Trump formally sends Labor secretary nomination to Senate

President TrumpDonald John TrumpOnly Congress can end the China trade war quagmire Trump blasts Bolton: ‘He made some very big mistakes’ Trump seeks ban on flavored e-cigarettes MORE on Wednesday officially sent his pick of Eugene Scalia as Labor secretary to the Senate.

The formal measure moves forward the process for Scalia, a longtime labor attorney and son of the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee will consider Eugene Scalia’s nomination before he moves on to a vote before the full chamber.

Scalia served as the top legal officer at the Department of Labor during the George W. Bush administration and previously was a special assistant to Attorney General William BarrWilliam Pelham BarrWhite House slams judge’s decision to reimpose block on asylum ban Trump awards Medal of Valor, civilian honors to responders in Dayton and El Paso shootings Justice Department considering releasing name in Saudi Arabia 9/11 lawsuit MORE during his first stint as the top law enforcement officer under the George H.W. Bush administration.

He is currently a partner at law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, and he has a career history of representing businesses and fighting to roll back labor regulations. One of his more prominent cases involved representing Walmart as the retail giant fought a Maryland law on employee health care.

Several Democrats are likely to oppose Scalia’s nomination based on his past work for businesses in labor fights, and labor unions have already voiced their concerns about the pick.

Scalia requires a simple majority to get confirmed. With Republicans holding 53 seats in the Senate, he is likely to get the job barring multiple GOP defections.

If confirmed, Scalia will replace Alex AcostaAlex Alexander AcostaTrump officially nominates Eugene Scalia as Labor secretary pick Our farmers need a better labor program Three more Epstein accusers sue estate MORE, who resigned earlier this year amid scrutiny of his handling of a case involving Jeffrey Epstein while he was a U.S. attorney.

Click Here: pinko shop cheap

Senate panel cancels vote on key spending bill amid standoff

The Senate Appropriations Committee on Wednesday canceled votes on two spending bills that had been scheduled for the following day, marking the latest sign of turmoil as lawmakers try to fund the government beyond Sept. 30.

 

The panel had been scheduled to vote Thursday on spending bills covering the departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Labor and Education, as well as the State Department and foreign operations.

 

HHS-Labor-Education, in particular, is viewed as a key priority for Democrats, but had emerged as a headache this week because of fights on controversial issues including abortion and President TrumpDonald John TrumpOnly Congress can end the China trade war quagmire Trump blasts Bolton: ‘He made some very big mistakes’ Trump seeks ban on flavored e-cigarettes MORE‘s border wall.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyManufacturing group leads coalition to urge Congress to reauthorize Ex-Im Bank Senate panel cancels vote on key spending bill amid standoff The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump ousts Bolton; GOP exhales after win in NC MORE (R-Ala.) told a small group of reporters on Tuesday that he was likely to cancel the panel vote on the legislation unless he could work out a deal with Democrats on how to proceed.

 

Click Here: kenzo online españa

“We’re not sure that HHS will be one” that we’ll vote on Thursday, Shelby said. “They might come around on HHS, they might not. We’ll have to see.”

 

The committee is still expected to vote Thursday on a defense spending bill and a spending measure covering energy and water development.

 

Canceling the full committee vote on HHS-Labor-Education comes after a subcommittee vote on the same bill, scheduled for Tuesday, was also canceled.

 

Republicans argued that Democrats were trying to violate the spirit of a two-year budget deal by offering “poison pill” amendments.

 

The backlash from Republicans was sparked by Democratic Sen. Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurraySenate panel cancels vote on key spending bill amid standoff Senate spending talks go off the rails as soon as they begin On The Money: Senate spending talks go off the rails | Trump officials vow to reform Fannie, Freddie if Congress doesn’t act | Majority in poll see recession on the way MORE‘s (Wash.) plan to offer an amendment to HHS-Labor-Education that would block the Trump administration’s Title X rule that prohibits federal funds for health care providers who offer information about abortion.

 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump nears decision on background checks Senate panel cancels vote on key spending bill amid standoff Pelosi: ‘People are dying’ because McConnell won’t bring up gun legislation MORE (R-Ky.) blasted Democrats on the Senate floor on Wednesday, saying there were “some disturbing signals that Democrats may be rethinking that commitment.”

Democrats argue that senators should go on record with their positions on the issue.

“If Senate Republicans are more willing to listen to President Trump than women and patients in their own states, they should own up to it and be willing to let their votes show it,” said Murray, the top Democrat on the Appropriations labor subcommittee.

 

Democrats are also accusing Republicans of shifting $5 billion from the bill to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spending bill as part of funding for the border.

 

“They added $5 billion. They took it out of HHS and put it into DHS,” Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerPelosi: ‘People are dying’ because McConnell won’t bring up gun legislation Draining the swamp starts with fixing the Senate Schumer slams Ross for ‘thuggish behavior’ over reportedly threatening to fire officials MORE (D-N.Y.) told reporters during a weekly press conference. 

 

He added from the Senate floor on Wednesday that McConnell knows “very well this will not fly with Senate Democrats. We’re not going to vote for a budget that is partisan, attempted to be jammed down our throat.”

Facebook's cryptocurrency project to pursue payments license in Switzerland

The group overseeing Facebook’s digital currency project on Wednesday announced it is planning to pursue a payments license in Switzerland.

The Libra Association said it has asked the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) to offer more insight into how the coin – called the “Libra” – will be regulated by the country’s government.

ADVERTISEMENT

The announcement comes as global regulators have ramped up their scrutiny and criticism of Libra, particularly taking issue with Facebook’s decision to position the Libra Association in Switzerland, a country known for its relatively lax financial regulatory environment.

The Libra Association in the statement on Wednesday said Switzerland “offers a pathway for responsible financial services innovation harmonized with global financial norms and strong oversight.”

“Since our vision for the Libra project was announced 3 months ago, we have maintained our commitment that technology-powered financial services innovation and strong regulatory compliance and oversight are not in competition,” Dante Disparte, Libra Association’s head of policy and communications, said in a statement. “We are engaging in constructive dialogue with FINMA and we see a feasible pathway for an open-source blockchain network to become a regulated, low-friction, high-security payment system.”

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have zeroed in on the Swiss nonprofit that will run the Libra coin, ripping the decision as a method to bypass U.S. regulatory scrutiny.

“We cannot allow Facebook to run a risky new cryptocurrency out of a Swiss bank account without oversight,” Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownOn The Money: Senate spending talks go off the rails | Trump officials vow to reform Fannie, Freddie if Congress doesn’t act | Majority in poll see recession on the way Trump officials vow to reform Fannie, Freddie if Congress doesn’t act Hill editor-in-chief: Sanders has to ease fears among seniors on ‘Medicare for All’ MORE (Ohio), the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, said after Libra was announced earlier this year.

The Libra Association and Facebook have insisted they will not launch the Libra coin until they have satisfied global financial regulators.

Facebook earlier this year unveiled its plans to launch Project Libra, a payments system based on a cryptocurrency supported by more than two dozen major corporations, including Uber, Mastercard, Spotify, Vodafone, Coinbase and the nonprofit organization Women’s World Banking.

Facebook said that the cryptocurrency project would be operated by the nonprofit Libra Association and remain separate from the social media platform.

Lawmakers from both parties on Capitol Hill have offered blistering rebukes of Facebook’s plan, saying the new financial system raises concerns over money laundering and even terrorism financing.

While Libra will be controlled by the Swiss nonprofit, the company will operate a virtual wallet called Calibra that is operated by a Facebook subsidiary and will be made available on Facebook’s messaging services WhatsApp and Messenger.

Hillicon Valley: Uber vows to defy California labor bill | Facebook, Google, Twitter to testify on mass shootings | Facebook's Libra to pursue Swiss payments license

Welcome to Hillicon Valley, The Hill’s newsletter detailing all you need to know about the tech and cyber news from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. If you don’t already, be sure to sign up for our newsletter with this LINK.

Welcome! Follow the cyber team, Maggie Miller (@magmill95), and the tech team, Harper Neidig (@hneidig) and Emily Birnbaum (@birnbaum_e).

UBER DEFIES CALIFORNIA BILL: Uber said Wednesday that it doesn’t plan to classify its drivers as employees instead of contractors even as California is moving forward with a bill that would make it harder for the gig economy to withhold employee protections from its workers.

“Because we continue to believe drivers are properly classified as independent, and because we’ll continue to be responsive to what the vast majority of drivers tell us they want most—flexibility—drivers will not be automatically reclassified as employees, even after January of next year,” when the bill would go into effect, said Uber chief legal officer Tony West in a statement.

California’s legislature sent the bill, known as AB 5, to Gov. Gavin NewsomGavin Christopher NewsomCalifornia Senate approves legislation requiring Uber, Lyft to consider drivers as employees Democratic governors call on Trump, McConnell to support gun control measures Overnight Health Care — Presented by PCMA — Number of uninsured jumps for first time since 2009 | Sixth person dies from vaping-related illness | Leaked Pelosi drug pricing plan sets off frenzy MORE’s (D) desk on Wednesday, and he has vowed to sign it. The bill would make it harder for companies like Uber, Lyft and DoorDash to classify their workers as contractors.

But West argued Wednesday that the new law is not impossible for Uber to work around. He also anticipates that the company’s stance will prompt lawsuits from its drivers.

“We expect we will continue to respond to claims of misclassification in arbitration and in court as necessary, just as we do now,” he said. “But we will also continue to advocate for the independence and choice that drivers tell us again and again in surveys, polls, focus groups, and personal conversations that they value most.”

West said that Uber, Lyft and DoorDash would be moving forward with plans to push a state ballot initiative that would ensure that their drivers are “retaining the flexible access to on-demand work they enjoy today.”

Read more here.

 

THIS SHOULD GO SMOOTHLY: Executives from Facebook, Google and Twitter will testify before Congress next week at a hearing about mass violence and extremism.

The Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday announced the witness list for the hearing, titled “Mass Violence, Extremism, and Digital Responsibility.”

“In light of recent incidents of mass violence, this hearing will examine the proliferation of extremism online and explore the effectiveness of industry efforts to remove violent content from online platforms,” the panel said in the announcement. “Witnesses will discuss how technology companies are working with law enforcement when violent or threatening content is identified and the processes for removal of such content.”

The committee will hear from Facebook’s head of global policy, Monika Bickert; Nick Pickles, the public policy director at Twitter; and Google’s global director of information, Derek Slater.

The companies have been under increasing pressure to address extremist content and violent imagery on their platforms amid a recent surge in mass shootings.

Read more here.

 

SWITZERLAND, THE HOME OF NOT-SKETCHY FINANCIAL DEALINGS: The group overseeing Facebook’s digital currency project on Wednesday announced it is planning to pursue a payments license in Switzerland.

The Libra Association said it has asked the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) to offer more insight into how the coin – called the “Libra” – will be regulated by the country’s government.

The announcement comes as global regulators have ramped up their scrutiny and criticism of Libra, particularly taking issue with Facebook’s decision to position the Libra Association in Switzerland, a country known for its relatively lax financial regulatory environment.

The Libra Association in the statement on Wednesday said Switzerland “offers a pathway for responsible financial services innovation harmonized with global financial norms and strong oversight.”

“Since our vision for the Libra project was announced 3 months ago, we have maintained our commitment that technology-powered financial services innovation and strong regulatory compliance and oversight are not in competition,” Dante Disparte, Libra Association’s head of policy and communications, said in a statement. “We are engaging in constructive dialogue with FINMA and we see a feasible pathway for an open-source blockchain network to become a regulated, low-friction, high-security payment system.”

Lawmakers on Capitol Hill have zeroed in on the Swiss nonprofit that will run the Libra coin, ripping the decision as a method to bypass U.S. regulatory scrutiny.

“We cannot allow Facebook to run a risky new cryptocurrency out of a Swiss bank account without oversight,” Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownOn The Money: Senate spending talks go off the rails | Trump officials vow to reform Fannie, Freddie if Congress doesn’t act | Majority in poll see recession on the way Trump officials vow to reform Fannie, Freddie if Congress doesn’t act Hill editor-in-chief: Sanders has to ease fears among seniors on ‘Medicare for All’ MORE (Ohio), the top Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, said after Libra was announced earlier this year.

Read more here.

 

TRUMP KEEPS NATIONAL EMERGENCY DECLARATION ALIVE: President TrumpDonald John TrumpOnly Congress can end the China trade war quagmire Trump blasts Bolton: ‘He made some very big mistakes’ Trump seeks ban on flavored e-cigarettes MORE on Tuesday issued a notice extending a national emergency declaration over foreign interference in U.S. elections.

In a memo to Congress released by the White House, Trump wrote that foreign efforts to interfere with or undermine public confidence in U.S. elections continue “to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

Trump is extending an emergency declaration that he first issued last September. That declaration, issued through an executive order, also called for an executive branch assessment of foreign threats to U.S. elections and imposed sanctions on individuals involved in such efforts.

The message issued to Congress on Tuesday states that there has been “no evidence” of a foreign government changing the outcome of any U.S. elections or vote tabulations but notes that foreign powers “have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system.”

It also states that the proliferation of new technology has increased the threat of foreign interference.

“The ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States,” Trump wrote.

Read more here.

 

KOCH GROUP TARGETS AGS OVER TECH PROBES: Americans for Prosperity, the conservative group backed by the Koch family, announced a new ad campaign defending Google and Facebook from antitrust probes launched by state attorneys general in the past week.

The group on Tuesday urged the state officials to exercise restraint in going after the companies, saying in an announcement that “consumers will be worse off if antitrust laws are used to advance a political agenda by threatening or breaking up successful companies.”

“It’s completely appropriate for state attorneys general to launch this investigation, as long as it isn’t used to create a political spectacle,” Americans for Prosperity’s tech policy analyst, Billy Easley, said in a statement. “There are serious consequences to abusing this kind of enforcement that create troubling ripple effects for American workers and families. The AGs involved should not use this investigation as a means to score political points.”

The ads simply say, “Don’t let government abuse antitrust authority” and direct users to a page that prods them to contact their state attorney general.

Fifty attorneys general announced a major investigation into Google’s market dominance on Monday and a smaller group of nine offices launched a similar investigation into Facebook last week.

The probes are a significant escalation in U.S. regulators’ scrutiny of Silicon Valley giants. The Kochs have been using their influence arms to push back on what they see as an effort to “politicize antitrust laws” to go after the companies.

Read more here.

 

AMAZON GETS MORE SCRUTINY: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reportedly launched an investigation to determine whether Amazon controls an inappropriately large share of the retail market.

Bloomberg News reported Wednesday that at least three merchants that sell products on Amazon’s platform have been contacted by FTC investigators who are reportedly seeking to determine how much of their business relies on Amazon’s services.

Representatives for Amazon and the FTC declined a request for comment from The Hill. The probe follows a similar investigation launched by regulators in the European Union in July.

Members of both parties in Washington have raised alarms about the growing dominance of tech companies in retail and other markets in recent months.

Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinFTC launches Amazon antitrust probe: report The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump ousts Bolton; GOP exhales after win in NC Five takeaways on Trump’s ouster of John Bolton MORE called specifically for an antitrust probe of Amazon and other companies earlier this year.

“If you look at Amazon, although there’s certain benefits to it, they’ve destroyed the retail industry across the United States, so there’s no question they’ve limited competition,” Mnuchin said in July.

“There’s areas where they’ve hurt small businesses, so I don’t think this is a one-size-fits-all and I don’t have an opinion going other than I think it’s absolutely right that the attorney general is looking into these issues,” he added at the time.

Read more here.

 

Lighter click: Don’t try this at home or anywhere else.

An op-ed to chew on: Electric vehicles won’t save us from climate change.

NOTABLE LINKS FROM AROUND THE WEB: 

Uber lays off hundreds more workers as it struggles to make money. (New York Times)

YouTube creators have begun shifting channels after FTC fine leaves futures in jeopardy. (The Verge)

Why WeWork is struggling to sell its story to investors. (Wall Street Journal)

Netanyahu expects US to remain 'very, very tough' on Iran despite Bolton ouster

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin NetanyahuBenjamin (Bibi) NetanyahuMORE said he expects the Trump administration to remain “very, very tough” on Iran after the departure of hawkish former national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonTrump blasts ‘Mr. Tough Guy’ Bolton: ‘He made some very big mistakes’ The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Trump issues Taliban warning at Sept. 11 memorial Andrea Mitchell: Bolton ‘not leaving quietly,’ will return to TV to bash Trump MORE.

Netanyahu cited recent sanctions against Iran’s Revolutionary Guard that were declared shortly after the firing was first announced as evidence that the White House will continue its “maximum pressure” campaign on Tehran despite Bolton’s departure.

ADVERTISEMENT

“So I am convinced, I have no doubts at all, that in any situation — with talks, without talks — President TrumpDonald John TrumpOnly Congress can end the China trade war quagmire Trump blasts Bolton: ‘He made some very big mistakes’ Trump seeks ban on flavored e-cigarettes MORE and his administration will be very, very tough with Iran,” Netanyahu told Israeli media outlet Channel 20, according to Reuters.

Bolton was among Washington’s most prominent hawks on Iran, advocating at one point for regime change in Tehran. The Iranian government lauded his departure, urging Washington to shun “warmongers.”

Trump announced Bolton’s firing Tuesday, saying that “his services are no longer needed at the White House” and that “I disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions, as did others in the Administration.” 

Iran was among the topics on which Trump and Bolton are believed to have disagreed. Secretary of State Mike PompeoMichael (Mike) Richard PompeoThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Trump issues Taliban warning at Sept. 11 memorial US commemorates 18th anniversary of 9/11 Rocket explodes at US Embassy in Afghanistan on anniversary of 9/11 attacks MORE said shortly after Bolton’s firing that Trump might meet Iranian President Hassan Rouhani at the United Nations General Assembly this month.

Netanyahu expressed faith in Pompeo and Trump, saying they are the true decisionmakers on foreign policy.

“Look, the one who formally crafted the American policy was Pompeo … and President Trump of course. But I’m not getting into the personality changes in this administration,” he told Channel 20. 

The Trump administration has taken a hard-line stance on Iran since 2017, withdrawing the U.S. from the Obama-era nuclear deal and slapping a bevy of sanctions on Tehran in an effort to pressure it to negotiate a new deal that expands beyond its nuclear program.

Netanyahu, who is neck-and-neck with two centrist rivals ahead of a national election next week, has campaigned heavily on national security in the final days of the race, promoting ideas such as annexing parts of the West Bank as he seeks to shore up his conservative bona fides and suggest candidates to his left would leave Israel at risk.

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

Lawmakers grill manufacturers over 'forever chemicals' contamination

Lawmakers on Tuesday expressed frustration with major manufacturers behind chemicals that have contaminated drinking water across the country, demanding answers on how they plan to deal with toxic “forever chemicals.”

Members of the House Oversight and Reform Committee grilled company representatives over what they say was decades of awareness of the dangers of their products and their role helping spread fluorochemicals known as PFAS.

“You have played a part in this national emergency. You have sickened our first responders and members of the military, and I don’t know how you sleep at night,” Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.) told representatives for 3M, Dupont and Chemours.

The company representatives testified Tuesday as Congress weighs how to address the spread of PFAS, which have earned the nickname “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment and in human bodies.

ADVERTISEMENT

The chemical’s variants are used in products such as nonstick pans, rain coats and firefighting foam. The chemicals are also linked with cancer and numerous other health problems.

Lawmakers have been working on a package of bills to address the substance, which has spread into water in at least 49 states, but there has been hesitance on both sides of the aisle about how broadly to regulate the substance.

Denise Rutherford, senior vice president of corporate affairs for 3M, stressed Tuesday that the company had taken voluntary measures to phase out of some forms of PFAS during the Clinton administration, even though “there is still no cause and effect relationship for any adverse human affect” of PFAS.

“This is ridiculous. We have a huge problem in this country,” said Rep. Dan KildeeDaniel (Dan) Timothy KildeeHouse Democrat presses Pompeo over price of Trump’s scrapped Denmark trip The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump’s new target: Elijah Cummings Pelosi backers feel vindicated after tumultuous stretch MORE (D-Mich.). “There’s plenty of science out there that demonstrates these are harmful chemicals and dangerous to human consumption or you wouldn’t have taken them off the market in the first place.”

The hearing further exposed the rift between Dupont and Chemours – the latter a spinoff of DuPont – over who should be financially liable for contamination.

Daryl Roberts, chief operations and engineering officer for DuPont, said the company would clean up its current sites, but argued the company should not be held responsible for contamination caused by entities under Chemours.

“They’re in a great financial position. There’s no reason they would need our help to clean up their sites,” Roberts said.

Chemours, which spun off from DuPont in 2015, has argued that its financial liabilities are much greater than what DuPont first predicted.

“The cleanup has to happen. This to me is a non-option. The question is who’s paying for it?” asked Rep. Katie HillKatherine (Katie) Lauren HillAnti-Trump vets join Steyer group in pressing Democrats to impeach Trump House Dems, Senate GOP build money edge to protect majorities Live coverage: House Oversight examines Trump family separation policy MORE (D-Calif.). “If that company doesn’t exist through corporate gymnastics who does pay that bill?”

The companies did, however, show support for two proposals current being debated in Congress, including regulating two of the more than 5,000 types of PFAS and updating the Superfund law to allow federal funds to help clean up sites contaminated by PFAS.

“It should send a clear message to the president and any member of Congress who might still have some misplaced concerns about potential regulatory burdens associated with PFAS solutions, including declaring some PFAS chemicals as hazardous substances under the Superfund law,” said Sen. Tom CarperThomas (Tom) Richard CarperEPA ordered to set stronger smog standards America is in desperate need of infrastructure investment: Senate highway bill a step in the right direction FARA should apply to Confucius Institutes MORE (D-Del.), who has pushed to allow Superfund money to be used for PFAS cleanups. “Some of the companies that would be regulated under these policies have now publicly declared their support for them – that’s consequential.”

Trump extends national emergency on foreign election interference

President TrumpDonald John Trump5 things to watch in critical NC race Remembering 9/11: How the suicide attacks led to two vastly different wars Conservative strategist calls Steyer’s 2020 bid a ‘vanity run’ MORE on Tuesday issued a notice extending a national emergency declaration over foreign interference in U.S. elections.

In a memo to Congress released by the White House, Trump wrote that foreign efforts to interfere with or undermine public confidence in U.S. elections continue “to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.”

Trump is extending an emergency declaration that he first issued last September. That declaration, issued through an executive order, also called for an executive branch assessment of foreign threats to U.S. elections and imposed sanctions on individuals involved in such efforts.

ADVERTISEMENT

The message issued to Congress on Tuesday states that there has been “no evidence” of a foreign government changing the outcome of any U.S. elections or vote tabulations but notes that foreign powers “have historically sought to exploit America’s free and open political system.”

It also states that the proliferation of new technology has increased the threat of foreign interference.

“The ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation, continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States,” Trump wrote.

He said he would thus extend the national emergency, which was due to expire in the coming days without action.

Trump’s letter does not make mention of specific foreign threats but follows Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, which former special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerFox’s Cavuto roasts Trump over criticism of network Mueller report fades from political conversation Trump calls for probe of Obama book deal MORE described as “sweeping and systematic” in his lengthy report released in April.

The president has faced criticism over his response to Russian interference, particularly at times when he has cast doubt on the U.S. intelligence community’s finding that Moscow interfered with the intention of helping him defeat Democrat Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonCBS News producer to become NBC News deputy Washington bureau chief 5 things to watch in critical NC race Ginsburg calls proposal to eliminate Electoral College ‘more theoretical than real’ MORE.

Despite the Russian efforts, neither Mueller nor U.S. officials have said that Russia’s interference had a material impact on the 2016 vote.

The Trump administration has imposed sanctions and taken other steps to assess and prevent foreign influence operations. Still, top intelligence officials have warned of continued efforts by Russia to meddle in U.S. political affairs.

“The Russians are absolutely intent on trying to interfere with our elections,” FBI Director Christopher Wray told a Senate panel in July, adding that Moscow hasn’t been sufficiently deterred by sanctions imposed by the U.S. government.

Trump and his Republican allies have faced pressure from Democrats, who argue they’re not doing enough to guard future U.S. elections.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Bolton out as national security adviser Suburban anxiety drives GOP on guns Democrats play to Trump’s ego on guns MORE (R-Ky.) has blocked election security bills from reaching the Senate floor for a vote, accusing Democrats of attempting to pass “partisan legislation.”

Click Here: gold coast suns 2019 guernsey

Kremlin: Reported US spy worked in Putin's office

The Kremlin confirmed Tuesday that a man who Russian media suggested was a U.S. spy extracted in 2017 had worked in President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinKremlin: Reported US spy worked in Putin’s office CIA source pulled from Russia had confirmed Putin ordered 2016 meddling: NY Times CNN reports US pulled spy from Russia amid concerns about Trump’s handling of intel MORE‘s office before he was fired, Reuters reports. 

CNN reported on Monday that the U.S. removed a spy from Russia in 2017 over concerns that President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump endorses Missouri GOP governor for 2020 election Republican Greg Murphy wins special election in NC’s 3rd District Dem senator calls for Pentagon watchdog to probe Air Force’s Trump resort stay MORE mishandled intelligence. The New York Times later reported that the spy played a major role in the CIA’s determination that Putin personally directed Russia’s interference operation in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. 

The White House, however, disputed the reports. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday that the man worked in the presidential administration, but was fired several years ago, according to Reuters. 

“His job was not at a senior official level,” Peskov said, adding that he could not confirm if the man was a spy. 

“I don’t know whether he was an agent. I can only confirm that there was such a person in the presidential administration, who was later sacked,” Peskov said. 

“All this U.S. media speculation about who urgently extracted who and saved who from who and so on — this is more the genre of pulp fiction, crime reading, so let’s leave it up to them,” Peskov added. 

Reuters, citing the Russian newspaper Kommersant, reports that the man disappeared with his wife and children on vacation in Montenegro in 2017 and is now reported to be living in the U.S. 

Click Here: gold coast suns 2019 guernsey

On The Money: Senate spending talks go off the rails | Trump officials vow to reform Fannie, Freddie if Congress doesn't act | Majority in poll see recession on the way

Happy Tuesday and welcome back to On The Money. I’m Sylvan Lane, and here’s your nightly guide to everything affecting your bills, bank account and bottom line.

See something I missed? Let me know at slane@thehill.com or tweet me @SylvanLane. And if you like your newsletter, you can subscribe to it here: http://bit.ly/1NxxW2N.

Write us with tips, suggestions and news: slane@thehill.com, njagoda@thehill.com and nelis@thehill.com. Follow us on Twitter: @SylvanLane, @NJagoda and @NivElis.

 

THE BIG DEAL– Senate spending talks go off the rails: Senate negotiations to fund the government descended into chaos on Tuesday, underscoring the fight awaiting lawmakers as they try to prevent a shutdown.

The talks snagged almost immediately after they started amid deep disagreements over abortion and funding for the U.S.-Mexico border wall, among other issues.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both sides are swapping accusations, with Republicans saying Democrats are violating the spirit of the two-year budget deal and Trump effectively throwing a grenade into the talks with his plan to raid military construction funds to build the wall.

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbySenate spending talks go off the rails Senate panel advances 5B defense spending bill This week: Congress returns for first time since mass shootings MORE (R-Ala.) warned that they’ll need to resolve the partisan fighting in order to move funding bills “if we’re going to move them very far.”

“If we’re going to have problems and disagreements, if we can have them early and resolve them, that’s good. If you have them early and they continue and persist and never go away, that’s not a good sign,” he added.

Congress has less than 11 working days before the deadline to either pass the fiscal 2020 bills or a short-term continuing resolution (CR).

The Hill’s Niv Elis and Jordain Carney with more on a chaotic day at the Capitol.

 

The problem: 

  • The trouble was immediately apparent on Tuesday as the Senate Appropriations Committee started work on its first bill.
  • With just 20 days until the new fiscal year begins, the panel was meant to begin a belated markup process with the two largest spending bills covering the Pentagon, and the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education (Labor-H).
  • But the Labor-H markup was abruptly canceled, as lawmakers clashed over a proposed amendment from Sen. Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurrayPush on ‘surprise’ medical bills hits new roadblocks Teachers union calls on Congress to pass gun legislation Overnight Health Care: Planned Parenthood to leave federal family planning program absent court action | Democrats demand Trump withdraw rule on transgender health | Cummings, Sanders investigate three drug companies for ‘obstructing’ probe MORE (D-Wash.) to block the Trump administration’s Title X rule, which would prohibit funds going to providers that offer information about abortion.
  • Republicans argue the amendment would be a “poison pill” under a handshake deal struck by leadership and the White House this year. Democrats say senators should be on the record with their positions on the issue.
  • There were also disagreements on funding levels linked to the wall, as Democrats argued that funding for the Labor-H bill could end up financing the border wall in some capacity.

 

Read more: Senate Democrats are planning to force a vote to try to nix President TrumpDonald John Trump5 things to watch in critical NC race Remembering 9/11: How the suicide attacks led to two vastly different wars Conservative strategist calls Steyer’s 2020 bid a ‘vanity run’ MORE‘s emergency declaration transferring military construction money to fund the U.S.-Mexico border wall. 

 

ON TAP TOMORROW

  • A House Financial Services subcommittee holds a hearing on private market exemptions and initial public offerings, 10 a.m.
  • A House Financial Services subcommittee holds a hearing on the macroeconomic impacts of climate change, 2 p.m.

 

LEADING THE DAY

Trump officials vow to reform Fannie, Freddie if Congress doesn’t act: Top Trump administration officials warned senators Tuesday that they plan to begin moving forward with a sweeping plan to overhaul the federal housing finance system with or without support from Congress.

Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Bolton out as national security adviser Trump fires national security adviser Bolton Trump faces tough path to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac overhaul MORE, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben CarsonBenjamin (Ben) Solomon CarsonTrump faces tough path to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac overhaul On The Money: Congress faces sprint to avoid shutdown | McConnell sees need for short-term funding | Trump vows to release report on finances before election | White House to consider tax-cut package next year | CBO says deficit surpassed T Watchdog faults EPA response to lead paint hazards MORE and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Mark Calabria urged the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee to help unwind the post-crisis regulatory system that lawmakers have struggled to reform for more than a decade.

Even so, Mnuchin, Carson and Calabria pledged to flex their executive authority to free the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, better known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, from Washington’s control.

“The Administration’s preference is to work with Congress to enact comprehensive housing finance reform legislation,” Mnuchin said. “At the same time, we believe that reform can and should proceed administratively,” he added. I explain what that means here.

 

The dynamic: 

  • There are steps the Trump administration can take on its own, including forcing Fannie and Freddie to boost capital reserves before releasing them to the private sector.
  • But much of the plan released by Treasury last week cannot be enacted without legislation.

 

The hurdles ahead:

A major legislative push just 14 months before the 2020 elections would depend on ample bipartisan agreement and good will. While senators were unified by concern with rising housing prices nationwide, Senate Democrats made it clear that there was no appetite for the administration’s proposal.

  • Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownHill editor-in-chief: Sanders has to ease fears among seniors on ‘Medicare for All’ Bank watchdogs approve rule to loosen ban on risky Wall Street trades Dayton mayor assigned extra security following verbal spat with Trump MORE (Ohio), the banking panel’s ranking Democrat, condemned the Trump plan as a “cream-skimming privatization scheme.” 
  • Sen. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerGOP senators object to White House delaying home-state projects for border wall Report highlights Instagram, deepfake videos as key disinformation threats in 2020 elections GOP Sen. Johnny Isakson to resign at end of year MORE (D-Va.), a moderate who has played a leading role in previous housing finance negotiations, also doubted the administration’s ability to support lending to troubled consumers if their plan to downsize Fannie and Freddie succeeded.

 

GOOD TO KNOW

  • A majority of respondents said in a new poll that a recession is likely within the next year amid the escalating trade war between the U.S. and China.
  • President Trump argued in a court document filed late Monday that a federal judge should deny a motion to dismiss his lawsuit challenging New York’s law that allows Congress to request his tax returns.
  • Fifty-one chief executives at major U.S. corporations, including Amazon, AT&T and IBM, are urging Congress to pass federal consumer privacy legislation that would block states from implementing their own regulations on data privacy.

 

ODDS AND ENDS

  • Comedian Hasan Minhaj testified before a congressional committee Tuesday about student loans, telling lawmakers that crushing debt is “sidelining millions of Americans.”

Senate spending talks go off the rails as soon as they begin

Senate negotiations to fund the government descended into chaos on Tuesday, underscoring the fight awaiting lawmakers as they try to prevent a shutdown.

The talks snagged almost immediately after they started amid deep disagreements over abortion and funding for the U.S.-Mexico border wall, among other issues.

Both sides are swapping accusations, with Republicans saying Democrats are violating the spirit of the two-year budget deal and Trump effectively throwing a grenade into the talks with his plan to raid military construction funds to build the wall.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbySenate spending talks go off the rails Senate panel advances 5B defense spending bill This week: Congress returns for first time since mass shootings MORE (R-Ala.) warned that they’ll need to resolve the partisan fighting in order to move funding bills “if we’re going to move them very far.”

“If we’re going to have problems and disagreements, if we can have them early and resolve them, that’s good. If you have them early and they continue and persist and never go away, that’s not a good sign,” he added.

Congress has less than 11 working days before the deadline to either pass the fiscal 2020 bills or a short-term continuing resolution (CR).

The trouble was immediately apparent on Tuesday as the Senate Appropriations Committee started work on its first bill, covering the Pentagon.

Democrats fumed over Trump’s decision to move $3.6 billion from military construction to build the wall, following a previous move to reprogram $2.5 billion in the Pentagon’s anti-drug trafficking money.

“Congress cannot and should not be silent when the power of the purse is undermined in this way,” said Sen. Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinSenate spending talks go off the rails Senate panel advances 5B defense spending bill Suburban anxiety drives GOP on guns MORE (Ill.), the top Democrat on the Appropriations defense subcommittee.

“Why are we here? Why do we have an Appropriations Committee if this president can ask for money for certain purposes, we appropriate it, and then he ignores us and takes the money for his own political agenda?” he added.

Click Here: essendon bombers guernsey 2019

Democrats are expected to force a vote on the Senate floor this month to nix the emergency declaration. They’re also planning to offer an amendment during Thursday’s full committee vote to include language in the defense bill that would prevent the administration from redirecting Pentagon money to the wall without congressional approval.

“The problem that we have now is trying to write things that are so clear that the White House can’t just ignore the Constitution,” said Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahyOvernight Defense: Trump says Taliban talks ‘dead’ after canceled Camp David meeting | North Korea offers to restart nuke talks this month | Trump denies role in Air Force crew staying at his resort McConnell: Short-term spending bill needed to avoid shutdown Collins: Senate should vote on gun reform package this month MORE (D-Vt.), arguing that Trump’s emergency declaration had created a “lack of trust” on Capitol Hill.

It’s an unusually rocky start for a Senate committee that prides itself on being bipartisan.

Durbin was caught on a hot mic after the committee meeting appearing to tell Shelby that he might not be able to back the measure at the full committee level. It’s customary for the defense bill to clear the committee with bipartisan support.

“I don’t want to be in a spot on Thursday where I’m doing something that breaks my heart,” Durbin could be heard telling Shelby.

“If there’s a way you and I can do something on this, let me know, buddy,” he added.

Shelby responded that he would take the issue to leadership.

“You know it ain’t me,” he told Durbin.

Democrats accuse Republicans of putting $12 billion in border funding in the Senate spending bills. This consists of $8.6 billion in new funding and an additional $3.6 billion to offset funds redirected from military construction projects.

“They know darn well that a $12 billion additional monies for wall is not going to fly with Senate Democrats or the House, so they ought to get to serious negotiating now that they’ve shown the president they’re paying a little more fealty to him,” Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerSchumer slams Ross for ‘thuggish behavior’ over reportedly threatening to fire officials Top Democrats press Trump on background checks legislation GOP senator on gun reform: Trump needs to ‘set some guidelines’ on what he’ll sign MORE (D-N.Y.) told reporters.

The wall is just one of the fights threatening a deal.

Democrats are planning to offer their own top-line spending numbers, known as 302(b)s, for the subcommittees during a vote scheduled for Thursday. Republicans also abruptly canceled a subcommittee vote on a funding bill covering the departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Education.

Republicans are accusing Democrats of trying to violate the spirit of the two-year budget deal by offering an amendment to block the Trump administration’s Title X rule, which would block funds from health care providers that offer information about abortion.

Republicans argue the amendment, from Sen. Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurrayPush on ‘surprise’ medical bills hits new roadblocks Teachers union calls on Congress to pass gun legislation Overnight Health Care: Planned Parenthood to leave federal family planning program absent court action | Democrats demand Trump withdraw rule on transgender health | Cummings, Sanders investigate three drug companies for ‘obstructing’ probe MORE (D-Wash.), would be a “poison pill” under a handshake deal struck by leadership and the White House this year. They say Democrats want the vote because they think they could flip one or two GOP senators.

Democrats argue that senators should go on record with their positions on the issue.

“If Senate Republicans are more willing to listen to President TrumpDonald John Trump5 things to watch in critical NC race Remembering 9/11: How the suicide attacks led to two vastly different wars Conservative strategist calls Steyer’s 2020 bid a ‘vanity run’ MORE than women and patients in their own states, they should own up to it and be willing to let their votes show it,” said Murray, the top Democrat on the Appropriations labor subcommittee.

Shelby indicated that without a deal, Thursday’s full committee vote on the bill would likely be canceled. Votes are still expected for defense, as well as bills for energy and water and for state and foreign operations.

The tumultuous beginning to the Senate appropriations process, which Democrats note has begun later than at any point in the last 30 years, raises questions about when and how the spending bills will get done.

The Democratic-controlled House wants to pass a stopgap measure to extend the spending deadline into late November, though the most contentious issues could need even more time. Last year, the wall issue derailed a late-December deal and led to a 35-day partial government shutdown, the longest in the nation’s history.

“It’s just too bad this process didn’t start earlier in the summer,” said Rep. Tom ColeThomas (Tom) Jeffrey ColeSocial determinants of health — health care isn’t just bugs and bacteria Republicans suffer whiplash from Trump’s erratic week To fix retirement, we need to understand it MORE (R-Okla.), the ranking member on the House Appropriations labor subcommittee.

Cole added that despite the setbacks he remains optimistic that the work can get done by year’s end.

“I’m determined to be optimistic,” he said.

Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyThe Hill’s Morning Report – Can Trump save GOP in North Carolina special election? Democrats play to Trump’s ego on guns Senators expect White House staff to brief Trump on potential gun control plan MORE (D-Conn.), a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, called for his colleagues to be “grown-ups” and work out issues in the homeland security bill, which covers immigration and any potential border barriers, now.

“I don’t want to pretend that this dispute over border funding doesn’t exist like we did last cycle,” he warned. “That will get us into another multimonth shutdown.”