind of time.

In recent years, the Treasury Department had been using a process of internal borrowing known as “extraordinary measures” to buy time after the technical debt limit was reached.

But unlike the debt limit written into law, it was harder to estimate precisely when those extraordinary measures would be exhausted. A change in interest rates, an unexpected turn in the economy, a meager showing from corporate taxes or a sudden spike in spending could mean the Treasury would hit a hard limit weeks earlier — or later — than estimated.

Outside of the Treasury Department, Akabas’s X Date analysis was perhaps the only estimate of what the Treasury’s real timeline was, and it was widely seen as the most reliable.

Talks moved into high gear, and before the month was through, Congress had agreed on a spending deal and passed legislation that would prevent a default.

“It’s thrilling to be able to see the work that you put in go towards a good purpose in terms of impacting public policy,” Akabas said in a recent interview with The Hill.

“The only disappointing thing in the whole debt limit element is that I most enjoy informed public policy that is proactively helping people achieve better economic and financial outcomes that improve their lives. This is more about preventing a catastrophic outcome,” he added.

Born and raised in New York, Akabas had always had a knack for math, but it was a family connection in the form of census expert Terri Ann Lowenthal, an aunt, that helped direct his interests toward the public sphere.

“We used to visit her down in D.C.,” Akabas said of Lowenthal, who at the time was the staff director for the House census oversight subcommittee.

“It was thrilling to sort of see how public policy works, and so I knew that that was an element of interest to me,” he added.

After graduating from Cornell and working on New York Mayor Michael BloombergMichael Rubens BloombergFrom learning on his feet to policy director Biden struggles to reverse fall Democrats’ debate divisions open the race to new (or old) faces MORE’s reelection campaign, Akabas planned to stay in New York, but a job at the Bipartisan Policy Center caught his eye.

“I sort of knew what a think tank was, but not exactly, and it was gonna be doing economic research — that was sort of the extent that I understood about it. I knew it was related to fiscal policy and debt reduction,” he said.

The year was 2010, and the sudden rise of the Tea Party had thrown fiscal issues into the spotlight. Akabas was put onto a task force headed by former New Mexico Sen. Pete Domenici (R) and Alice Rivlin. She was a towering figure in the world of budget policy who had been the first director of the Congressional Budget Office, headed the White House’s Office of Management and Budget and had served as vice chairwoman of the Federal Reserve.

Shortly after Akabas started, then-President Obama had appointed Rivlin as one of 18 members of an official debt-reduction group known as the Simpson-Bowles Commission, giving Akabas’s work a direct line to government policy.

Akabas, who had no previous expertise with the federal budget, had to learn on his feet.

“It was effectively getting a master’s degree in economics,” said Akabas, who later got his actual master’s from Georgetown.

He recalled meeting Michael BennetMichael Farrand BennetBennet: Warren ‘not being honest about’ her ‘Medicare for All’ plan Senate Democrats want Warren to talk costs on ‘Medicare for All’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden camp faces new challenges MORE, then a Democratic candidate for his current Colorado Senate seat, at a fundraiser. They talked about some of the issues facing the federal budget. After Bennet was elected, he embraced the types of fiscally sustainable policies the two had discussed. That, Akabas said, was the moment he realized the impact of his work.

“I don’t work for a member of Congress. I’m not an elected official. I don’t work in the administration, but I love being able to have those conversations and educate and inform people about the decisions that they’re making and oftentimes getting to see the work that we’re producing embodied in whatever gets put forward,” he said.

Akabas’s next project at the Bipartisan Policy Center focused on the debt ceiling and paired him with Jerome Powell, now the chairman of the Federal Reserve. Akabas said Powell, who had served as a Treasury undersecretary in the second Bush administration, saw the issue of debt ceiling becoming more politicized and worried that lawmakers were not well-informed on the issue.

“Jay, much to his credit, realized that this was going to be a problem,” Akabas said.

It was through that connection that Akabas began working on the so-called X Date, a term he credits Powell with coining.

“We were in the position of effectively explaining to people: Here’s what the debt limit is, here’s why it matters, here’s our independent estimate, which was generated from either Congressional Budget Office data, Treasury data combination, and other sources of when that X Date would arrive. And we were learning on the job,” he said.

Republicans were skeptical of the Obama administration’s estimates, he said, thinking they were being fed politicized information to add pressure in negotiations. That left an opening for independent analysis.

Soon enough, leaders such as then-Speaker John BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerIs Congress retrievable? Boehner reveals portrait done by George W. Bush Meadows to be replaced by Biggs as Freedom Caucus leader MORE (R-Ohio) were briefing their caucuses with Bipartisan Policy Center data as the debt ceiling increasingly saw mainstream media attention.

Since then, Akabas has risen to lead the economic department at the center, continued to refine the X Date analysis and turned much of his attention toward issues such as retirement security.

While he has no plans to leave the think tank that launched his career nearly a decade ago, Akabas says he would be open to switching gears and serving on the government side of the ledger, should the opportunity arise.

Akabas credits mentors such as Rivlin and Powell with much of his achievement.

“If you sort of attach yourself to people who you see as visionaries, leaders in a particular realm, it’s sort of endless, the amount that you can glean from following them around on a day-to-day basis,” he said.

USWNT announces friendlies at Scotland and Portugal

Jill Ellis’ side will head to Europe in November as preparations for next summer’s World Cup continue

Click Here: United Kingdom Rugby Shop

The U.S. women’s national team has announced friendly matches at Portugal and Scotland in November. 

Jill Ellis’ side will take on Portugal on Nov. 8 in Lisbon and will then face Scotland on Nov. 13 in Glasgow as it continues preparations for the 2019 World Cup.

The U.S. qualified for the World Cup last week, seeing off Jamaica in the Concacaf Women’s Championship semifinal before defeating Canada in the competition final. 

Now the team will travel to Europe for the first time in 2018, taking on Portugal in a suburb of Lisbon and then Scotland. 

“For planning purposes, it was important to have this last FIFA window of the year be in Europe,” Ellis said in a federation release.

“We’ve played a competitive domestic schedule but adapting to being on the road is an important part of preparations for next year. Playing a World Cup-qualified team and a country that is on the rise will be two good matches to end our 2018 schedule.”

Portugal fell short of the World Cup by finishing third in their UEFA qualifying group, while Scotland reached their first World Cup by topping UEFA Group 2. 

USMNT coaching search: Who is the best candidate for the job?

The Columbus Crew’s late-season struggles have raised some questions about which coach is really best suited to lead the USA moving forward

If U.S. national team general manager Earnie Stewart really has made up his mind and decided to hire Gregg Berhalter as the next USMNT coach, then the past month hasn’t quite gone according to plan.

With Berhalter’s Crew dragging itself to the finish line of an underwhelming season, and heading into the final weekend needing a win to avoid missing out on the playoffs, there are suddenly fresh questions about the man who has spent several months considered a shoe-in to be the next USMNT coach.

A 2-4-3 record in their past nine has the Crew needing to beat Minnesota United to ensure a place in the postseason, a struggle few could have envisioned heading into 2018 for a Crew team that thoroughly impressed in 2017 and brought back all its key pieces.

You can point to the distractions of a potential move from Columbus to Austin, Texas as something that made Berhalter’s job more difficult, but given how good the Crew looked in the first half of the season, that distraction becomes tougher to accept as an excuse for a second-half swoon.

The Crew have the 13th-best record in MLS, having scored the second-fewest goals in the league — ahead of only the lowly Colorado Rapids— and currently boast a negative goal differential.

In fairness to Berhalter, his candidacy for the USMNT head coach position shouldn’t be about just one season, and Stewart surely isn’t going to pin his evaluation on 2018 alone, but what the Crew’s struggles have done is raise some real questions about Berhalter’s candidacy, and how it stacks up against other coaches Stewart could have in consideration for the post.

Tata Martino’s recent decision to leave Atlanta United at the end of the season has also put a magnifying glass on Berhalter as the leading USMNT candidate because Martino wasn’t even considered for the position and he’s putting the finishing touches on a pair of seasons with Atlanta United that should have put him in the conversation. Stewart’s public pronouncement that the next USMNT coach would have to speak English effectively ruled out Martino, but the struggles of Berhalter’s Crew have only served to leave many wondering whether excluding a top candidate based on a language barrier was a wise one, especially if it means that worthy candidate winds up coaching the USMNT’s arch-rival — Mexico — as expected.

Even if we stick to the idea that being an English-speaking coach with long-standing ties to American soccer is the minimum prerequisite for consideration to be the next USMNT coach, there are several candidates who stack up well next to Berhalter, and who could argue that they are more qualified to coach the USMNT than Berhalter.

Berhalter, Peter Vermes, Oscar Pareja, Jesse Marsch and Tab Ramos are all coaches who have put themselves in position to be considered, even if it doesn’t seem like Vermes, Marsch and Ramos are being seriously considered. Here is a closer look at how they all stack up in categories that should be important to the process of selecting the next USMNT coach.



Vermes is a former USMNT captain as a player and has fashioned an outstanding career as Sporting KC head coach. He has won multiple trophies in his time in charge, but if there’s a hole in his resume it’s the fact he hasn’t been a national team coach before. Fortunately for him, the same can be said for the other candidates we are considering.

Marsch didn’t have the playing career of Vermes, Berhalter or Ramos, but he has blossomed as a coach, helping the Red Bulls turn into a league powerhouse. He has taken the next step and made a move to Europe to try and establish himself as a coach overseas. Pareja has the experience of working in the youth ranks, running the FC Dallas academy while also having served as a U.S. Under-17 assistant. He enjoyed success as head coach of the Colorado Rapids before taking over FC Dallas in 2014 and helping lead FCD to a Supporters’ Shield and U.S. Open Cup title.

Berhalter is a World Cup veteran as a player and has spent five seasons coaching the Crew, leading them to the 2015 MLS Cup final. Trophies have eluded Berhalter’s Crew, but they have played some of the most attractive soccer in MLS, and done so on one of the smallest salary budgets in the league.

Ramos was a USMNT star during his playing days and transitioned into the coaching rankings at the youth level. He is in his fourth cycle as U.S. Under-20 national team coach and his lack of head coaching experience in the professional and senior team ranks is a clear strike against his candidacy.



Berhalter has often been lauded for being a creative tactician whose coaching philosophy emphasizes possession-based soccer. He has plenty of fans because of the attractive style the Crew have been able to play, especially given the fact the Crew have one of the lowest payrolls in MLS. You need only look at some of the praise of foreign coaches and star players who have come into the league and lauded Berhalter and his Crew team for their style of play to understand how well respected he is tactically.

Pareja’s FC Dallas teams don’t get quite the same amount of love as Berhalter’s Crew for their style, but FCD has established an attractive way of playing that has been able to withstand the losses of some key figures in recent years, such as Fabian Castillo and Mauro Diaz. There is a clear Latino influence to Pareja’s tactical approach, and while that may not be everybody’s cup of tea, it’s tough to argue with the success he has enjoyed with FC Dallas, boasting a better record than Berhalter’s Crew despite spending on a similar level.

Jesse Marsch and Peter Vermes have been able to establish very distinct pressing-style tactical approaches that have yielded considerable success, and you can make the case that they each abide by a coaching philosophy that would fit well with the American player pool. Of course, their tactical philosophy is on the opposite end of the stylistic spectrum from Berhalter, and if Earnie Stewart and U.S. Soccer decide that possession-based soccer is the path to follow, then Berhalter will have the edge over Marsch and Vermes despite the fact they both have had considerably more success than Berhalter has had.

Ramos trails the pack in this category not because he’s a bad tactician, but because he has never been a professional head coach with the time to implement a stylistic approach with a group of players over a long period of time. Having U-20 cycles every two years doesn’t lend itself to much continuity, even less so when he has often been forced to build teams without the most talented players in the pool. That being said, Ramos’ U-20 teams, especially the 2017 group, played a very attractive style of attack-minded soccer.



Vermes has the most experience of the five candidates we are spotlighting, and the best body of work as an in-game tactician. Sporting KC has scored twice as many second-half goals as its opponents this season and has long been a team known to turn the pressure on late in games and find goals.

Marsch’s strength is setting his team up in the best possible way to overwhelm opponents from the opening whistle, but he hasn’t really developed a reputation for making the late-game maneuvers to turn losses into victories. That said, the Red Bulls have been a strong second-half team in 2018 and that started before Marsch left midseason.

The Crew have been known as a team that concedes more second-half goals than they score, and that’s with goals being tough to come by in 2018. Pareja’s FC Dallas has been terrible at allowing more second-half goals than first-half goals, which doesn’t put his ability to make adjustments in the best light.

Ramos’ body of work is too small to really have a sense for his ability to make late-game adjustments, but he made some very good moves throughout the 2017 U-20 cycle, both in qualifying and at the World Cup.



Given how young the player pool is heading into the 2022 Olympic qualifying cycle, being able to work with young players and get the most out of them is paramount. Ramos has a major advantage over the rest because of the amount of work he has put in with so many key figures in the player pool.

For the rest of the candidates, their work in developing young talents speaks volumes. Marsch helped USMNT standouts Tyler Adams and Matt Miazga develop as professionals and his efforts to help them flourish as teenagers is unmatched. Pareja has shown an ability to develop young players as well, such as Kellyn Acosta, Jesse Gonzalez and more recently Reggie Cannon.

Vermes has helped turn several players into accomplished internationals, including 2014 USMNT World Cup veterans Matt Besler and Graham Zusi, as well as Honduran midfielder Roger Espinoza. He didn’t have a track record of playing very young players, but more recently we have seen some youngsters get opportunities under Vermes, such as Danlel Salloi and more recently 16-year-old Gianluca Busio.

Berhalter’s Crew currently have Wil Trapp and Zack Steffen on the USMNT, but both were established top prospects before working with Berhalter. He does get credit for helping them both reach their potential, but when you consider how some other young player struggled in Columbus but thrived elsewhere, such as Romain Gall and Ben Sweat, it makes you wonder how he will handle an extremely young USMNT group heading into the 2022 qualifying cycle.

Click Here: Australia Rugby Shop

D.C. United hosts Columbus as full MLS playoff schedule announced

Wayne Rooney’s side clinched a home knockout round game, which is set for Thursday night at Audi Field

Major League Soccer announced its 2018 playoff schedule on Sunday, following the final round of regular-season matches. 

D.C. United, led by the resurgent Wayne Rooney, earned the fourth seed in the Eastern Conference and will host the fifth-seed Columbus Crew on Thursday at Audi Field in a knockout round game. 

Third-seeded New York City FC will host the six-seed Philadelphia Union on Wednesday in the East’s other knockout round match, with the winners of those two games set to face the New York Red Bulls and Atlanta United in the conference semifinals.

Click Here: liz claiborne perfume

In the Western Conference, fourth-seed FC Dallas will host the fifth-seeded Portland Timbers on Wednesday, while third-seed Los Angeles FC hosts sixth-seed Real Salt Lake on Thursday. 

Those two winners will move on to the conference semifinal, where Sporting Kansas City and the Seattle Sounders await. 

The conference semifinals will take place over two legs, with games Nov. 4, Nov. 8 and Nov. 11.

Winners of the conference semifinals will face off in the two-leg conference finals on Nov. 25 and Nov. 29. Those two winners of those ties will take part in MLS Cup on Dec. 8, at the home of the team with the better regular season record. 

For the full MLS playoff bracket, click HERE. 

 

How Laporte became Guardiola's untouchable, and perhaps the Premier League's best centre-back

The manager has chopped and changed his Manchester City line-up in a bid to evolve his side, yet the Frenchman has been an ever-present

Aymeric Laporte fired his team to victory twice last Tuesday. At the Metalist Stadium he headed in Manchester City’s second goal against Shakhtar Donetsk, setting them well on their way to top spot in their Champions League group.

And earlier that afternoon, in his room at a five-star Kharkiv golf resort, he emerged victorious from a frantic round of Fortnite. The wildly popular battle royale game has penetrated the City dressing room, to the extent that thousands of gamers across the world will have unwittingly found themselves trying to out-gun a battle-hardened trio of City first-teamers in the past few months; Nicolas Otamendi and Brahim Diaz regularly fill up Laporte’s three-man squads.

Portable PlayStations are a regular sight on City away trips but fans need not worry about a lack of focus, and least of all from Laporte, who has quickly earmarked himself as one of Pep Guardiola’s most trusted and important players.

The 24-year-old, signed for a then-club-record £57 million ($73m) in January, is rotation-proof; Guardiola has chopped and changed his systems and starting XIs all season, yet the Frenchman is the only City outfield player to have played every minute in the Premier League, and one of three to have completed all three Champions League games.

Laporte, just like everybody else, has competition for his place. City have four fine centre-backs, each of whom has a skill-set that lends them to a particular game. Aerial bombardment away from home? Vincent Kompany’s your man. A deep-lying defence that needs unpicking? Send for John Stones. A mixture of both? That’ll be Nicolas Otamendi.

But Laporte is the man for all occasions. Why?

Click Here: jean paul gaultier perfume

“First of all, his level,” Guardiola said at his Friday press conference. “Today, for example, in the training session he was so focused. Every action was there. I am seeing the same with Vincent, John and Nico.”

Laporte, who lives in the city centre, has fully committed himself to making the grade in England, perhaps most notably when it comes to his diet. All of the City players eat well, given the expertise on offer at the training ground kitchen – hailed as ‘the bet restaurant in Manchester’ in a recent book – and every player takes food home with them, but Laporte is said to take a special interest in what he eats, not just eating what he is given but trying to understand why he is given it, and how and why it is prepared.

Yet as Guardiola says, the other centre-backs are just as committed, and have proven just as reliable on the pitch in the past 18 months. The key is that Laporte offers something different, a new dimension to City’s game.

“But especially because he is left-footed playing on the left side,” Guardiola added. “He gives us an alternative for the build-up, quicker and faster than the other ones who are right-footed. When you receive to go to the right, you have to go inside, because you want to go to the right foot. In the left, you go to that side, so it helps us to create this build-up [to the left, and to the right with a diagonal pass]. With the right foot, it is a little bit more complicated. That would be, with the ball, one of the reasons why.

“We can adapt it but we can play a movement, like the full-back drops a little bit, he can play a bit more in the middle and change it,” Guardiola adds, with his way of explaining tactical concepts that probably only his assistant, Mikel Arteta, fully grasps first time around.

There are also old-fashioned elements of defending, of course.

“It is not just the left, his attention defensively, winning duels, that is why,” Guardiola says. “At the end I can move the squad but when one player plays good, good and good, it gives me confidence so I give you another opportunity. It is not complicated.”

Laporte’s run in the team has also been boosted by his increasingly baffling omission from the France team; he can rest during international breaks and indeed in September he spent his time off in a villa in Mykonos with Brahim and Sergio Aguero, who paid for the trip.

Guardiola insists Laporte will need a rest later in the season, when those international breaks dry up, but for now there would be little sense in taking him out of a team that is actually defending better than even last season.  

Laporte has had the second most touches (746), has played the second most passes (824) and the second most successful passes (768) in the entire Premier League, behind only Jorginho, the would-be City player who is establishing Maurizio Sarri’s playing style at Chelsea.

According to Statsbomb , Laporte is also in the top 20 in the Premier League for ‘deep progressions’ – passes, dribbles and carries into the opposition final third per 90 minutes. His raking passes from central defence to the right of midfield certainly contribute to that.

Those actions mean City have relatively little traditional defending to do, which is why he is nowhere near the top of the rankings for aerial duels, clearances and tackles. But that’s absolutely fine for the English champions. “What I say is that you might look at the five goals and say, ‘How good is the attack’? It’s a mistake, it’s the team who build it up from the back,” Vincent Kompany said last weekend. “If you look at the fact we didn’t concede [against Burnley] and say ‘how good is the defence?’ that’s a mistake too.”

On several occasions this season Guardiola has hailed his side’s ability to restrict their opponents to very few shots on target, something he puts down to City’s positional game – their way of controlling the opposition via their own organisation on the pitch, via their constant passing and, when needed, intelligent pressing.

Statsbomb highlight that while City are allowing 6.44 shots per game, which is up from 6.37 last season, their expected goals conceded are down from 0.66 to 0.51. City’s opponents may be having more shots this season, but they appear to be more speculative and of less quality than last season, when City only conceded 27 goals anyway, the best record in the league.

It would be wrong to attribute City’s improvement to Laporte alone, just as Guardiola and Kompany would not attribute it to ‘the defence’ as a unit, but the Frenchman’s continued presence in an ever-changing team and what he brings to it – the quick passes, the raking passes, the sheer amount of touches – show that he is an integral part of what is an evolving side.

And to think he could have quite easily not joined City at all. After snubbing them in 2016 his name was scorched from a list of targets in the summer of 2017, and it was only after Southampton priced up Virgil van Dijk at £75m ($96m) that the Blues reconsidered their stance and made contact with Laporte ahead of his eventual January move.

Since then he and Van Dijk have been key figures in City and Liverpool’s defensive improvements. It is hard to say has been the better of the two, but you won’t find anybody at City willing to swap their Mr Reliable.

Never Say Never

Too many times in the fashion and style world, and on YLF in particular, people say that they will never wear a particular style, trend, colour, or vibe. But often it’s only a question of time before they do, and thoroughly enjoy the item or look. I’m guilty of the same thing, despite my efforts to keep an open mind as a fashion professional. 

Today we’re owning up to these “nevers”. I have many examples, but here are the ones that immediately come to mind. If you’ve been with YLF for a while, you might remember some of them.

Returning to Skinnies

When skinnies came back on to the scene as a fringe trend about fourteen years ago, I was not impressed. I’m an ‘80s gal at heart, but after awfully elegant bootcuts, I thought no way would I go back to tapered skinnies. It took me months to even try them on! When I finally did, I was unsure, but didn’t hate the visual effect. I took the skinnies home and in-house fashion stylist Greg liked them right away. I kept them, and eased myself back into wearing tight tapered pants. It took about a season before I was comfortable with the resurgence of my early ‘80s groove. 

Dropping the Crotch

Eleven years ago, harem pants were quite the fringe trend, and I thought they were awful. I didn’t think the dropped crotch point silhouette looked good on anyone. I headed to Israel later that year, and to my amazement saw loads of locals sporting harem pants with panache. I was wowed, and could not have been more wrong in my initial assessment. I came back to the US, bought a dressy silk pair of harem pants from Ted Baker, and loved them. They’re still going strong today and come out to play every Summer.

Boho Light

I used to say that my style was about as bohemian as Karl Lagerfeld’s look. That is, not bohemian at all. Yet over the years I have been drawn to the soft, flouncy and romantic integrity of boho blouses. I’m totally owning up to wearing a boho-lite look and loving it.

Shorter Lengths

I thought I would never wear full-length flared pants and jeans shorter than at floor-skimming perfect pant lengths. But this year I surprised myself by loving and wearing the new shorter full length with flats and sneakers because it’s a lot more practical for my urban and often wet walking lifestyle. It’s fun to have the trendy bottoms bug, even if it means I have to eat my words.

All the Rest

Although I never said never to small crossbody bags, I said it would be highly unlikely that I would sport them. Same goes for earth tones, chunky soles, Seinfeld sneakers, a monogrammed gold necklace, denim with a polyester content, and a style rich in fashion sneakers. Well, the joke’s on me because I regularly wear these items and adore them.

You can never say never when it comes to fashion and style. Sometimes it takes five minutes for our perceptions to adjust, and sometimes it takes several seasons. Often we are pleasantly surprised by the outcome and what was previous a “never” becomes a wardrobe workhorse. These days when I think “never” about a style, trend, colour, or vibe, I laugh at myself and remind myself to wait and see.

Your turn to fess up. What are you wearing today that you never thought you would?

Click Here: chloe perfume